Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 23-August-2007, 09:42 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,117
Default Huge Hole Found in the Universe

Huge Hole Found in the Universe

Quote:
The universe has a huge hole in it that dwarfs anything else of its kind. The discovery caught astronomers by surprise.

The hole is nearly a billion light-years across. It is not a black hole, which is a small sphere of densely packed matter. Rather, this one is mostly devoid of stars, gas and other normal matter, and it's also strangely empty of the mysterious "dark matter" that permeates the cosmos. Other space voids have been found before, but nothing on this scale.

Astronomers don't know why the hole is there.

"Not only has no one ever found a void this big, but we never even expected to find one this size," said researcher Lawrence Rudnick of the University of Minnesota.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 23-August-2007, 10:28 PM
Cougar's Avatar
Cougar Cougar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 3,870
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToSeek View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Author Robert Roy Britt
...the slightly colder temperature of the CMB in this region appears to be caused by a huge hole devoid of nearly all matter roughly 6 to 10 billion light-years from Earth," Rudnick said..... Photons of the CMB gain a small amount of energy when they pass through normal regions of space with matter, the researchers explained. But when the CMB passes through a void, the photons lose energy, making the CMB from that part of the sky appear cooler.
Huh? I thought the "hot and cold" variations in the CMB were due to the density fluctuations on the surface of last scattering, NOT due to the existence or lack of matter BETWEEN that surface and our vantage point on Earth!
__________________
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 23-August-2007, 11:43 PM
Mayonaze Mayonaze is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 14
Default Hole in the Universe

I suppose this is where all my odd socks have been going ...
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 23-August-2007, 11:54 PM
bmpbmp bmpbmp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 537
Default

so basically this thing is sucking up galaxys and growing, this aint good...

There is a "remarkable drop in the number of galaxies" in a region of sky in the constellation Eridanus, Rudnick said.
__________________
Don't Hate Me Cause I Am Dum
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 24-August-2007, 12:19 AM
antoniseb's Avatar
antoniseb antoniseb is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 14,695
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bmpbmp View Post
so basically this thing is sucking up galaxys and growing, this aint good...
For all we know, it is at least as likely that either:
1. It has excess dark energy and is pushing galaxies away, or
2. It has always been a hole.
__________________
Forming opinions as we speak
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 24-August-2007, 12:20 AM
bmpbmp bmpbmp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 537
Default

huh

but if it is sucking up galaxys arent we gonna be part of that

I mean if it is devouoring things we can be gone before we even know it know.

6 to 10 billions light years how far is that in laymen terms to us, how long would it take to reach our galaxy
__________________
Don't Hate Me Cause I Am Dum

Last edited by bmpbmp : 24-August-2007 at 12:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 24-August-2007, 01:17 AM
Nowhere Man's Avatar
Nowhere Man Nowhere Man is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southfield MI
Posts: 1,683
Default

It's the distance light travels in 6 to 10 billion years, at about 6 trillion miles per year.

Stop worrying about it. The sun will be long dead before it gets to "us," if it is moving toward us at all.

Fred
__________________
"For shame, gentlemen, pack your evidence a little better against another time."
-- John Dryden, "The Vindication of The Duke of Guise" 1684
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 24-August-2007, 01:23 AM
bmpbmp bmpbmp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 537
Default

I dont understand that nowhereman, can you please explain how to calculate that
__________________
Don't Hate Me Cause I Am Dum
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 24-August-2007, 01:25 AM
matt.o matt.o is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 137
Default

We know from large spectroscopic and photometric surveys that the large scale structure of the universe is filamentry and spiderweb - like. In between the filaments, clusters, suoerclusters etc there are voids, which are generally ~<50Mpc in size. This seems to be anomalous because it is on the scale of Gpc, rather than tens of Mpc. How did it get this big?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 24-August-2007, 01:30 AM
Fortunate Fortunate is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Miami
Posts: 601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cougar View Post
Huh? I thought the "hot and cold" variations in the CMB were due to the density fluctuations on the surface of last scattering, NOT due to the existence or lack of matter BETWEEN that surface and our vantage point on Earth!
Here is a proposed explanation of how the large void could cause a cool spot.
http://www.physorg.com/news107109720.html
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 24-August-2007, 01:36 AM
Ronald Brak Ronald Brak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,214
Default

About that hole in the universe - I didn't do it, nobody saw me and you can't prove anything.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 24-August-2007, 02:00 AM
Fortunate Fortunate is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Miami
Posts: 601
Default

If the result stands up, and the explanation in the physorg.com article also seems to stand up, maybe this could provide a quantitative test of the putative dark energy.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 24-August-2007, 02:29 AM
bmpbmp bmpbmp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 537
Default

Can someone explain how this It's the distance light travels in 6 to 10 billion years, at about 6 trillion miles per year.
means longer than when the sun dies out. Isnt trillion more than billion
__________________
Don't Hate Me Cause I Am Dum
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 24-August-2007, 02:30 AM
William William is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 505
Cool CMB Cold Spot

Fortunate, I am not sure why this observation could be used to infer dark energy is real. But I suppose dark energy is the popular theory of the day.

See below for a description of the CMB anomaly. There are other explanations as to what could cause such a large anomaly besides dark energy. I thought explaining large structures was one of the unexplained cosmological mysteries.

Attached is a link to the preprint of the paper which I believed the physics org article refers to and a couple of excerpts.

“Extragalactic Radio Sources and the WMAP Cold spot” by Lawrence Rudnick, Shea Brown, Liliya Williams

http://arxiv.org/pdf/0704.0908.pdf

Quote:
Foreground Corrections

Several studies have claimed that the properties of the cold spot are most likely an effect of incorrect foreground subtraction (Chiang & Naselsky 2004; Coles 2005; Liu & Zhang 2005; Tojeiro et al. 2006). This possibility has been investigated in detail for both the first year (Vielva et al. 2004; Cruz et al. 2005, 2006) and third (Cruz et al. 2007) year WMAP data. The arguments against foreground subtraction errors can be summarized in three main points – 1) The region of the spot shows no spectral dependence in the WMAP data. This is consistent with the CMB and inconsistent with the known spectral behavior of galactic emission (as well as the SZ effect). The flat (CMB-like) spectrum is found both in temperature and kurtosis, as well as in real and wavelet space. 2) Foreground emission is found to be low in the region of the spot, making it unlikely that an over-subtraction could produce an apparent non-Gaussianity.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sachs-Wolfe_effect

Quote:
Discussion
The WMAP cold spot could have three origins: a) at the last scattering surface (z approx. 1000), b) cosmologically local (z < 1), or c) galactic. Because the spot corresponds to a significant deficit of flux (and source number counts) in the NVSS, we have argued here that the spot is cosmologically local and hence, a localized manifestation of the late ISW effect.
Quote:
Concluding remarks:

“We have detected a significant dip in the average surface brightness and number counts of radio sources from the NVSS survey at 1.4 GHz in the direction of the WMAP cold spot. The deficit of extragalactic sources is also seen in a single dish image at 408 MHz. Together with previous work, we rule out instrumental artifacts in WMAP due to foreground subtraction. A fuller examination of the statistical uncertainties associated with our combination of the McEwen et al. (2007) wavelet results and our own a posteriori analysis should be performed.

With this caveat, we conclude that the cold spot arises from effects along the line of sight, and not at the last scattering surface itself. Any non-gaussianity of the WMAP cold spot therefore would then have a local origin. A 140 Mpc radius, completely empty void at z approx. 1 is sufficient to create the magnitude and angular size of the cold spot through the late integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect. Voids this large currently seem improbable in the concordance cosmology, adding to the anomalies associated with the CMB.

We suggest that a closer investigation of all mass tracers would be useful to search for significant contributions from isolated regions. Also, if our interpretation of the cold spot is correct, it might be possible to detect it indirectly using Planck, through the lack of lensing-induced polarization B modes (Zaldarriaga & Seljak 1997).”
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 24-August-2007, 02:55 AM
trinitree88 trinitree88 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,265
Question sees it's shadow..6 more weeks of winter

Now, if the galaxy-hog comes out of the hole-in-the-universe on February second, and sees its' shadow, ther'll be six more weeks of winter.
On the other hand if it's cloudy, and the shadow is faint, spring will be early.

......who needs Punxatawny Phil?

If the CMB is smooth to~ one part in ten million, indicating an isotropic and homogeneous fireball, how does a void ~ 1/15 of the universe form?
__________________
A third rate theory forbids
A second rate theory explains after the fact
A first rate theory predicts...A. Lomonosov
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 24-August-2007, 06:09 AM
Jens's Avatar
Jens Jens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,825
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bmpbmp View Post
so basically this thing is sucking up galaxys and growing, this aint good...

There is a "remarkable drop in the number of galaxies" in a region of sky in the constellation Eridanus, Rudnick said.
I think you watch too much science fiction movies. The person doesn't mean that the number of galaxies is "dropping", but rather that the number falls when you get there, compared to other places. It doesn't mean that there were more last year, and that they've disappeared. We're not talking about the Bermuda triangle.

In any case, if galaxies were being "sucked into it" then there would be more galaxies there, not less.

So take a deep breath and relax.

And I can't help you with the calculations, but I can say, it's a looooong ways away.
__________________
As above, so below
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 24-August-2007, 06:11 AM
Jens's Avatar
Jens Jens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,825
Default

The interesting question for me about this is whether this has any bearing on the debate about the fractality of the universe. It is always assumed that the universe must be isotropic at large scales.
__________________
As above, so below
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 24-August-2007, 06:29 AM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,292
Default

I've got a feeling that the whole Universe is so large that somewhere it contains voids bigger than our visible universe.

Must be rough on the beings living next door to a super-void, thinking how odd their position, to be on the edge of the matter. That way, stuff. The other way, nothing.
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0....
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 24-August-2007, 06:44 AM
Jens's Avatar
Jens Jens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,825
Default

Well, we ourselves are not quite on the very edge of anything, but in many ways we have a similar thing.

We live on the edge of the solid earth. On one side of us is solid earth, and on the other side the heavens above.

In the solar system, we are in a sense on an edge. On one side there is the bright sun, and on the other side darkness.

And in the Milky Way, we are kind of on the edge, so in some directions we see lots of stars but in others relatively few stars.

So I doubt that being on the edge of a super-void would make all that much of a difference. They would just notice that the night sky was a lot brighter on one side than the other.
__________________
As above, so below
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 24-August-2007, 09:38 AM
Drbuzz0's Avatar
Drbuzz0 Drbuzz0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 246
Send a message via ICQ to Drbuzz0 Send a message via AIM to Drbuzz0 Send a message via MSN to Drbuzz0 Send a message via Yahoo to Drbuzz0 Send a message via Skype™ to Drbuzz0
Default

Aw man. I saw that news story and I came here thinking that I would be the first to post in BAUT... oh well.

But yeah, this is something weird. Obviously just based on random scattering of matter there will be some spaces which have less then others, but this is many orders of magnitude larger than would be predicted.

Perhaps one of the galaxies in the area is telling really bad jokes? Or is just really smelly?

Okay... there's that poor attempt at humor.

But this "hole" is so large that it will obviously take a lot of time for the light to travel from one side to the other. Is it somehow possible that there is not one single large hole? But rather.. that by the time the light from the far side travels to the near side that part is no longer empty...

Okay... I don't know how to explain what my under-rested 4:00 am brain is trying to say. I'll try later. (maybe somebody got it. I'm getting at the whole "time is a factor" thing and "there is no universal now")
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 24-August-2007, 11:45 AM
GregA GregA is offline