Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 20-September-2007, 06:27 PM
Launch window's Avatar
Launch window Launch window is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,976
Default

It's been covered on the spoof

Peru Attacked by Pluto

Putin said he had an alibi.

Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 20-September-2007, 06:48 PM
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,492
Default

I had thought the bugs did it actually.

We need Zim to go capture that brain bug.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 20-September-2007, 06:56 PM
danscope's Avatar
danscope danscope is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: R.I.
Posts: 2,073
Default

Sgt. Zim will do the job!!! Nw, there's a good man.

Robert Heinlein ..'Starship Troopers' . A pity more people haven't read the book. A great insight into what it means to be a Veteran, and a Citizen and the value of the Soverign franchise.
Best regards, Dan
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 20-September-2007, 08:18 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 15,058
Default

From the article.
Quote:
"We are not completely certain that there was no contamination," Mechare said.
I hope that sounded better in Spanish.

Quote:
But a team of doctors sent to the isolated site, 3˝ hours travel from the state capital of Puno, said they found no evidence the meteorite had sickened people, the Lima newspaper El Comercio reported Wednesday. See where the meteorite landed »

Modesto Montoya, a member of the team, was quoted as saying doctors also had found no sign of radioactive contamination among families living nearby, but had taken blood samples from 19 people to be sure.

He said fear may have provoked psychosomatic ailments.
As Fazor also said, I suspect psychosomatic or some sort of mass hysteria.
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 20-September-2007, 08:35 PM
Jerry's Avatar
Jerry Jerry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,985
Default

Mass hysteria is very appropriate when a chunk of space THAT big splats in your neighborhood, raining dirt clouds and dingleberries. It might even drag a few Hail Mary's outta me.
__________________
jwj

It's a big universe out there...is it really unwinding, really burning out?
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 20-September-2007, 08:39 PM
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,492
Default

Is an impact scary?

http://www.killsometime.com/Video/video.asp?ID=322
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 21-September-2007, 05:19 AM
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Posts: 4,659
Send a message via MSN to Sticks
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post

That was an advert for a truck

I think it has been already discussed here. Any hue, according to Phill, it may have been a scud missile
__________________
Moderations in purple

Fame, glory, adventure, a cyber warrior craves not these things.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 21-September-2007, 07:45 AM
Jens's Avatar
Jens Jens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 2,508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by danscope View Post
Sgt. Zim will do the job!!! Nw, there's a good man.
This is completely off topic, but I was thinking about Starship Troopers yesterday. I remember seeing a poster or something for the movie that showed a helmet pierced by a bug's (or whatever you call them) leg (or whatever you call it!) Does anybody else remember that? Maybe it was from the trailer or something.
__________________
As above, so below
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 21-September-2007, 12:00 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 9,131
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks View Post
That was an advert for a truck
I think it has been already discussed here...
Ad Nauseum (if you excuse the pun)

Anyway, they were checking people for radiation? I didn't notice them saying anywere that there was radiation present.
__________________
Numbers are not case sensitive. (me)
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 21-September-2007, 04:34 PM
John Kierein John Kierein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,851
Default

They need to save the water. Some of it could be from the comet itself and other stuff could be dissolved in it. It should be analyzed including looking for the ratio of heavy water to normal water. The tendency will be to just pump out the water and discard it.
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 21-September-2007, 09:09 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is online now
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 25,111
Default

Meteorite likely caused crater in Peru

Quote:
Peruvian astronomers said Thursday that evidence shows a meteorite crashed near Lake Titicaca over the weekend, leaving an elliptical crater and magnetic rock fragments in an impact powerful enough to register on seismic charts.

As other astronomers learned more details, they too said it appears likely that a legitimate meteorite hit Earth on Saturday — an rare occurence.
But the BA has another theory:

Quote:
But this one, maybe, has an even weirder explanation! In the newsgroup sci.space.history is a thread discussing this Peruvian event. One of the participants, Pat Flannery, has come up with a very interesting suggestion: this was no space rock, it was a Scud missile gone awry.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 22-September-2007, 04:50 AM
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,492
Default

Sticks toseeked ToSeek

Quote:
I think it has been already discussed here. Any hue, according to Phill, it may have been a scud missile
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 23-September-2007, 05:12 AM
JonClarke JonClarke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 2,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks View Post
Any hue, according to Phill, it may have been a scud missile

I think that's a fairly silly suggestion. There is no hard evidence that Peru actualkly has any Scuds, and, even they do have them, where are the missile fragments?

I still go for a large meteorite as the most likely explanation, followed by small phreato-magmatic event.

Jon
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 23-September-2007, 07:47 PM
Tube's Avatar
Tube Tube is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3
Default

I vote space junk, as Devo's prescient lyrics from 1978 indicate:

"it's falling fast Peru too"...
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 24-September-2007, 11:35 AM
JonClarke JonClarke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 2,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tube View Post
I vote space junk, as Devo's prescient lyrics from 1978 indicate:

"it's falling fast Peru too"...
Samples have been recovered indicating high iron content http://www.livinginperu.com/news-475...s-in-meteorite . I suggest it's now 99% certain this was a meteorite impact, the first crater known to have formed since Sikhote Alin in 1947.

Jon
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 24-September-2007, 02:29 PM
Trantor Trantor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 417
Default

Isn't Lake Titicaca a UFO base of operations.
Engine trouble perhaps?
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 24-September-2007, 10:28 PM
JonClarke JonClarke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 2,938
Default

So the largest known impact in 60 years is ignored and/or trivialised because it happened in Peru? Next time it should land in Idaho. Maybe then it would get the attention it deserves.

Jon
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 25-September-2007, 03:38 AM
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,492
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonClarke View Post
So the largest known impact in 60 years is ignored and/or trivialised because it happened in Peru? Next time it should land in Idaho. Maybe then it would get the attention it deserves.

Jon
Nevada
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 25-September-2007, 04:26 PM
R.A.F.'s Avatar
R.A.F. R.A.F. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,869
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonClarke View Post
So the largest known impact in 60 years is ignored and/or trivialised because it happened in Peru?
No...as I posted on the BA's BLOG, I'd just like to see a picture (perhaps with people standing at the rim) so I could judge how big this "crater" is.

If that seems unreasonable, then simply look at all of the different pictures taken of the "crater" and tell me "how big it is". I know I can't, and that (to me) seems very odd.
__________________
"The facts gentlemen, and nothing but the facts, for careful eyes are narrowly watching." Isaac Asimov
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 25-September-2007, 04:38 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 9,131
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.A.F. View Post
No...as I posted on the BA's BLOG, I'd just like to see a picture (perhaps with people standing at the rim) so I could judge how big this "crater" is.
ToSeeks' link has an image show with at least one picture with somebody standing at the rim.

Although, for the most part, the wide angle view on all the others does make things quite misleading.
__________________
Numbers are not case sensitive. (me)
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 25-September-2007, 06:48 PM
m1omg's Avatar
m1omg m1omg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,478
Default

Are there no green crystal around the impact site.At first I tought as a C&C fan that it must be a a tiberium meteor!That would alsob explain the sickness!Look how smart I am!
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 25-September-2007, 06:59 PM
R.A.F.'s Avatar
R.A.F. R.A.F. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,869
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEOWatcher View Post
ToSeeks' link has an image show with at least one picture with somebody standing at the rim.
Are you talking about this picture??

If so, how can you tell that they are actually standing "at" the rim? From what I can see, they could be standing 20/30 feet beyond it, and the photographer just "lined it up" to make it appear that they are "on the rim".

I'll admit it "looks" like they are at the rim, however keeping in mind all of the different (and in my opinion, purposefully deceptive) pictures I have looked at, and adding to that the fact that this whole thing has "smelt wrong" from the beginning, and I just really want to know that what I'm "suppose" to be seeing is actually what is there.

In other words, I'm still waiting for a "definitive" picture...hopefully it will "show up" within the next few days.
__________________
"The facts gentlemen, and nothing but the facts, for careful eyes are narrowly watching." Isaac Asimov
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 25-September-2007, 09:42 PM
JonClarke JonClarke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 2,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.A.F. View Post
I'll admit it "looks" like they are at the rim, however keeping in mind all of the different (and in my opinion, purposefully deceptive) pictures I have looked at...
What makes you think the photos are purposely deceptive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.A.F. View Post
and adding to that the fact that this whole thing has "smelt wrong" from the beginning, and I just really want to know that what I'm "suppose" to be seeing is actually what is there.
What smells wrong to you?

Jon
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 25-September-2007, 10:07 PM
R.A.F.'s Avatar
R.A.F. R.A.F. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,869
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonClarke View Post
What makes you think the photos are purposely deceptive?
Some of the pictures make the "crater" look gigantic, while others make it look small. They seem to have a problem (and they shouldn't have) taking a decent picture of the thing. That in and of itself is causing me to think that there is a reason why no decent pictures have been taken. On the BA's BLOG, another poster mentioned the "hogzilla" incident....where forced persective was used to make a hog appear larger than it actually was. Right now, I have no way of knowing that this isn't what's being done with this crater.

Like I said...I'm waiting for a "decent" picture to settle this.

Quote:
What smells wrong to you?
The crater just looks "wrong". I don't know how else to put it. I guess it's "look" could be because it came in awfully "slow", but...it just looks wrong.
__________________
"The facts gentlemen, and nothing but the facts, for careful eyes are narrowly watching." Isaac Asimov
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 25-September-2007, 11:23 PM
JonClarke JonClarke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 2,938
Default

It would be good to get more decent photos for sure. from experience it is actually quite hard to get decent photos of small craters, It's possible that some these are cropped telephoto images, that might explain some the apparently forced perspectives.

Some good measurements would be desirable too. The crater has been variously quoted as 30 m across and 6 m deep and 17 m across and 5 metres deep. Both are reasonable in siuze and proportion for a small impact. the crater has a rim (best seen the in video, and both the rim and the crater are composed of brecciated material. This is what you would expect from an impact.

Another thing worth mentioning is the shallow groundwater, the water table is only 3-4 m below the surface, judging by the photos. With the a capillary fringe another 50 cm above that it means that much of the crater has been excavated out of wet, or at least moist material. There have have already been some modification of crater form through slumping.

The video shows shome white coatings on the ejecta. This is consistent in colour and distribution with impact glass. It would be nice if this could be confirmed. (or disproved)

Jon
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 26-September-2007, 07:05 AM
eburacum45's Avatar
eburacum45 eburacum45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: old york
Posts: 5,356
Default

With the crater filled with groundwater, how would José Isitsuka have obtained a sample of the meteorite? Would a small portion have been ejected during the impact, or did someone slub around at the bottom of the crater?

The first meteoric crater since 1947 is a remarkable event, if true; and it looks like it may well be. However the reports of illness associated with the fall are almost certainly hysteria.
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 26-September-2007, 08:45 AM
JonClarke JonClarke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 2,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eburacum45 View Post
With the crater filled with groundwater, how would José Isitsuka have obtained a sample of the meteorite? Would a small portion have been ejected during the impact, or did someone slub around at the bottom of the crater?
The meteorite will disintegrate into many small fragments which will be scattered across a wide area. This is what happened at Sikhote-Alin and also Wabar, Henbury, and other small impacts. You can buy fragments of these meteorites on the internet as a result.


Quote:
Originally Posted by eburacum45 View Post
The first meteoric crater since 1947 is a remarkable event, if true; and it looks like it may well be. However the reports of illness associated with the fall are almost certainly hysteria.
Quite probably. If something that large fell near me I would probably be a bit neurotic as well!

However, if the groundwater was rich in arsenic, there is the possibility of arsenine being released. If the meteorite was a carbonaceous chondrite there is the possibility of hydrogen cyanide and hydrogen sulphide being produced. So I would not completely rule it out. reemember, we have not been this close to an impact before. As I recall it was some weeks after event that the first ground parties reached the Sikhote Alin site because of its remoteness, although it had been spotted from the air within a few hours.

Jon
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 26-September-2007, 11:57 AM
JonClarke JonClarke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 2,938
Default

For comparison, here are some photos of the Sikhote-Alin craters http://www.spacerocksinc.com/SIKHOTE...ALL_PAGE3.html
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 26-September-2007, 12:51 PM
John Kierein John Kierein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,851
Default

Maybe the arenic comes from gallium arsenide solar panels superheated by re-entry. or not.
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 26-September-2007, 09:05 PM
JonClarke JonClarke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 2,938
Default

I don't think anyone has direct evidence for arsenic. It is just one possible physical explanation for the reported illness. Andean waters are often high in arsenic because of leaching of hydrothermal deposits. But it is a hypothesis only. I suspect that the most likely cause of illness is the shock of having something like this come down in your back yard.

There is no evidence that this is a satellite reentry. No fragments of machined alloys mentioned. There are reports of chrondritic material and metallic iron. All evidence for a meteorite.

Jon
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Large meteorite seen during solar observations Elias Astronomy 5 18-August-2005 04:25 PM
Testing Astrophysical conditions on Earth dgruss23 Against the Mainstream 59 14-March-2005 02:32 PM
re. Large crater on Titan imaged by radar banquo's_bumble_puppy Astronomy 0 17-February-2005 12:36 PM
Alternate Methods for the Origin of Craters JESMKS Against the Mainstream 9 20-March-2004 04:24 PM
possible large meteor crater aurorae Astronomy 8 24-April-2003 02:18 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today