Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-January-2008, 03:16 AM
missmoo missmoo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 3
Default Telescope on the Far Side of the Moon

(Not sure if this is the right thread for this, but I hope so..)

I have always wondered if this was a practical idea, to build a telescope on the far side of the moon.

It seems to me that this will solve a lot of problems with "background noise" from the earth, it will be further out to see further into the universe, and at least half a month it will have no radiation from the sun. Of course.. the other half it will be toasted crisp but we could probably use that to just stare at our sun with less disruption from the atmosphere...

Anyways, is this possible? is it a good idea, or is it a waste of funds? What do you guys think?

Cheers,

moo
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-January-2008, 04:41 AM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 11,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by missmoo View Post
It seems to me that this will solve a lot of problems with "background noise" from the earth, it will be further out to see further into the universe, and at least half a month it will have no radiation from the sun. Of course.. the other half it will be toasted crisp but we could probably use that to just stare at our sun with less disruption from the atmosphere...
The far side would probably be good for radio telescopes. Wikipedia: Far side of the Moon

Quote:
Because the far side of the Moon is shielded from radio transmissions from the Earth, it is considered a good location for placing radio telescopes for use by astronomers. Small, bowl-shaped craters provide a natural formation for a stationary telescope similar to Arecibo in Puerto Rico. For much larger-scale telescopes, the 100-kilometer diameter crater Daedalus is situated near the center of the far side, and the 3 km-high rim would help to block stray communications from orbiting satellites. Another potential candidate for a radio telescope is the Saha crater.

Before deploying radio telescopes to the far side, several problems must be overcome. The fine lunar dust can contaminate equipment, vehicles, and space suits. The conducting materials used for the radio dishes must also be carefully shielded against the effects of solar flares. Finally the area about the telescopes must be protected against contamination by other radio sources.
NASA's given some thought to putting optical telescopes on the moon, but the near side is probably more convenient and just as effective. With no atmosphere, light pollution isn't such a big deal -- except for the really bright lights like the sun and earth close to where you want to look.

NASA: Lunar exploration science



Quote:
Various other plans to return to the moon include the development of a lunar telescope [...]
NASA: Ask an Astrophysicist :: Astronomy From the Moon

Quote:
Would you have by any chance any information on possible NASA projects as regards observing from the Moon? Would the dark side of the moon be a good place for a telescope?
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-January-2008, 10:09 PM
aurora's Avatar
aurora aurora is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,683
Default

One other comment, regarding:

Quote:
Originally Posted by missmoo View Post
it will be further out to see further into the universe,
The distance from the Earth to the Moon is miniscule compared to the distance to all other objects.
__________________
"I'm as accurate as any psychic. And I'm a cartoon!" -- Squidward

"Arrrgh, the laws of physics be a harsh mistress!" -- Bender
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 14-January-2008, 05:56 AM
Centaur's Avatar
Centaur Centaur is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 277
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by missmoo View Post
I have always wondered if this was a practical idea, to build a telescope on the far side of the moon.
That was an idea championed by 19th century astronomers. They did not consider the possibility of telescopes in near Earth orbit. Something like the Hubble is far easier to put in place, control and maintain than a Moon based telescope. It's also a lot cheaper.
__________________
Curt Renz - "Centaur"
For monthly astronomical calendar visit:
www.CurtRenz.com/astronomical.html

Last edited by Centaur; 15-January-2008 at 05:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 15-January-2008, 11:57 AM
geonuc's Avatar
geonuc geonuc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,658
Default

I guess we'd also need a lunar satellite to relay images and data back to Earth?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 15-January-2008, 12:14 PM
AndreasJ's Avatar
AndreasJ AndreasJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Linköping, Sweden
Posts: 338
Send a message via ICQ to AndreasJ Send a message via Skype™ to AndreasJ
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geonuc View Post
I guess we'd also need a lunar satellite to relay images and data back to Earth?
You may want to put the relaying station at one of the Lagrange points (L4 or L5) - that way it can be above the telescope's horizon permanently.

Another possibility I've heard suggested is to lay an optic cable on the Moon that stretches over to a relaying station on the Nearside. Sounds pointlessly expensive to me.
__________________
"Illuminati's Razor - The most complicatedly evil answer is usually the most correct answer."
-- Fazor
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
October 2006 AstroCalendar Dave Mitsky Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories 0 01-October-2006 03:05 PM
Does the Moon really rotate? LayMan Questions and Answers 170 21-September-2006 03:24 PM
Atomic bomb on moon suntrack2 Questions and Answers 54 28-November-2005 05:34 PM
Moon Noorth 2004 Against the Mainstream 6 29-July-2004 05:03 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today