Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 19-August-2003, 05:48 PM
jokergirl's Avatar
jokergirl jokergirl is online now
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,483
Default Ion Drive

In the latest BA newsletter, the BA claimed the ion drive worked with "powerful magnets". This made me wonder and I checked the technical info on the page that was linked in this post.

What I found was (quoted from HERE):

Quote:
The PPS-1350 is a very compact device built around an annular ceramic chamber 10 cm in diameter ringed with magnets. Attached to one side is a device called a cathode which creates electrons. The electrons are attracted into the chamber by another device called an anode. Trapped inside the chamber by a magnetic field, the electrons collide with the incoming xenon gas and form Xenon ions, positively charged particles and more electrons. These electrons are then used again to accelerate the ions, which rush out of the chamber accelerated by the electric field created by the electrons from the cathode. It is this ion beam, with a characteristic blue colour because of the xenon, that creates the thrust to push the spacecraft forwards.
Now I'm even more confused.

Am I too stupid or is this thing at best overly simplified?

Now, apart from a cathode that apparently "creates" electrons (Hey, I want to be able to do this too! Then my energy bill wouldn't be such a problem anymore...),

the "electrons collide with the incoming xenon gas and form Xenon ions, positively charged particles and more electrons" ???

Is there some sort of small CERN in this device? Or can anyone explain to me (or give me a better link) how this is supposed to work? :-k


jokergirl
__________________
Si tacuisses, philosophus mansisses.

"Half of what I say is meaningless, but I say it so that the other half may reach you."
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 19-August-2003, 06:59 PM
Hamlet's Avatar
Hamlet Hamlet is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,135
Default Re: Ion Drive

Quote:
Originally Posted by jokergirl
In the latest BA newsletter, the BA claimed the ion drive worked with "powerful magnets". This made me wonder and I checked the technical info on the page that was linked in this post.

What I found was (quoted from HERE):

Quote:
The PPS-1350 is a very compact device built around an annular ceramic chamber 10 cm in diameter ringed with magnets. Attached to one side is a device called a cathode which creates electrons. The electrons are attracted into the chamber by another device called an anode. Trapped inside the chamber by a magnetic field, the electrons collide with the incoming xenon gas and form Xenon ions, positively charged particles and more electrons. These electrons are then used again to accelerate the ions, which rush out of the chamber accelerated by the electric field created by the electrons from the cathode. It is this ion beam, with a characteristic blue colour because of the xenon, that creates the thrust to push the spacecraft forwards.
Now I'm even more confused.

Am I too stupid or is this thing at best overly simplified?

Now, apart from a cathode that apparently "creates" electrons (Hey, I want to be able to do this too! Then my energy bill wouldn't be such a problem anymore...),

the "electrons collide with the incoming xenon gas and form Xenon ions, positively charged particles and more electrons" ???

Is there some sort of small CERN in this device? Or can anyone explain to me (or give me a better link) how this is supposed to work? :-k


jokergirl
I'll give it a try. In a sense it is a small partical collider. The cathode is similar to the cathode in your T.V. A current is run through the cathode causing it to be heated . The electrons "boil off" and are accelerated by a magnetic field and then collided with the xenon gas. The collision causes one or more of the xenon atom's electrons to be knocked out of its orbit leaving the xenon atom with a net positive charge. The electrons are not "created" in the sense of from nothing. They come from the cathode and from the xenon atoms themselves. Since the xenon atoms now have a positive charge, an electric field can be used to accelerate them.

I'm sure others can give more details of how the total process works.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 19-August-2003, 07:34 PM
Mirar Mirar is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7
Default

Last time I read about it, you couldn't accelerate electrons with a magnetic field; you rather needed a (static) electric field. =^.^=

I guess it's safe to assume that "positively charged particles" are the same particles as the "xenon ions", but how does the process of knocking off electrons work? Doesn't that require a very high energy state? Are the electrons accelerated so much as to give that high energy state in a collision?

It seems to me there must be lots of energy put into the system somewhere; where does that come from? From solar panels or a fusion plant, or do the ion drive leave a lot of leftover energy? (The pages say solar panels, but it doesn't seem to me that they could give the needed energy alone.)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 19-August-2003, 08:26 PM
Hamlet's Avatar
Hamlet Hamlet is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirar
Last time I read about it, you couldn't accelerate electrons with a magnetic field; you rather needed a (static) electric field. =^.^=
The electrons are accelerated by an electric field, much the same way that electrons are accelerated in your television's cathode ray tube. The magnetic field mentioned in the article may be for some kind of temporary containment, but I'm not sure.

Quote:
I guess it's safe to assume that "positively charged particles" are the same particles as the "xenon ions", but how does the process of knocking off electrons work? Doesn't that require a very high energy state? Are the electrons accelerated so much as to give that high energy state in a collision?
Yes. The positively charge particles are the xenon ions. Xenon is a fairly heavy element and its outer electrons are weakly bound. The electrons from the cathode collide with the xenon atoms at kick out 1 or more of those weakly bound electrons, giving the xenon atom a net positive charge. The xenon ion can then be accelerated in an electric field and thrown out the back of the engine. I believe the electrons are ejected too so as not to create a net negative charge on the engine.

Quote:
It seems to me there must be lots of energy put into the system somewhere; where does that come from? From solar panels or a fusion plant, or do the ion drive leave a lot of leftover energy? (The pages say solar panels, but it doesn't seem to me that they could give the needed energy alone.)
NASA's DS-1 probe got its power from solar panels. The engines built and tested so far are fairly small and not very powerful. Their big advantage is that they are efficient and can run continuously for long periods of time allowing velocity to slowly build up. For bigger engines and more thrust you'd probably have to go to some other type of power source.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 19-August-2003, 08:39 PM
Hamlet's Avatar
Hamlet Hamlet is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,135
Default

Here is a link that does a better job of explaining the ion engine than I did. The sidebar specifically has some good information.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 21-August-2003, 02:48 AM
tracer tracer is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Silicon Valley, CA, USA
Posts: 2,130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirar
Last time I read about it, you couldn't accelerate electrons with a magnetic field; you rather needed a (static) electric field. =^.^=
Tell that to the people who build cyclotrons. :P

Seriously, though, remember that the electrons aren't just sitting there -- they come off of the cathode with a little bit of initial speed. When a moving charged particle passes through a magnetic field, it accelerates in a direction perpendicular to the magnetic field lines. If the magnetic field is static, the charged particle will only whirl about in a little circle without going any faster, but if the magnetic field is changing, the charged particles moving through it can be accelerated in such a way thay they actually pick up speed.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 23-August-2003, 12:47 AM
mike alexander's Avatar
mike alexander mike alexander is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: McMinnville, Oregon
Posts: 10,058
Default

Quote:
If the magnetic field is static, the charged particle will only whirl about in a little circle without going any faster, but if the magnetic field is changing, the charged particles moving through it can be accelerated in such a way thay they actually pick up speed.
But...but wait! That means...if I took some magnets and spun them around near a supply of electrons... I could make the electrons move! And if I could, say, trap the electrons in, say, a wire, then I could...

Holy cow! this could be BIG...

8)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today