|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
A or B?
__________________
For those inclined to oppose human meddling with the structure of the universe or the composition and configuration of objects and groups of objects within the universe, consider: Whether there is a limit to the magnitude of a modulation of chaos below which order remains invariant? Or, is order but a fiction invented by perspectives applied over finite, however large, time intervals? |
|
||||
|
Don't know if it will help: Extrasolar Visions has some star maps from Proxima Centauri B at Extrasolar Visions :: Proxima Centauri b (and maybe from other nearby bodies at the site).
I'm not even sure I spot Alpha Centauri (or Rigil Kent) from there -- must only be about 10000 AU distant. Maybe the name collided with another, though. Still, nothing stands out as a bright nearby neighbor though -- nothing like bright Sirius or Canopus. In the reverse view, were it to be available there (I didn't look), from Alpha Centauri it might be really hard to spot the dimmer Proxima. But, the generated star maps could be junk. I don't know how reliable they are. Edit: I took another look at the maps and noticed the title/description: "centering on Rigil Kentaurus system". Perhaps that is why I'm not seeing members of the Alpha Centauri system: they are all sort of under my feet.
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0.... Last edited by 01101001; 30-March-2008 at 07:33 PM. |
|
|||
|
Proxima is 0.21 ly away from the A and B which is about 1/20 its distance to the Sun. So it is 400 times or about 6.5 magnitudes brighter. Proxima being a 11th magnitude star that gives 4.5, not a very unusual sight for the casual observer.
__________________
"The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity." Dorothy Parker (?) Last edited by Eckelston; 30-March-2008 at 06:19 PM. Reason: clarification |
|
||||
|
From AC2, Proxima would be the third brightest star in the sky. It would be brighter than any star in our system. From Proxima, the Alpha Centauri, A and B, would appear as one star, geting brighter and dimmer as they orbit eachother.
This, I got from Celestia. And Sirius is in the Orion constellation. Check out Extra Solar Skies
__________________
Fields of Space LOGIC, n. The art of thinking and reasoning in strict accordance with the limitations and incapacities of the human misunderstanding. In the Year 2525. "One small step for (a) man. One giant leap for mankind". If an astronaut doesn't need good grammar, niether does you. Host of Seraphim |
|
|||
|
Are you sure you're not looking at the nearest stars list? I tried the same and it said Proxima's apparent magnitude is 4.63, not among the 500 brightest stars visible from Alpha Centauri B.
__________________
"The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity." Dorothy Parker (?) |
|
|||
|
Yes, at mag 4.63, Proxima is fairly dim in the skies of the Alpha Cen pair, though it would be naked-eye visible. SolStation says that flares "roughly double" its brightness, which would take it into the third magnitude (assuming that "brightness" refers to visual luminosity).
It appears in the constellation of Taurus, a little to the southwest of Aldebaran and the Hyades. Grant Hutchison |
|
|||
|
hey, Kai, aren't you on assignment from Alpha Centauri?
what do things look like from there?
__________________
"blacker than the blackest black... times infinity."- Nathan Explosion The.. Best.. Thread..Ever... |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis Rovers forever! - ToSeek "Carl Sagan sent a message to ET, Neil Armstrong walked in the Sea of Tranquility Steve Squyers built Spirit and Opportunity Dan Haylen upchucked in zero gravity." -Brent Simon, The Space Camp Song |
|
|||
|
Here's a visual magnitude javascript calculator I made:
http://orbitsimulator.com/gravity/articles/vmag9.html Plug in 0.21 LY for d (distance) and 15.49 for M (absolute magnitude), and you'll get a visual mag of 4.53. This is a good question, as it illustrates just how dim red dwarfs are. Even from within its own star system, it is not a standout. And although being the closest star to the Sun, it is not visible to the naked eye.
__________________
www.gravitysimulator.com |
|
||||
|
The following is something I like to play around with when wondering what such-and-suck looks like from where ever.
http://www.astronexus.com/node/69 |
|
||||
|
I was thinking of the 26 Draconis system, which is similar to the AC3 system.
http://www.extrasolar.net/starmaphip...c=90&rashift=0
__________________
Fields of Space LOGIC, n. The art of thinking and reasoning in strict accordance with the limitations and incapacities of the human misunderstanding. In the Year 2525. "One small step for (a) man. One giant leap for mankind". If an astronaut doesn't need good grammar, niether does you. Host of Seraphim |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are Proxima and Alpha Centauri Gravitationally Bound? | Blob | Astronomy | 5 | 20-July-2006 09:50 AM |
| Discussion: Audio: Alpha, Still the Same ... | Fraser | Universe Today Story Comments | 9 | 28-April-2005 03:29 PM |
| Proxima Centauri part of a ternary System or No. | VTBoy | Astronomy | 5 | 16-February-2004 10:49 PM |
| Proxima Centauri | Tim Thompson | Astronomy | 24 | 29-April-2003 05:44 AM |
| Redshifts are cosmological: the Lyman Alpha Forest and Arp | The Bad Astronomer | Against the Mainstream | 77 | 09-February-2003 09:00 PM |