Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-April-2008, 10:19 PM
pie33 pie33 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 49
Default Nothing out there.

How could a universe be without advanced civilizations living on their home planets?

What if the drake equation is a trick question, in which we are the only pre-type I civilization in the universe. The drake equation is not false, because we are here on earth, and the answer will always be 1. However, there is no evidence for advanced civilizations elsewhere in the universe.

With the great silence from 35 years of seti, no evidence of dyson spheres on Hubble’s telescope and Fermi's paradoxical question of "where are they," events, and time may be foretelling us something of our absolute loneliness in the universe.

With no evidence of probes in orbit or in our prehistoric past. - It appears that we have not been visited by advanced civilizations because we are freaks of nature, and there is no such thing as advanced civilizations in the universe, because we are it.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-April-2008, 11:27 PM
evan.aavso evan.aavso is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everett
Posts: 28
Send a message via Skype™ to evan.aavso
Default

well who said that intelligent civilizations haven't sent back a signal yet? and it hasn't reach us? to many people are being optimistic about the SETI program.. the chances of making contact are slim, as been studied and debated for over 30 years.. i dont think you can expect anything just after 30 years of searching.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-April-2008, 11:28 PM
Premodial Premodial is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: everett,wa
Posts: 23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by evan.aavso View Post
well who said that intelligent civilizations haven't sent back a signal yet? and it hasn't reach us? to many people are being optimistic about the SETI program.. the chances of making contact are slim, as been studied and debated for over 30 years.. i dont think you can expect anything just after 30 years of searching.
agreed!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-April-2008, 02:14 AM
KaiYeves's Avatar
KaiYeves KaiYeves is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Currently on assignment on planet shown in avatar photo
Posts: 10,024
Default

Yes, we must keep searching.
__________________
I want to go back to the moon.
I don't care which rocket you use, whichever one you pick, I'll like it, I swear.

"If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis
Rovers forever! - ToSeek
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-April-2008, 06:46 AM
Neverfly's Avatar
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth, Texas
Posts: 13,391
Send a message via Yahoo to Neverfly
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pie33 View Post
How could a universe be without advanced civilizations living on their home planets?

What if the drake equation is a trick question, in which we are the only pre-type I civilization in the universe. The drake equation is not false, because we are here on earth, and the answer will always be 1. However, there is no evidence for advanced civilizations elsewhere in the universe.

With the great silence from 35 years of seti, no evidence of dyson spheres on Hubble’s telescope and Fermi's paradoxical question of "where are they," events, and time may be foretelling us something of our absolute loneliness in the universe.

With no evidence of probes in orbit or in our prehistoric past. - It appears that we have not been visited by advanced civilizations because we are freaks of nature, and there is no such thing as advanced civilizations in the universe, because we are it.
Bear in mind too, we are only able to 'see' the very local.
Even Hubble can only see so far... and the further out it looks, the longer that light has been traveling to us. Like looking bac in time.

Our own E.M. radiation barely makes it out past the outer fringe of the solar system. Even if someone is out there with a SETI of their own- they are not likely to pick up our E.M. any time soon. It would be extremely weak and degraded to the point of non existence before it reached the nearest star.

We can discover extra-solar planets, but only by measuring gravitational effects. Not direct observation. Most of the ones we have found are bigger than Jupiter.

So, realistically, at our current technology, the odds of us seeing anyone or being seen are actually very slim.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-April-2008, 11:19 AM
Kullat Nunu's Avatar
Kullat Nunu Kullat Nunu is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,809
Send a message via MSN to Kullat Nunu Send a message via Skype™ to Kullat Nunu
Default

Yes, but this doesn't explain the Fermi paradox: if intelligent life is common, why they're not here? Assuming that none of the civilizations haven't decided to colonize the Milky Way over the billions of years when intelligent life has been possible is far-fetched. Interstellar distances and vast timespans are not a problem for a highly resilient or mechanical entities.

Either they don't exist, or we understand the advanced civilizations fundamentally wrong. I suspect the latter. No doubt that our view of how advanced civilizations ought to operate is hopelessly naive.
__________________
Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool.
-- Richard Feynman
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-April-2008, 11:40 AM
geonuc's Avatar
geonuc geonuc is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 3,837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kullat Nunu View Post
Interstellar distances and vast timespans are not a problem for a highly resilient or mechanical entities.
Well, I'd consider humans to be fairly intelligent, as life forms go, and interstellar distances look pretty challenging to me.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-April-2008, 11:42 AM
Neverfly's Avatar
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth, Texas
Posts: 13,391
Send a message via Yahoo to Neverfly
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kullat Nunu View Post
Yes, but this doesn't explain the Fermi paradox: if intelligent life is common, why they're not here?
I could really misinterpret that

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kullat Nunu View Post
Assuming that none of the civilizations haven't decided to colonize the Milky Way over the billions of years when intelligent life has been possible is far-fetched. Interstellar distances and vast timespans are not a problem for a highly resilient or mechanical entities.
Maybe. But there are pretty severe limits to what we can "see" even in our neighborhood. Add to that the vast distances between galaxies and the vast number of galaxies... It's pretty danged unlikely that anyone is close enough for us to talk to.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kullat Nunu View Post
Either they don't exist, or we understand the advanced civilizations fundamentally wrong. I suspect the latter. No doubt that our view of how advanced civilizations ought to operate is hopelessly naive.
Or maybe we just can't see them yet.
Let's be realistic about the sizes and distances and timeline that we are currently able to observe.

Right now, we can't even tell if there is life on Europa- and that's pretty close!

Over distances- we are looking back in time. Add to that, we may not see the machines or markers of an advanced civilization- even if it's only a few hundred light years away.

From Alpha Centuri, would an observer be able to tell if there was any life on Earth at all? Most likely not. We are tiny, our EM radiation barely significant if noticable-
Our machines in space would be as easy to spot as a molecule of oil in the ocean.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-April-2008, 12:46 PM
geonuc's Avatar
geonuc geonuc is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 3,837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
Right now, we can't even tell if there is life on Europa- and that's pretty close!
Good point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
Over distances- we are looking back in time. Add to that, we may not see the machines or markers of an advanced civilization- even if it's only a few hundred light years away.
Another good point.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-April-2008, 03:38 PM
Trantor Trantor is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 426
Default

I'm sure that somewhere out there, probably in our own galaxy, there are other intelligent beings who are saying the same thing - "there's nothing out there".
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-April-2008, 07:03 PM
Kaptain K's Avatar
Kaptain K Kaptain K is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elgin, Tx
Posts: 7,674
Default

Quote:
From Alpha Centuri, would an observer be able to tell if there was any life on Earth at all?
To a civilization just a little more advanced than us, from Alpha Centauri, Earth with its 21% O2 atmosphere would stick out like a floodlit sign saying here is life!
__________________
Any day you wake up on "the right side of the dirt" is a good day.

T. Anderson
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-April-2008, 08:19 PM
Amber Robot's Avatar
Amber Robot Amber Robot is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pie33 View Post
With the great silence from 35 years of seti, no evidence of dyson spheres on Hubble’s telescope and Fermi's paradoxical question of "where are they," events, and time may be foretelling us something of our absolute loneliness in the universe.
The fallacy of the SETI project is that we are searching for signals that we ourselves are unwilling to send out. Should the other civilizations be similarly inclined then no one will ever be heard.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 02:52 AM
BigDon's Avatar
BigDon BigDon is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 5,845
Default

You know, it could be just too soon.

We like to think the Universe has been around a long time, because it has as far as we're concerned. 13 billion years IS forever to humans. But the Universe is easily expected to get to be a trillion years old (1000 billion) and may reach 3 trillion (3 thousand billion!) before the laws of reality change markly from present day observation.

Anybody see what I'm getting at here?

Somebody has to be first. I know science has gone a long way to prove we are not "special" in the Universe.

What, we (the Universe where Spock is clean shaven) are just now getting into our third generation of stellar formation? I'll worry about the lack of other civilizations at around the 500 billion year mark. I bet we will be full then. And they will wonder who was first. And have absolutely no way of knowing it was us.

Just wait for it. I bet I'm right.
__________________
In your rush to call everyone "entrenched" or closed-minded or "limited" you fail to note that the "limit" here has a very natural boundary: that point at which the evidence stops. - JayUtah

Science fiction was never meant to be an educational tool. - Editor Amazing Tales
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 04:48 AM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaptain K View Post
To a civilization just a little more advanced than us, from Alpha Centauri, Earth with its 21% O2 atmosphere would stick out like a floodlit sign saying here is life!
...Assuming that's what their planet's life uses.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
"The Mayan symbol for "book" looks a lot like a triple hamburger, but I've never seen them claiming it as proof the Mayans had Big Macs." - KaiYeves
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 05:05 AM
Kaptain K's Avatar
Kaptain K Kaptain K is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elgin, Tx
Posts: 7,674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noclevername View Post
...Assuming that's what their planet's life uses.
No! I'm assuming that they have brains and know how to use them.

If we find a planet a similar percentage of chlorine or flouring, we will be just as certain that there is life there and for the same reason!
__________________
Any day you wake up on "the right side of the dirt" is a good day.

T. Anderson
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 05:08 AM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaptain K View Post
No! I'm assuming that they have brains and know how to use them.

If we find a planet a similar percentage of chlorine or flouring, we will be just as certain that there is life there and for the same reason!
Or that some other chemical process is at work. We can't jump to hasty conclusions, it's science, not blogging.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
"The Mayan symbol for "book" looks a lot like a triple hamburger, but I've never seen them claiming it as proof the Mayans had Big Macs." - KaiYeves
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 05:19 AM
Kaptain K's Avatar
Kaptain K Kaptain K is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elgin, Tx
Posts: 7,674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noclevername View Post
Or that some other chemical process is at work. We can't jump to hasty conclusions, it's science, not blogging.
This is basic chemistry. It is (more than) fairly well understood. Do you know what happens if you mix hydrogen and fluorine (in the dark, by the way) and expose it to direct sunlight?
__________________
Any day you wake up on "the right side of the dirt" is a good day.

T. Anderson
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 05:35 AM
FriedPhoton's Avatar
FriedPhoton FriedPhoton is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Event Horizon
Posts: 518
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDon View Post
You know, it could be just too soon.

We like to think the Universe has been around a long time, because it has as far as we're concerned. 13 billion years IS forever to humans. But the Universe is easily expected to get to be a trillion years old (1000 billion) and may reach 3 trillion (3 thousand billion!) before the laws of reality change markly from present day observation.

Anybody see what I'm getting at here?

Somebody has to be first. I know science has gone a long way to prove we are not "special" in the Universe.

What, we (the Universe where Spock is clean shaven) are just now getting into our third generation of stellar formation? I'll worry about the lack of other civilizations at around the 500 billion year mark. I bet we will be full then. And they will wonder who was first. And have absolutely no way of knowing it was us.

Just wait for it. I bet I'm right.
I've got a dollar that says you're wrong!
__________________
The only way of finding the limits of the possible is by going beyond them into the impossible.

Arthur C. Clarke


The Brain Science Podcast
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 05:37 AM
FriedPhoton's Avatar
FriedPhoton FriedPhoton is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Event Horizon
Posts: 518
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
We can discover extra-solar planets, but only by measuring gravitational effects. Not direct observation. Most of the ones we have found are bigger than Jupiter.
We have direct observations of some now. Look up brown dwarf on wikipedia, you'll be happy to see an image. Cool stuff.
__________________
The only way of finding the limits of the possible is by going beyond them into the impossible.

Arthur C. Clarke


The Brain Science Podcast
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 05:58 AM
Neverfly's Avatar
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth, Texas
Posts: 13,391
Send a message via Yahoo to Neverfly
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FriedPhoton View Post
We have direct observations of some now. Look up brown dwarf on wikipedia, you'll be happy to see an image. Cool stuff.
ROCK on!
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 07:03 AM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaptain K View Post
This is basic chemistry. It is (more than) fairly well understood. Do you know what happens if you mix hydrogen and fluorine (in the dark, by the way) and expose it to direct sunlight?
I know what happens under Earth conditions.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
"The Mayan symbol for "book" looks a lot like a triple hamburger, but I've never seen them claiming it as proof the Mayans had Big Macs." - KaiYeves
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 10:55 AM
Kaptain K's Avatar
Kaptain K Kaptain K is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elgin, Tx
Posts: 7,674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noclevername View Post
I know what happens under Earth conditions.
Huh? We have different laws here?

You mix fluorine and hydrogen and expose it to the light of a G type star (any G type star) and it will go boom! If you use chlorine, you'd have to step up to an A type star to get the same result.
__________________
Any day you wake up on "the right side of the dirt" is a good day.

T. Anderson
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 01:20 PM
Kullat Nunu's Avatar
Kullat Nunu Kullat Nunu is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,809
Send a message via MSN to Kullat Nunu Send a message via Skype™ to Kullat Nunu
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geonuc View Post
Well, I'd consider humans to be fairly intelligent, as life forms go, and interstellar distances look pretty challenging to me.
We may be intelligent, but biologically resilient we are not.

Remember that other civilizations vastly older, and vastly more advanced. It is not difficult to imagine a genetically-engineered or mechanical entity that could travel interstellar distances that take thousands of years to complete. If one "hop" from a system to another takes, say, a ten thousand years the Milky Way could have been colonized ages ago.
__________________
Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool.
-- Richard Feynman
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 01:44 PM
Kullat Nunu's Avatar
Kullat Nunu Kullat Nunu is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,809
Send a message via MSN to Kullat Nunu Send a message via Skype™ to Kullat Nunu
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
Maybe. But there are pretty severe limits to what we can "see" even in our neighborhood. Add to that the vast distances between galaxies and the vast number of galaxies... It's pretty danged unlikely that anyone is close enough for us to talk to.
Yes, to say we have limited observing abilities is quite an understatement.

Fermi's point is that if intelligent life is very common, and given the huge timespan our planet should have been colonized by aliens. The possibilities why that hasn't happened, are that (1) they all have decided not to become colonizers, (2) interstellar travel is impossible (unlikely) or (3) they don't exist.

At first thought (1) seems plausible since one would think that aliens are smart enough not to become invading pests. However only one invading civilization is enough to colonize the Milky Way throughly, in a small fraction of time it has existed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
Right now, we can't even tell if there is life on Europa- and that's pretty close!
"Non-intelligent" life is pretty invisible. Our stellar neighbors could have many planets full of dinosaurs and we couldn't know that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
Over distances- we are looking back in time. Add to that, we may not see the machines or markers of an advanced civilization- even if it's only a few hundred light years away.
Time isn't problem. The Milky Way has been here for over ten billion years, and conditions ready for intelligent life must have existed for a few billion years, when enough metals were produced by stars. From Fermi's point of view, somebody must have eventually come here and [insert the alien's planet name here]formed our planet.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
From Alpha Centuri, would an observer be able to tell if there was any life on Earth at all? Most likely not. We are tiny, our EM radiation barely significant if noticable-
Our machines in space would be as easy to spot as a molecule of oil in the ocean.
Our radio-loud civilization has existed only a few decades. And interestingly, our "shout" is becoming weaker!
__________________
Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool.
-- Richard Feynman
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 01:55 PM
Kullat Nunu's Avatar
Kullat Nunu Kullat Nunu is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,809
Send a message via MSN to Kullat Nunu Send a message via Skype™ to Kullat Nunu
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDon View Post
Somebody has to be first. I know science has gone a long way to prove we are not "special" in the Universe.
Imagine that our civilization becomes a galactic empire of quadrillion or whatever citizens and which lasts of many million of years. That means we would be among the very first people that have existed. Which is incredible unlikely. Which means its unlikely that there would be no galactic empire. Or so the logic goes.

----

You might be interested in this book by Stephen Webb. He introduces 50 different explanations for the Fermi paradox. Some are sensible, some are ludicrous. His own explanation is compelling, yet depressing. You can peek the book here.
__________________
Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool.
-- Richard Feynman
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 07:26 PM
Teabinge's Avatar
Teabinge Teabinge is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 43
Default Why transport bodies

Why should technologically advanced alien civilizations bother to transport their biological bodies all the way to other stars? If there are no worm holes or warp drives (or similar) interstellar travel still is veeeery resource consuming. And slow.

Like a snail about to cross the Sahara desert. Takes a lot of motivation.

An advanced technology could presumably rather easily find out about the Universe by other means: Superadvanced astronomical methods, superadvanced robotics with advanced AI or something else.
If they are at all interested in the Universe.

I think this expectation of aliens that travel around the galaxy is a matter of projecting our own features onto the aliens.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 10:38 PM
Kullat Nunu's Avatar
Kullat Nunu Kullat Nunu is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,809
Send a message via MSN to Kullat Nunu Send a message via Skype™ to Kullat Nunu
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teabinge View Post
I think this expectation of aliens that travel around the galaxy is a matter of projecting our own features onto the aliens.
Agreed. I hope that is the reason for the silence and the solution for the Fermi paradox; that advanced civilizations do something we can't even possibly imagine.

The other obvious solution, that they don't exist is too depressing and is strongly against the Copernican principle.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teabinge View Post
Why should technologically advanced alien civilizations bother to transport their biological bodies all the way to other stars? If there are no worm holes or warp drives (or similar) interstellar travel still is veeeery resource consuming.
Who knows? Energy shouldn't be problem to a highly advanced civilization. Especially if you don't need to travel fast.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teabinge View Post
And slow.
No problem if you hardly notice a thousand years passing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teabinge View Post
... superadvanced robotics...
In an advanced civilization there's probably no distinction between an individual and a robot. Send a robot is the same as sending one of them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teabinge View Post
If they are at all interested in the Universe.
If you're not interested in exploring, it is unlikely that you're interested in developing technology in the first place. The will of exploration must be one of the basic requirements for a civilization-building species.

The problem is, as I said, that even if aliens are not interested in interstellar travel it takes only one civilization to colonize the Galaxy. In a few million years, if they decide not to hurry.
__________________
Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool.
-- Richard Feynman
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 12-April-2008, 02:58 AM
pie33 pie33 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 49
Default

There may be a slight chance that of all the UFO sightings, 1 or 2 may have been sneak and peek of earth by a brackwell probe.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 12-April-2008, 03:18 AM
RalofTyr's Avatar
RalofTyr RalofTyr is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Galaxy Mildromida
Posts: 1,086
Default

The Drake equation is for detecting other civilizations out there. However, "Civilization" is only a human term. Not all intelligent life requires, culture, song, dance and radio signals to thrive. An alien species with a society similar to ants could have or is colonizing half of the galaxy right now. They figured out how to build a rocket through a caste system and they've been building rockets and colonizing new worlds for milions of years now. They don't send out any signals to other aliens out there. How does that help them to survive?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaptain K View Post
To a civilization just a little more advanced than us, from Alpha Centauri, Earth with its 21% O2 atmosphere would stick out like a floodlit sign saying here is life!
Because the aliens on Alpha Centauri 2a are more interested in converted the abundant solar energy into biological energy as they are something similar to bacteria. Earth is flooding their world with radio signals. They don't care. They can't use that for energy.
__________________
All moderations in purple.

You ain't nobody 'til you've been banned.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 12-April-2008, 08:50 AM
Teabinge's Avatar
Teabinge Teabinge is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 43
Default

"Sending a robot is almost like sending one of them"

They could be nano-sized or otherwise very difficult to detect (and already here...).

Last edited by Teabinge; 12-April-2008 at 01:36 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 10:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today