If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-April-2008, 09:19 PM
pie33 pie33 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 14
Default Nothing out there.

How could a universe be without advanced civilizations living on their home planets?

What if the drake equation is a trick question, in which we are the only pre-type I civilization in the universe. The drake equation is not false, because we are here on earth, and the answer will always be 1. However, there is no evidence for advanced civilizations elsewhere in the universe.

With the great silence from 35 years of seti, no evidence of dyson spheres on Hubble’s telescope and Fermi's paradoxical question of "where are they," events, and time may be foretelling us something of our absolute loneliness in the universe.

With no evidence of probes in orbit or in our prehistoric past. - It appears that we have not been visited by advanced civilizations because we are freaks of nature, and there is no such thing as advanced civilizations in the universe, because we are it.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-April-2008, 10:27 PM
evan.aavso evan.aavso is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everett
Posts: 28
Send a message via Skype™ to evan.aavso
Default

well who said that intelligent civilizations haven't sent back a signal yet? and it hasn't reach us? to many people are being optimistic about the SETI program.. the chances of making contact are slim, as been studied and debated for over 30 years.. i dont think you can expect anything just after 30 years of searching.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-April-2008, 10:28 PM
Premodial Premodial is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: everett,wa
Posts: 23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by evan.aavso View Post
well who said that intelligent civilizations haven't sent back a signal yet? and it hasn't reach us? to many people are being optimistic about the SETI program.. the chances of making contact are slim, as been studied and debated for over 30 years.. i dont think you can expect anything just after 30 years of searching.
agreed!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-April-2008, 01:14 AM
KaiYeves's Avatar
KaiYeves KaiYeves is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Currently on assignment on planet shown in avatar photo
Posts: 6,824
Default

Yes, we must keep searching.
__________________
Rovers forever! - ToSeek
"The only way to explore the universe is to go and look." - Brian Cox
Well, the best way to find out is to go there and, find out. - Raven's Cry
'Evolution and science are one thing, but you don’t mess with Yoko Ono. Everybody knows that. ' - 386sx
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-April-2008, 05:46 AM
Neverfly's Avatar
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pie33 View Post
How could a universe be without advanced civilizations living on their home planets?

What if the drake equation is a trick question, in which we are the only pre-type I civilization in the universe. The drake equation is not false, because we are here on earth, and the answer will always be 1. However, there is no evidence for advanced civilizations elsewhere in the universe.

With the great silence from 35 years of seti, no evidence of dyson spheres on Hubble’s telescope and Fermi's paradoxical question of "where are they," events, and time may be foretelling us something of our absolute loneliness in the universe.

With no evidence of probes in orbit or in our prehistoric past. - It appears that we have not been visited by advanced civilizations because we are freaks of nature, and there is no such thing as advanced civilizations in the universe, because we are it.
Bear in mind too, we are only able to 'see' the very local.
Even Hubble can only see so far... and the further out it looks, the longer that light has been traveling to us. Like looking bac in time.

Our own E.M. radiation barely makes it out past the outer fringe of the solar system. Even if someone is out there with a SETI of their own- they are not likely to pick up our E.M. any time soon. It would be extremely weak and degraded to the point of non existence before it reached the nearest star.

We can discover extra-solar planets, but only by measuring gravitational effects. Not direct observation. Most of the ones we have found are bigger than Jupiter.

So, realistically, at our current technology, the odds of us seeing anyone or being seen are actually very slim.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-April-2008, 10:19 AM
Kullat Nunu's Avatar
Kullat Nunu Kullat Nunu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,686
Default

Yes, but this doesn't explain the Fermi paradox: if intelligent life is common, why they're not here? Assuming that none of the civilizations haven't decided to colonize the Milky Way over the billions of years when intelligent life has been possible is far-fetched. Interstellar distances and vast timespans are not a problem for a highly resilient or mechanical entities.

Either they don't exist, or we understand the advanced civilizations fundamentally wrong. I suspect the latter. No doubt that our view of how advanced civilizations ought to operate is hopelessly naive.
__________________
Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool.
-- Richard Feynman
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-April-2008, 10:40 AM
geonuc's Avatar
geonuc geonuc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kullat Nunu View Post
Interstellar distances and vast timespans are not a problem for a highly resilient or mechanical entities.
Well, I'd consider humans to be fairly intelligent, as life forms go, and interstellar distances look pretty challenging to me.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-April-2008, 10:42 AM
Neverfly's Avatar
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kullat Nunu View Post
Yes, but this doesn't explain the Fermi paradox: if intelligent life is common, why they're not here?
I could really misinterpret that

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kullat Nunu View Post
Assuming that none of the civilizations haven't decided to colonize the Milky Way over the billions of years when intelligent life has been possible is far-fetched. Interstellar distances and vast timespans are not a problem for a highly resilient or mechanical entities.
Maybe. But there are pretty severe limits to what we can "see" even in our neighborhood. Add to that the vast distances between galaxies and the vast number of galaxies... It's pretty danged unlikely that anyone is close enough for us to talk to.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kullat Nunu View Post
Either they don't exist, or we understand the advanced civilizations fundamentally wrong. I suspect the latter. No doubt that our view of how advanced civilizations ought to operate is hopelessly naive.
Or maybe we just can't see them yet.
Let's be realistic about the sizes and distances and timeline that we are currently able to observe.

Right now, we can't even tell if there is life on Europa- and that's pretty close!

Over distances- we are looking back in time. Add to that, we may not see the machines or markers of an advanced civilization- even if it's only a few hundred light years away.

From Alpha Centuri, would an observer be able to tell if there was any life on Earth at all? Most likely not. We are tiny, our EM radiation barely significant if noticable-
Our machines in space would be as easy to spot as a molecule of oil in the ocean.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-April-2008, 11:46 AM
geonuc's Avatar
geonuc geonuc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
Right now, we can't even tell if there is life on Europa- and that's pretty close!
Good point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
Over distances- we are looking back in time. Add to that, we may not see the machines or markers of an advanced civilization- even if it's only a few hundred light years away.
Another good point.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-April-2008, 02:38 PM
Trantor Trantor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 352
Default

I'm sure that somewhere out there, probably in our own galaxy, there are other intelligent beings who are saying the same thing - "there's nothing out there".
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-April-2008, 06:03 PM
Kaptain K's Avatar
Kaptain K Kaptain K is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elgin, Tx
Posts: 7,367
Default

Quote:
From Alpha Centuri, would an observer be able to tell if there was any life on Earth at all?
To a civilization just a little more advanced than us, from Alpha Centauri, Earth with its 21% O2 atmosphere would stick out like a floodlit sign saying here is life!
__________________
Any day you wake up on "the right side of the dirt" is a good day.

T. Anderson
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-April-2008, 07:19 PM
Amber Robot's Avatar
Amber Robot Amber Robot is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 614
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pie33 View Post
With the great silence from 35 years of seti, no evidence of dyson spheres on Hubble’s telescope and Fermi's paradoxical question of "where are they," events, and time may be foretelling us something of our absolute loneliness in the universe.
The fallacy of the SETI project is that we are searching for signals that we ourselves are unwilling to send out. Should the other civilizations be similarly inclined then no one will ever be heard.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 01:52 AM
BigDon's Avatar
BigDon BigDon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,433
Default

You know, it could be just too soon.

We like to think the Universe has been around a long time, because it has as far as we're concerned. 13 billion years IS forever to humans. But the Universe is easily expected to get to be a trillion years old (1000 billion) and may reach 3 trillion (3 thousand billion!) before the laws of reality change markly from present day observation.

Anybody see what I'm getting at here?

Somebody has to be first. I know science has gone a long way to prove we are not "special" in the Universe.

What, we (the Universe where Spock is clean shaven) are just now getting into our third generation of stellar formation? I'll worry about the lack of other civilizations at around the 500 billion year mark. I bet we will be full then. And they will wonder who was first. And have absolutely no way of knowing it was us.

Just wait for it. I bet I'm right.
__________________
"The beauty of that discussion of averages is that you don't have to be an expert in Apollo or in photography in order to see where this time study "analysis" breaks down. You just have to be, well...not an idiot." -JayUtah
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 03:48 AM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,633
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaptain K View Post
To a civilization just a little more advanced than us, from Alpha Centauri, Earth with its 21% O2 atmosphere would stick out like a floodlit sign saying here is life!
...Assuming that's what their planet's life uses.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
Illuminati's Razor-The most complicatedly evil answer is usually the most correct answer. - Fazor
"Every book is a children's book if the kid can read." - Mitch Hedberg
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 04:05 AM
Kaptain K's Avatar
Kaptain K Kaptain K is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elgin, Tx
Posts: 7,367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noclevername View Post
...Assuming that's what their planet's life uses.
No! I'm assuming that they have brains and know how to use them.

If we find a planet a similar percentage of chlorine or flouring, we will be just as certain that there is life there and for the same reason!
__________________
Any day you wake up on "the right side of the dirt" is a good day.

T. Anderson
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 04:08 AM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,633
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaptain K View Post
No! I'm assuming that they have brains and know how to use them.

If we find a planet a similar percentage of chlorine or flouring, we will be just as certain that there is life there and for the same reason!
Or that some other chemical process is at work. We can't jump to hasty conclusions, it's science, not blogging.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
Illuminati's Razor-The most complicatedly evil answer is usually the most correct answer. - Fazor
"Every book is a children's book if the kid can read." - Mitch Hedberg
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 04:19 AM
Kaptain K's Avatar
Kaptain K Kaptain K is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elgin, Tx
Posts: 7,367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noclevername View Post
Or that some other chemical process is at work. We can't jump to hasty conclusions, it's science, not blogging.
This is basic chemistry. It is (more than) fairly well understood. Do you know what happens if you mix hydrogen and fluorine (in the dark, by the way) and expose it to direct sunlight?
__________________
Any day you wake up on "the right side of the dirt" is a good day.

T. Anderson
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 04:35 AM
FriedPhoton's Avatar
FriedPhoton FriedPhoton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Event Horizon
Posts: 509
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDon View Post
You know, it could be just too soon.

We like to think the Universe has been around a long time, because it has as far as we're concerned. 13 billion years IS forever to humans. But the Universe is easily expected to get to be a trillion years old (1000 billion) and may reach 3 trillion (3 thousand billion!) before the laws of reality change markly from present day observation.

Anybody see what I'm getting at here?

Somebody has to be first. I know science has gone a long way to prove we are not "special" in the Universe.

What, we (the Universe where Spock is clean shaven) are just now getting into our third generation of stellar formation? I'll worry about the lack of other civilizations at around the 500 billion year mark. I bet we will be full then. And they will wonder who was first. And have absolutely no way of knowing it was us.

Just wait for it. I bet I'm right.
I've got a dollar that says you're wrong!
__________________
The only way of finding the limits of the possible is by going beyond them into the impossible.

Arthur C. Clarke


The Brain Science Podcast
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 04:37 AM
FriedPhoton's Avatar
FriedPhoton FriedPhoton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Event Horizon
Posts: 509
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
We can discover extra-solar planets, but only by measuring gravitational effects. Not direct observation. Most of the ones we have found are bigger than Jupiter.
We have direct observations of some now. Look up brown dwarf on wikipedia, you'll be happy to see an image. Cool stuff.
__________________
The only way of finding the limits of the possible is by going beyond them into the impossible.

Arthur C. Clarke


The Brain Science Podcast
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 04:58 AM