Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-September-2003, 09:16 PM
Madcat Madcat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wouldn't you rather know my velocity?
Posts: 593
Default Poking Black Holes with a stick...

Kind of an odd thing to wonder about I guess, but if you had a little black hole sitting in front of you, (and it wasn't sucking you in because that's no fun at all) could you exert any force on it? If you throw something at the hole, or as the title suggests, poke it with a stick, will it absorb Kinetic energy and begin to accelerate towards whatever direction the thing you hit the hole with was travelling? :-?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-September-2003, 10:06 PM
Kebsis's Avatar
Kebsis Kebsis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 991
Send a message via AIM to Kebsis
Default

Well, if it didn't have any gravitational effect on you it really wouldn't be much of a blackhole. I guess, that if you could somehow turn off gravity for a while and get in close to a blackhole, you really wouldn't be able to see it, since a blackhole's singularity is a point particle.
__________________
"Most editorials are written by people that love to argue but got kicked off debate team for not making any sense." -Seanbaby
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-September-2003, 10:40 PM
Russ's Avatar
Russ Russ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Southern Ohio
Posts: 1,583
Default

Your question seems to be "Is it possible to exert a force on a BH?" I would think not but maybe some one else of greater knowledge can speak to that.

To address the other aspect of your question: With a very small black hole, one with mass small enough to create an event horizon a few centemeters in diameter, you could, concievably, be within a few feet and not be sucked in. The point of no return with a BH is the event horizon, where the escape velocity excedes 'C'. as long as you're safely distant from the event horizon you could use a broom stick or fishing pole to try to push the BH. Whatever part of your pole passes the EH will be gone forever. No warrenty, no return.
__________________
It's just one of those damn things of which there are many few. -- Dan Blocker
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-September-2003, 12:48 AM
The Bad Astronomer's Avatar
The Bad Astronomer The Bad Astronomer is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Posts: 7,339
Default

A black hole is a mass just like anything else. If there were some way to exert a force on it, it would move. For example, a black hole will orbit the center of the Galaxy, due to the Milky Way's gravity. A BH in binary system orbits the other star.

Also, you could dump lots of electrons into one. It will gain a negative charge, and you could tow it around with an electromagnet. Really.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-September-2003, 12:52 AM
mike alexander's Avatar
mike alexander mike alexander is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: McMinnville, Oregon
Posts: 7,004
Default

BA writes
Quote:
Also, you could dump lots of electrons into one. It will gain a negative charge, and you could tow it around with an electromagnet. Really
Larry Niven used this trick in his story 'The Borderland of Sol'.
__________________
The Devil offered me power. I told him I preferred aperture.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-September-2003, 01:08 AM
Colt's Avatar
Colt Colt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Empire of Alaska
Posts: 1,424
Send a message via ICQ to Colt Send a message via MSN to Colt
Default

I was just thinking of that Mike. I dreamt upon a Quark BH.. -Colt
__________________
Be not afraid of any man no matter what his size; when danger threatens, call on me, and I will equalize.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-September-2003, 11:42 AM
Pinemarten's Avatar
Pinemarten Pinemarten is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,626
Default

I just became curious as to another question.

Is there a minimum or maximum size for black holes?

Can we make a little one in 'the lab'?

Would a 'granddaddy' take out the universe?

I think I will post this in the "Black Hole FAQ" sticky thread as well.

http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/vi...=139757#139757
__________________
'Sir........, I don't like these numbers.'
'Then hire somebody that can change them!'
("`-/")_.-'"``-.,,
\. . `; -._( );, `)
(v_,)' _ )`-. \ ``'`
_.- _..-/ /((.'
((,.-' ((,/
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-September-2003, 11:48 AM
kucharek's Avatar
kucharek kucharek is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany, Old Europe
Posts: 4,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Astronomer
Also, you could dump lots of electrons into one. It will gain a negative charge, and you could tow it around with an electromagnet. Really.
Towing an electrostatically charged body around with an electromagnet? I don't think the magnet is significant. The chared body will attract any uncharged body, magnetic or not.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-September-2003, 12:23 PM
Pinemarten's Avatar
Pinemarten Pinemarten is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kucharek
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Astronomer
Also, you could dump lots of electrons into one. It will gain a negative charge, and you could tow it around with an electromagnet. Really.
Towing an electrostatically charged body around with an electromagnet? I don't think the magnet is significant. The charged body will attract any uncharged body, magnetic or not.
I beg to differ.

Magnets attract electrons to their south pole and protons to their north (or is it the other way?)
I remember learning it in school during motor dynamics. I no longer have the books to prove it, but I am sure I am not far off the mark.
__________________
'Sir........, I don't like these numbers.'
'Then hire somebody that can change them!'
("`-/")_.-'"``-.,,
\. . `; -._( );, `)
(v_,)' _ )`-. \ ``'`
_.- _..-/ /((.'
((,.-' ((,/
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12-September-2003, 12:28 PM
kucharek's Avatar
kucharek kucharek is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany, Old Europe
Posts: 4,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinemarten
Quote:
Originally Posted by kucharek
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Astronomer
Also, you could dump lots of electrons into one. It will gain a negative charge, and you could tow it around with an electromagnet. Really.
Towing an electrostatically charged body around with an electromagnet? I don't think the magnet is significant. The charged body will attract any uncharged body, magnetic or not.
I beg to differ.

Magnets attract electrons to their south pole and protons to their north (or is it the other way?)
I remember learning it in school during motor dynamics. I no longer have the books to prove it, but I am sure I am not far off the mark.
Are you talking about the Lorentz force on moving electrons in a magnetic field? But in our case, I don't consider the electrons moving.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 12-September-2003, 12:43 PM
Pinemarten's Avatar
Pinemarten Pinemarten is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,626
Default

I guess I should have stated positive and negative charges, as opposed to electrons and protons.

A magnet doesn't care where the charge comes from, but it still either attracts or repels it.

That may be why it is the strongest large force in the universe.
__________________
'Sir........, I don't like these numbers.'
'Then hire somebody that can change them!'
("`-/")_.-'"``-.,,
\. . `; -._( );, `)
(v_,)' _ )`-. \ ``'`
_.- _..-/ /((.'
((,.-' ((,/
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 12-September-2003, 02:53 PM
eburacum45's Avatar
eburacum45 eburacum45 is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: old york
Posts: 4,745
Default

Apologies to the real astronomers among you, but perhaps I could just answer Pinemartin:
(by all means correct me where I am wrong)
Is there a minimum or maximum size for black holes?
Can we make a little one in 'the lab'?
Would a 'granddaddy' take out the universe?


A tiny black hole would evaporate in a fraction of a second; any mass it contained would be liberated in the form of energy.
The smallest size possible would be a black hole 1 planck length in diameter (all diameters are across the event horizon; the singularity is assumed to be a dimensionless point).

if you have a slightly larger one it will still be evaporating, but it will be much smaller than an atom, and the energy coming out would push infalling matter away, so nothing could get in anyway.
A 1000 tonne black hole would last ~200 seconds, give off 1000 tonnes worth of pure energy, be smaller than a proton and look like a billion H-bombs going off.
As Black holes get bigger, the evaporation gets slower, untill you have one the mass of a medium sized asteroid, which is sucking stuff in as fast as it is irradiating energy.
This is about the size of a golf ball.

None of the above black holes have ever been seen, but it is possible the smallest ones may be manufactured one day, but these smallest ones will last just a tiny fraction of a second.

Bigger than that, they are stable, and actually start to increase in size as they suck more mass and energy in from ordinary space;

most of the black holes we know about are
EITHER formed from collapsing stars, and are about 3x as massive as the Sun (or more),
but only ten miles or so across the event horizon;
there are several objects in the sky which can best be explained as being black holes of this size;

OR formed in the early universe; each one weighs millions or billions of times the mass of the sun, and is perhaps fifteen million kilometers across- the diameter of a large star.

You could fly into a galactic black hole and hardly notice you had crossed the event horizon; but you would never get out again.

The maximum size for a black hole would have to be one which contains all the matter in the universe; thanks to the acceleration of the expansion of our universe I would have to say no, it could never happen.
But who knows?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today