Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 16-October-2003, 03:24 AM
Tuckerfan's Avatar
Tuckerfan Tuckerfan is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gallatin, TN
Posts: 2,015
Send a message via AIM to Tuckerfan Send a message via MSN to Tuckerfan
Default How Much an Orion-Type Spaceship Cost to Build?

Obviously it's not going to be cheap to build such a thing, but has anyone ever worked up a cost estimate of what one would cost to build?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 16-October-2003, 03:49 AM
Kaptain K's Avatar
Kaptain K Kaptain K is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elgin, Tx
Posts: 7,674
Default

[Carl Sagan voice] Beelyuns and Beelyuns! [/Carl Sagan voice]

ops: Sorry, I just couldn't resist a straight line like that. ops:
__________________
Any day you wake up on "the right side of the dirt" is a good day.

T. Anderson
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 16-October-2003, 03:54 AM
russ_watters russ_watters is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,247
Send a message via Yahoo to russ_watters
Default

You mean AFTER its invented, right?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 16-October-2003, 05:00 AM
Tuckerfan's Avatar
Tuckerfan Tuckerfan is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gallatin, TN
Posts: 2,015
Send a message via AIM to Tuckerfan Send a message via MSN to Tuckerfan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by russ_watters
You mean AFTER its invented, right?
Well test models have been built, and surely Dyson and the others calculated what it would cost to build a full-size version.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 16-October-2003, 12:39 PM
Reacher's Avatar
Reacher Reacher is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 391
Send a message via MSN to Reacher
Default

From what I can gather, the 'Orion' was propelled by explosives, in some book or movie.
Which book or movie?
__________________
Begone, braggage!
My bible!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 16-October-2003, 02:55 PM
eburacum45's Avatar
eburacum45 eburacum45 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: old york
Posts: 5,734
Default

I would suggest we go for a fusion -pulse type drive, which would be smoother; rather than dump h-bombs out the back and expect the shock absorbers to smooth the ride out, we should be looking at fusing tiny pellets of deuterium/He3 by laser almost continually, the pulses would be so short you could hardly feel them.
The pulsed fusion rocket is at the bottom of this page;
http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_rocket
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 16-October-2003, 03:18 PM
Grey's Avatar
Grey Grey is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,344
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reacher
From what I can gather, the 'Orion' was propelled by explosives, in some book or movie.
Which book or movie?
Orion may have been featured in fiction somewhere, but it was actually proposed in the 1950's as a serious spacecraft design. It would have been propelled by the explosion of nuclear devices, and could theoretically travel to the stars, although not at a very fast rate (but better than conventional fuels would do by far). It sounds like enough work was done to demonstrate that it actually would have been possible to build, but a treaty banning nuclear explosions in space prevented further work.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 16-October-2003, 03:39 PM
Betenoire Betenoire is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Posts: 835
Send a message via AIM to Betenoire
Default

The movie was Deep Impact.

It's actually really simple and cheap. I mean, once you find anything that can stand up to a nuclear blast.
__________________
Contrary to the opinion of the press, the public, and their mothers, most scientists are dull and uninteresting people.
- James Watson
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 16-October-2003, 04:05 PM
WHarris WHarris is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 565
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reacher
From what I can gather, the 'Orion' was propelled by explosives, in some book or movie.
Which book or movie?
Two books that I know of that have Orion type spacecraft are "Footfall" by Niven and Pournelle, and "Orion Shall Rise" (I can't remember the author).
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 16-October-2003, 04:07 PM
Betenoire Betenoire is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Posts: 835
Send a message via AIM to Betenoire
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eburacum45
I would suggest we go for a fusion -pulse type drive, which would be smoother; rather than dump h-bombs out the back and expect the shock absorbers to smooth the ride out, we should be looking at fusing tiny pellets of deuterium/He3 by laser almost continually, the pulses would be so short you could hardly feel them.
The pulsed fusion rocket is at the bottom of this page;
http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_rocket
The technology on that is just a bit far off, don't ya think?
__________________
Contrary to the opinion of the press, the public, and their mothers, most scientists are dull and uninteresting people.
- James Watson
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 16-October-2003, 06:21 PM
daver daver is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,860
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WHarris
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reacher
From what I can gather, the 'Orion' was propelled by explosives, in some book or movie.
Which book or movie?
Two books that I know of that have Orion type spacecraft are "Footfall" by Niven and Pournelle, and "Orion Shall Rise" (I can't remember the author).
Poul Anderson. Interesting example of synchronicity--two novels dealing with Project Orion coming out at just about the same time.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 16-October-2003, 06:43 PM
mike alexander's Avatar
mike alexander mike alexander is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: McMinnville, Oregon
Posts: 10,053
Default

In his book The Curve of Binding Energy John McPhee talked with Theodore Taylor about the original Orion concept (which was indeed aborted by, among other things, the test ban teaty). It was tested using conventional explosives and seemed to work quite well. There's an interesting little story in there about how they brought the idea to von Braun.

By the way, is that a GREAT title for a book, or what?
__________________
If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about the answers.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 17-October-2003, 04:52 AM
Tuckerfan's Avatar
Tuckerfan Tuckerfan is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gallatin, TN
Posts: 2,015
Send a message via AIM to Tuckerfan Send a message via MSN to Tuckerfan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Betenoire
Quote:
Originally Posted by eburacum45
I would suggest we go for a fusion -pulse type drive, which would be smoother; rather than dump h-bombs out the back and expect the shock absorbers to smooth the ride out, we should be looking at fusing tiny pellets of deuterium/He3 by laser almost continually, the pulses would be so short you could hardly feel them.
The pulsed fusion rocket is at the bottom of this page;
http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_rocket
The technology on that is just a bit far off, don't ya think?
Agreed. I'm interested in the Orion because we could build one today if we were so inclined. (We've got plenty of fuel available.)
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 17-October-2003, 04:54 AM
The Supreme Canuck's Avatar
The Supreme Canuck The Supreme Canuck is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 6,877
Default

You just have to convince people that nuk-yu-lar is not a dirty word.
__________________
Quaeso quousque humi defixa tua mens erit? Nonne aspicis, quae in templa veneris?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 17-October-2003, 07:33 AM
sol_g2v's Avatar
sol_g2v sol_g2v is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Orion Arm
Posts: 145
Default

Project Orion, written by Freeman Dyson's son, is a great book that describes the effort to build the real Orion starship. Politics killed it, not technology.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 17-October-2003, 11:28 PM
Tuckerfan's Avatar
Tuckerfan Tuckerfan is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gallatin, TN
Posts: 2,015
Send a message via AIM to Tuckerfan Send a message via MSN to Tuckerfan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sol_g2v
Project Orion, written by Freeman Dyson's son, is a great book that describes the effort to build the real Orion starship. Politics killed it, not technology.
Say, sol, he wouldn't have mentioned an estimated price tag for one of the ships in the book, would he?
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 18-October-2003, 01:29 AM
Madcat Madcat is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wouldn't you rather know my velocity?
Posts: 593
Default

Quote:
The technology on that is just a bit far off, don't ya think?
Yeah, you know I always have to wonder where the energy to fire the laser is supposed to come from... I like the concept but it's hard to picture right now.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 18-October-2003, 04:00 AM
roidspop roidspop is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 292
Default

This is a good account of Orion, pro and con. Seems it might have been a little more difficult to pull off than the early proponents claimed.

http://www.alternatehistory.com/gate...ml#Performance[/url]
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 19-October-2003, 11:48 PM
russ_watters russ_watters is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,247
Send a message via Yahoo to russ_watters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuckerfan
Quote:
Originally Posted by russ_watters
You mean AFTER its invented, right?
Well test models have been built, and surely Dyson and the others calculated what it would cost to build a full-size version.
There is a big difference between that and a working prototype.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 21-October-2003, 05:21 PM
eburacum45's Avatar
eburacum45 eburacum45 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: old york
Posts: 5,734
Default

A nice image of Larry Niven's version here.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2003, 12:46 AM
Colt's Avatar
Colt Colt is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Empire of Alaska
Posts: 1,424
Send a message via ICQ to Colt Send a message via MSN to Colt
Default

THis is a good site about nuclear technology in space: http://www.nuclearspace.com/
__________________
Be not afraid of any man no matter what his size; when danger threatens, call on me, and I will equalize.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 13-August-2007, 01:14 AM
Zachary Zachary is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: London
Posts: 400
Send a message via MSN to Zachary
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuckerfan View Post
Say, sol, he wouldn't have mentioned an estimated price tag for one of the ships in the book, would he?
I'd hazard a guess that it would cost about as much as the Apollo project did in the 60s. There are similar analogues; when apollo was started we had the required theoretical knowledge but lacked engineering know-how, and both projects would be on a similar scale. Building an orion drive would be a massive undertaking.


Also what stuff do we have that can survive a nuclear blast? I'm thinking not a lot.
__________________
"Bessie Braddock to Churchill "Winston, your drunk!"
Churchill: "Bessie, you're ugly, and tomorrow morning I shall be sober""

the solar system
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 13-August-2007, 02:29 AM
novaderrik's Avatar
novaderrik novaderrik is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Henning, MN, USA
Posts: 3,532
Default

just need to find an unobtanium deposit somewhere, and we can get this thing built.
__________________
"blacker than the blackest black... times infinity."- Nathan Explosion
The.. Best.. Thread..Ever...
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 13-August-2007, 03:20 AM
Drbuzz0's Avatar
Drbuzz0 Drbuzz0 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 333
Send a message via ICQ to Drbuzz0 Send a message via AIM to Drbuzz0 Send a message via MSN to Drbuzz0 Send a message via Yahoo to Drbuzz0 Send a message via Skype™ to Drbuzz0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zachary View Post
Also what stuff do we have that can survive a nuclear blast? I'm thinking not a lot.
What yield? Standoff, air burst, direct hit or digger? And do ya mean just one or a whole barrage of them?

Listen buddy, Hell I can set you up with something which will take on ten Tsar Bombs in a row... It's gona cost ya though.


(And by cost ya, I mean how many miles deep into ancient granite formations are you looking to go?)


;-)
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 13-August-2007, 03:21 AM
Drbuzz0's Avatar
Drbuzz0 Drbuzz0 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 333
Send a message via ICQ to Drbuzz0 Send a message via AIM to Drbuzz0 Send a message via MSN to Drbuzz0 Send a message via Yahoo to Drbuzz0 Send a message via Skype™ to Drbuzz0
Default

I believe the project, as it now is on paper involves designing a rocket to go to the moon to harvest the massive titanium deposits on the moon and then take the back to earth to build the Orion spacecraft out of, so that it can be used to go to the moon....

Yeah... that's how stuff tends to work at Nasa
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 13-August-2007, 08:55 PM
m1omg's Avatar
m1omg m1omg is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,479
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by novaderrik View Post
just need to find an unobtanium deposit somewhere, and we can get this thing built.
No.Just a carefuly build pusher plate made of some good metal.
The explosion will be pushing the plate and propel the ship.
Simple and effective, that is Orion, but also unecconomical and very heavy.
Use more brain than pessimism pls folks.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 13-August-2007, 09:35 PM
selden's Avatar
selden selden is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 155
Default

Crude cost estimates are in the declassified documents available for downloading from NASA's Technical Reports Server at http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp

Section 6 of "Nuclear Pulse Space Vehicle Study, Vol. 1 -- Summary" (1964) projected a development cost of about $2 Billion for the 10-meter version of the spacecraft.
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/ca...1965058729.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 15-August-2007, 09:35 AM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zachary View Post
Also what stuff do we have that can survive a nuclear blast? I'm thinking not a lot.
It already exusts, it's called distance. The nuclear blasts would take place at a carefully calculated distance from the pusher plate, so that the released energy would ablate the plate surface, adding to the overall thrust in most designs.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
"The Mayan symbol for "book" looks a lot like a triple hamburger, but I've never seen them claiming it as proof the Mayans had Big Macs." - KaiYeves
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 15-August-2007, 06:44 PM
Jerry's Avatar
Jerry Jerry is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 4,113
Default

In the early, sixties, the U.S. actually started building an engine for a nuclear airplane - the idea was it could fly around with a bunch of warheads, ready to nuke any advisary at a moment's notice. I think the effort ended before the test ban; more a victim of sanity and the perfection of in-air refueling.

The prototype engine is on display near the Atomic Energy Museum in Arco, Idaho. So is the first breeder reactor, and the first reactor used to generate electricity.
__________________
jwj

It's a big universe out there...is it really unwinding, really burning out?
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 16-August-2007, 04:08 AM
BigDon's Avatar
BigDon BigDon is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 5,845
Default

Jerry, it also left a radioactive contrail which left it vulnerable to seeking weapons, among other drawbacks.

I recall the plate only needs to be three feet thick of iron.
__________________
In your rush to call everyone "entrenched" or closed-minded or "limited" you fail to note that the "limit" here has a very natural boundary: that point at which the evidence stops. - JayUtah

Science fiction was never meant to be an educational tool. - Editor Amazing Tales
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today