I have no idea what this means, but I presume some of you would be interested.

Mysterious Source of High-Energy Cosmic radiation Discovered

Cosmic Rays From A Mysterious, Nearby Object

The titles are slightly misleading. By 'nearby' they mean ~3,000 light years, and the location of the source has not been pin-pointed. Extract from the first article:

And BA Blog: Something powerful lurks nearby:

__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...

That BA blog article explains it much better.

So- a point source would imply an object we know about already, whereas 'coming from everywhere' might imply dark matter- right? That's very cool.

Whoooh Nellie!

The apparent excess is at an energy level, not a place? And the reason it has to be galactic is because we have a theory that says they can't get here from there?

That was the running hypothesis for decades, before it was more-or-less proven 'broad spectrum' CR's were not aligned with the galactic plain and therefore truly cosmic.

Now we have imaginary particles colliding in ways that release energy in ways that we cannot duplicate. These imaginary particles also require properties we cannot, or have not been able to study in the laboratory. This is not a "Mysterious Source of High-Energy Cosmic Radiation Discovered" but another rather untestable hypothesis.

The evidence is cool, the imagination of Dark Matter theories resourceful; but the science backing this claim is at best, weak. I have a LOT of trouble with extensions of theories that fail to meet expectations in many ways (such as the many futile searches for gravitational waves) parking power rays right at our own doorstep: When astronauts leave the protective confines of our own atmosphere, their brains are riddled with cosmic zapping. If this is Dark Matter colliding with Dark Matter, shouldn't we detect occasional extremely high energy events in our massive, sensitive neutrino detectors? Did I just lose another brain cell?

__________________
jwj

It's a big universe out there...is it really unwinding, really burning out?

Preoccupied with a paradigm

Some theorists are finding the recent results exciting with respect to the possibility of Dark Matter Particles of a particular energy self destructing.

This involves accepting some a priori assumptions that form the basis of the paradigm. The outlook is from the vantage point that the particles are sourced at a particular place and lose energy as they arrive to our detectors.

A couple recent arxiv submissions on the topic within the popular paradigm:

Decaying Hidden Gauge Boson and the PAMELA and ATIC/PPB-BETS Anomalies
Abstract: http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.3357

Distinguishing Between Dark Matter and Pulsar Origins of the ATIC Electron Spectrum With Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes

Abstract: http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.3362

As and example of an alternative paradigm to arrive at the particular spike of energy range could be that the electrons are sourced from a variety of indefinite places, from nearby and far away pulsars for example and accepting that the distant electrons would still lose energy according to current theories, But then find a galactic accelerator that kicks them back up to the observed energy distribution. Different galaxies will have different peaks. Whether the acceleration is electromagnetic or gravitational, possibly due to the strength of the Dark Matter Effect within a galaxy, could be sorted out by comparing the masses of the effects between electrons, positrons, and protons. If it is blind to charge to mass ratios, this may implicate gravitational or gravity-like forces.

I can't wait until somebody asks if the source might not be Planet X.

__________________
As above, so below

No worries. You've done nothing wrong. Mr Weor has.
Seriously, if you want to persuade us he's correct- take it to ATM- we'll only be willing to listen. But be prepared to get shouted at.

Ok, interesting theories here. But how about we give them a chance to locate the source, before we change all our current models?

__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

I think the new pulsar wind model with dome and equatorial emission looks like a good candidate for the high velocity electrons. Nice job here by F. Curtis Michel :http://www.capca.ucalgary.ca/meeting...lks/michel.pdf




pete....might be from a nearby pulsar, such as Geminga, or...see:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...f2bee2a66c259f



see: J0108-1431 in Wiki's pulsar section...~ 200 light-years...See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulsar

__________________
A third rate theory forbids.
A second rate theory explains after the fact.
A first rate theory predicts.
A. Lomonosov

I'm finding that there could be hundreds and thousands of pulsars in our Galaxy. Is this true? All 'dim' pulsars though. Hmm.

nah.. that's just silly.
it was probably just an alien ship going into hyperspace or something mundane like that.

__________________
"blacker than the blackest black... times infinity."- Nathan Explosion
The.. Best.. Thread..Ever...

That sounds about right. From McLaughlin et al 2005:-
"This discovery" refers to Rotating Radio Transients (RRATs) which appear to be old pulsars with long periods (>>4s) and have been linked to DINS.

Not all neutron stars are pulsars.

I'll have a look at that, thanks loglo.
But most are, no? Anyway...one step at a time please! This is all a bit above my head...

i am confused did this just this start out of the blue or has it been happening for while and we just detected it for the first time?

All we have now is an excess in a bandwidth that current theory says is too high to have traveled cosmic distances (If the rays were from outside our galaxy, they should have collided with the Cosmic Microwave Background.)

It is difficult to pin down sources, because the path of Cosmic Rays can be bent and twisted by electromagnetic fields.

__________________
jwj

It's a big universe out there...is it really unwinding, really burning out?

I always end up scaring you, so I'll leave this for others.

How could we know? We just started detecting it, but can we say for sure it was happening before that?

But, most likely, odds-wise, it was happening for a long time. Now is not special except that you and I exist and that the tool was invented to detect this. It kinda makes sense that it was going on without our knowledge the day before, the week before, and 1000 years before. 10 billion years ago, I'm less confident about.

See Louisiana State University: Advanced Thin Ionization Calorimeter (ATIC) makes National News.

I don't undersand your confusion. What is to be confused about? Are there some contradictory facts you see?

__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...

ok thanks. this whole thing is interesting, all i know about cosmic rays is that they contain protons and that they pound our planet daily. as for the object it could be a number of things, some sort of dark matter object, something mundane thats obscured by some thing else, or a cloked klingon bird of prey testing our defenses.

That's what I'm rooting for.

Is there any possibility this object could be a Brown Dwarf?

__________________
"Where the telescope ends, the microscope begins. Which of the two has the greater view?" - Hugo

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened." - Churchill

OH NO ITS PLANET X

What's this? Humour about Planet X? I do believe BAUT therapy may be working for you SDK.

Is this not a valid question?

If Radioactive Brown Dwarfs Are A New Class Of Pulsar where "It looks like brown dwarfs are the missing step between the radio emissions we see generated at Jupiter and those we observe from pulsars" why couldn't this be explained by such a body lurking nearby?

__________________
"Where the telescope ends, the microscope begins. Which of the two has the greater view?" - Hugo

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened." - Churchill

Possibly a rogue stellar black hole is wandering within 3,000 light years.

It still needs to be confirmed that there is a specific direction or two that the rays are sourced. Also it needs to be checked if there is peculiar or proper motion associated with the source(s). Also, if a rogue black hole, whether the particles derive from a jet, as in a microquasar, or whether nearby cosmic rays that pass by its gravity well that already have hyperbolic velocity get a Delta V assist from a flyby anomaly to stand out from background levels.

Once a potential location is plotted, then astronomers can try to confirm a nearby rogue black hole by looking for independent clues such as microlensing and Shapiro time delays if it is close enough to show proper motion.

While I do not find this scenario very probable, I can't rule it out either.

How do you get from radio emissions to very high energy electrons?

__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser

I thought some radio emissions are caused by high energy electrons?

__________________
"Where the telescope ends, the microscope begins. Which of the two has the greater view?" - Hugo

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened." - Churchill

Not an answer to my question.

__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser

Then please reword it; as it is I don't understand the question.

__________________
"Where the telescope ends, the microscope begins. Which of the two has the greater view?" - Hugo

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened." - Churchill

The ATIC finding was an excess of extremely high energy electrons. You mentioned an article about brown dwarfs that does not discuss generation of such electrons. Rather, it discusses radio emissions much like those of, for instance, Jupiter. So, again: How do you get from radio emissions to very high energy electrons? What's the mechanism, for a brown dwarf, and where are your references for that mechanism?

__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser