|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hello,
Does anyone know how to cite stellar objects in a scientific paper? I am trying to figure out how to cite/reference a main-belt asteroid in the JPL small-body database (http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi). Information on this and ways to cite other bodies in general (stars, etc.) would be appreciated! P.S. This is my first post on this forum, please excuse me if this is not the appropriate place to post this. |
|
|||
|
What do you mean by "cite?" As in your reference list of where you got the information, or as in how you refer to the object in a paper. For the former, it varies by journal and is a pain in the butt reformatting everything for each submission. If the catalog has a published paper to go with it, then you cite the paper which is always nice. If the catalog is just a catalog, or a data set that you may find online, then I usually will just reference it in the Acknowledgments that the data are freely available from such-and-such website.
For the latter, minor planets (asteroids, Kuiper Belt Objects) are referred to with their number and then name. For example, 1 Ceres, though some people reference it as (1) Ceres. Or (136199) Eris. Stars, galaxies, and other objects are just given a catalog name/number. For example, HD 246357 (a star from the Henry Draper catalog). For very common objects, some journals will specify what to use, but pretty much everyone knows what the Andromeda Galaxy is, and you can always say the first time you use it, "the Andromeda Galaxy (M31)" and then just use M31 throughout for brevity. And welcome to the boards.
__________________
Useful Astronomy Information Site (yes, it's mine) My Astrophotography/Photography site My "Exposing PseudoAstronomy" Blog "Why do something now when you can put it off 'til later?" -- me :) |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
A third rate theory forbids. A second rate theory explains after the fact. A first rate theory predicts. A. Lomonosov Last edited by trinitree88; 19-March-2009 at 08:02 PM.. Reason: typos |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Reflections on a year and a half’s experience with BAUT’s ATM section | Nereid | Forum Introductions and Feedback | 50 | 19-April-2007 10:09 AM |
| Apollo 16 Astronomy - info req | Gastown | Conspiracy Theories | 4 | 30-March-2004 11:21 PM |
| Chances for a career in astronomy? | reptile | Astronomy | 12 | 13-January-2004 11:24 PM |
| Bad Astronomy cause for breakdown | Stella Jones | Conspiracy Theories | 1 | 31-July-2002 07:34 PM |