|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| View Poll Results: Which of the following would you most like to experience in your lifetime? | |||
| A supernova of naked eye visibility |
|
14 | 21.21% |
| A fully operational base on the Moon |
|
6 | 9.09% |
| A manned mission to Mars |
|
10 | 15.15% |
| An asteroid/comet impact with another planet |
|
1 | 1.52% |
| Discovery of microbial life on another planet |
|
35 | 53.03% |
| Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
By far, the discovery of life. The supernova and asteroid impact would be great events, but of importance mostly to astronomers and enthusiasts. The Moon and Mars travel will be of interest of many in the entire world. But the existence of life beyond Earth will change people's way of thinking about our own existence, virtually world-wide.
|
|
||||
|
I was alive and watched the moon landing, and I followed the Shoemaker-Levy 9 comet impact of Jupiter. So those two are checked off of my bucket list.
I'm rather torn between the Mars landing and the moon outpost, which I still feel should have been done shortly after our landing rather than spending the last 30 some-odd years stuch in low Earth orbit. I do wish I had seen SN1987A though.
__________________
I don't ask stupid questions. I just make stupid statements!!! DETAILS: Where the Devil waits to ensnare the unprepared! Remember. Just because I'm sure doesn't mean I'm right. Experience is a wonderful thing. It enables you to recognise a mistake when you make it again. Last edited by AstroRockHunter; 21-June-2009 at 06:01 PM.. Reason: To mention SN 1987A |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
----- Todd (Bowie, MD, US, North America, Earth, Sol System, Vega region, Local Bubble, Orion arm, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Virgo A Cluster, Virgo supercluster, the universe in which spock is clean shaven) Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. personal page: http://blog.astrosketches.info |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I still think that we could have learned more about the origins of our planet if we had continued to explore the moon, and the most efficient way to do that would have been with a station on the moon.
__________________
I don't ask stupid questions. I just make stupid statements!!! DETAILS: Where the Devil waits to ensnare the unprepared! Remember. Just because I'm sure doesn't mean I'm right. Experience is a wonderful thing. It enables you to recognise a mistake when you make it again. |
|
||||
|
Microbial life, followed by Mars mission and fully operational moon base.
__________________
I want to go back to the moon. I don't care which rocket you use, whichever one you pick, I'll like it, I swear. "If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis Rovers forever! - ToSeek |
|
||||
|
I didn't choose "fully operational moonbase" only because it is likely a prerequisite to putting a man on Mars.
__________________
----- Todd (Bowie, MD, US, North America, Earth, Sol System, Vega region, Local Bubble, Orion arm, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Virgo A Cluster, Virgo supercluster, the universe in which spock is clean shaven) Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. personal page: http://blog.astrosketches.info |
|
||||
|
So, regarding microbial life. What are the odds of finding living microbes or bacteria on or in Mars? If not living, then does anyone think we'll find FOSSILIZED evidence of life on Mars?
Which do you think would be more likely, microbial life on Mars or one of the moons of Saturn and Jupiter?
__________________
"Sir I have a plan. Mein Führer, I can walk!" |
|
||||
|
We have already seen a comet impact on another planet. I voted for "microbial life".
__________________
What brings us together is stronger than what pulls us apart Last edited by Argos; 22-June-2009 at 02:45 PM.. Reason: typo |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]()
__________________
"Science is physics and astronomy." -Me "There is absolutely no law in physics that prevents time travel." -Dr. Michio Kaku |
|
||||
|
Another one I am looking forward to is seeing Venus crossing the Sun. I really hope I don't get clouded out as it will be my only chance to see it.
That would rank lower than the ones in the survey, but is something I am looking forward to.
__________________
"I'm as accurate as any psychic. And I'm a cartoon!" -- Squidward "Arrrgh, the laws of physics be a harsh mistress!" -- Bender |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
|
||||
|
I voted for the supernova, but it is a hard choice. As for transits, I've seen a Mercury transit, and it was one of the more memorable experiences I've had. I'd love to see a Venus transit.
__________________
WANTED: Schroedinger's Cat Dead And Alive |
|
||||
|
I voted the Mars mission. It's right up there next to sustained fusion for me.
I'd love to see a naked-eye supernova, yes, but "naked eye" can be fourth magnitude... I want a repeat of SN 185 or SN 1006!!! ![]() Moonbase - sure, great, but, as others stated, probably a prerequisite for the Mars mission. Impact: I was 17 when Shoemaker-Levy hit Jupiter, and I was already extremely interested in Astronomy. I kept all the newspaper articles. So been there, done that. Though a 1 km impactor into the Moon's near side when it is in shadow would be incredible. Microbial life: Similar to the naked-eye SN. It's not so much microbial life that would be an utter blast... But microbial life not based on DNA (I am talking carbon-based life here, just something different from DNA as a genetic encoder)! If it's based on DNA, a lot of panspermia papers will be written, but it wouldn't really be alien. Concerning bonus question: I say the moonbase happens first. SN and impact are stochastic events, and I think Mars mission needs moonbase, and microbial life possibly needs Mars mission. Unless they really send a dedicated probe into the Enceladus plumes (and all the big ifs are answered with yes, of course). Concerning what might be added to poll: Yeah, something like the 1966 Leonids would also be awesome. Maybe the most impressive visually. I can add further: - Roughly Earth-mass planet in habitable zone with biosphere markers (ozone, methane). - 1859-like solar superflare (not desired, but all too likely...) - "classical" (not low-luminosity) Gamma-Ray Burst in local universe (like possibly 830801B) - Comet like McNaught or the Great Comet of 1910 in the northern hemisphere!! Hale-Bopp was lovely, but you can do better, Solar System, I know it. Finally: I saw the Venus transit, we had perfect weather in central Germany, even had had subarcsecond (!!!) seeing the night before. Ingress was rock-solid. Haven't actually seen a Mercury transit, last one was clouded out (where I was, most of Germany was clear...).
__________________
David Alexander Kann PhD student Thueringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg Ignite our minds and let's burn brighter These are the wonders at your feet - Dark Tranquillity, The Wonders At Your Feet |
|
||||
|
Quote:
We had not enough understanding about the radiation exposure one experiences in space or how to cope with it. Solar power technology was in its laboratory infancy, life support was extremely crude and inefficient. A brute force long term mission could have been done, but the human cost would have been unacceptably high.
__________________
The last time I felt a warm fuzzy feeling, I was informed by my doctor that it was just gas. |
|
||||
|
Not on your list, but we have the technology for sending a probe to the nearest star today, and get signals back in our lifetime (I'm thinking of a dual spacecraft--the main probe accelerates to near the speed of light and does a flyby at that speed, taking whatever photos, radar images, etc. that it can. A smaller one detaches halfway there and uses a solar sail to decelerate and gets there several years later than the big one, and sticks around for in-depth studies, perhaps even following instructions sent to it after we see the result of the big probe). There are a few things in the way: money, treaties against nuclear weapons in space, etc. But wouldn't it be such a boost to the space program and interest in science in general if 10 years from now we were seeing pictures of planets around Alpha Centauri A and B. (Of course, if one turned out to look like an Earth twin....follow up missions to see if there's higher life there would be immanent.)
__________________
----- Todd (Bowie, MD, US, North America, Earth, Sol System, Vega region, Local Bubble, Orion arm, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Virgo A Cluster, Virgo supercluster, the universe in which spock is clean shaven) Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. personal page: http://blog.astrosketches.info |
|
||||
|
I know the poll is asking for what we'd personally like to see, but I'd like to see the one that sparks a direct public movement for much more space involvement. Since the general public's attention is so fleeting, I'm not sure any of the listed would do it. Look how big a concern NEOs were publicly after Shoemaker-Levy, and look how it's been all but forgotten. The first shuttle launch was a huge thing, they later became second page news. Apollo 12 (the whole we've been to the moon already by the media).
While my initial vote would probably be for life elsewhere, because it really would be a huge discovery overshadowing the others, I don't know if that would even make the news these days, because it's too "sciency" for the media. A morbid thought...but maybe Clarke's foreword for Rendezvous with Rama (or the end of 2010) would work. A wake up call. |
|
|||
|
Since there was no "Invited to join United Federation of Planets" option, I picked microbial life. Living to see an interstellar probe arrive would be even better since I'm 57 now.
__________________
Life is like a box of chocolates. All of your choices are bad for you. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
I want to go back to the moon. I don't care which rocket you use, whichever one you pick, I'll like it, I swear. "If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis Rovers forever! - ToSeek |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Science is physics and astronomy." -Me "There is absolutely no law in physics that prevents time travel." -Dr. Michio Kaku |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is the event horizon of a black hole a perfect sphere? | TobiasTheViking | Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers | 11 | 26-October-2008 07:24 PM |
| Light Inside a Black Hole | Yagdrasil | Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers | 195 | 25-December-2007 03:28 AM |
| Signals overtaking people falling into black holes. | Relmuis | Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers | 41 | 15-December-2005 03:15 PM |
| An event horizon with no BH--Yet | Ring | Astronomy | 9 | 19-July-2002 06:29 PM |