Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2004, 12:09 AM
Wdnesday Wdnesday is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California
Posts: 5
Default The Full Moon and bending of light.

My boyfriend and I are having a small disagreement about the true nature of the full moon, and I was hoping some one could clear it up for me.

We both agree about one full side of the moon being lit and where the moon is in relation to the earth is what creates the illusion of a half moon, etc. But he seems to think that when the earth is between the sun and the moon, it disappears because light does not bend. I have been told that light DOES bend, thus creating an illusion of a full moon to us. I recommended that he take a ball and put a flashlight up against it and pull the flashlight away. If light travels only straight, then no light should be in the shadow of the ball, but that's not the case. Some light will start to permeate the shadow, indicating that light bends. He also thinks that the moon is too close to the earth for light to bend around it.

Would some one mind explaining this in a way that we, the people who are interested in astronomy but don't know that much about it, can easily understand. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2004, 12:13 AM
aurora's Avatar
aurora aurora is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,064
Default

The moon only rarely gets directly in line so that the Earth is between it and the sun. When this happens, we call it a lunar eclipse.

The moon's orbit is inclined to the ecliptic, such that most months, when the moon is full, it does not go through Earth's shadow. The moon passes either above or below the Earth's shadow. So it appears all nice and full, and washes out the stars for amateur astronomers on the night side of Earth. :-?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2004, 12:42 AM
Wdnesday Wdnesday is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California
Posts: 5
Default

Yeah, that part isn't so cool.

But now I'm insisting that light does bend to a degree without help from atmosphere or anything else. Diffusion. Am I wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2004, 12:49 AM
AGN Fuel's Avatar
AGN Fuel AGN Fuel is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The beautiful Central Coast, NSW
Posts: 2,437
Default Re: The Full Moon and bending of light.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wdnesday
My boyfriend and I are having a small disagreement about the true nature of the full moon, and I was hoping some one could clear it up for me.

We both agree about one full side of the moon being lit and where the moon is in relation to the earth is what creates the illusion of a half moon, etc. But he seems to think that when the earth is between the sun and the moon, it disappears because light does not bend. I have been told that light DOES bend, thus creating an illusion of a full moon to us. I recommended that he take a ball and put a flashlight up against it and pull the flashlight away. If light travels only straight, then no light should be in the shadow of the ball, but that's not the case. Some light will start to permeate the shadow, indicating that light bends. He also thinks that the moon is too close to the earth for light to bend around it.

Would some one mind explaining this in a way that we, the people who are interested in astronomy but don't know that much about it, can easily understand. Thanks!
Aurora has beaten me to this one - the moons orbit around the Earth is slightly inclined. As a result, the moon is rarely directly in the Earth's shadow.

But you are partially correct - light does bend. Diffraction & refraction are the two most common examples of this phenomenon. Next time you are lucky enough to have a total lunar eclipse in your neighbourhood, you may see the eclipsed moon turn a coppery-red - this is due to sunlight being 'bent' by the Earth's atmosphere and focussed onto the moon, even though the moon is hidden from any direct sunlight by the Earth. Very, very cool. 8)

(edited for clarity)
__________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day." - Douglas Adams

"Certainly, in the topsy-turvy world of heavy rock, having a good solid piece of wood in your hand is often useful." - Ian Faith
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2004, 01:01 AM
AGN Fuel's Avatar
AGN Fuel AGN Fuel is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The beautiful Central Coast, NSW
Posts: 2,437
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wdnesday
But now I'm insisting that light does bend to a degree without help from atmosphere or anything else. Diffusion. Am I wrong?
You're thinking of diffraction. The wave-like properties of light cause it to 'bend' slightly around edges as it passes them.

This property is very useful to astronomers, as it allows them to make spectroscopes to analyse the light received from the stars. By passing the light through a diffraction grating, it can be 'smeared out' into it's component wavelengths and examined to determine what elements are in the star, how the star is moving, etc.

(Light can also be bent by passing it through gravitational fields, but that's a whole new ball-game!)
__________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day." - Douglas Adams

"Certainly, in the topsy-turvy world of heavy rock, having a good solid piece of wood in your hand is often useful." - Ian Faith
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2004, 01:11 AM
Wdnesday Wdnesday is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AGN Fuel
You're thinking of diffraction.
Ah, I knew it was some D-word. Thanks for clearing this up for me.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2004, 01:22 AM
Nanoda Nanoda is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 155
Default

Note that this effect is very small - you'll not illuminate the moon this way if the sun is being obscured by the earth.

Here's the Wikipedia entry.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2004, 01:26 AM
Wdnesday Wdnesday is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California
Posts: 5
Default

Thanks, Nanoda, for the link. That means I lost this argument completely. Glad I didn't bet anything!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2004, 01:45 AM
AGN Fuel's Avatar
AGN Fuel AGN Fuel is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The beautiful Central Coast, NSW
Posts: 2,437
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wdnesday
Thanks, Nanoda, for the link. That means I lost this argument completely. Glad I didn't bet anything!
Well, here's one you can get him back with!

If he still doesn't believe that light can bend, tell him that at the exact moment when the sun appears to touch the horizon at sunrise or sunset, it is actually physically still below the horizon! The position of the sun is an illusion!

The Earth's atmosphere refracts sunlight approximately 35 arcseconds when the sun appears to be on the horizon, but the disc of the sun itself is around 30 arcseconds in diameter. This means that when the sun is physically just below the horizon, refraction still allows us to see it.

If you were looking at the sunrise at the precise moment that the bottom edge was on the horizon and someone then magically took away all of the atmosphere, the sun would instantly disappear back below the horizon, only to re-emerge a minute or so later as the Earth rotated it's true position into view! 8)
__________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day." - Douglas Adams

"Certainly, in the topsy-turvy world of heavy rock, having a good solid piece of wood in your hand is often useful." - Ian Faith
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2004, 04:58 AM
Celestial Mechanic's Avatar
Celestial Mechanic Celestial Mechanic is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 4,543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AGN Fuel
[Snip!]The Earth's atmosphere refracts sunlight approximately 35 arcseconds when the sun appears to be on the horizon, but the disc of the sun itself is around 30 arcseconds in diameter. This means that when the sun is physically just below the horizon, refraction still allows us to see it.[Snip!]
Actually the figure is more like 35 arcminutes for the refraction, but it varies depending on meteorological conditions. For calculating sunrises and sunsets the standard procedure is to take the standard refraction to be 34 arcminutes and the radius of the Sun to be 16 arcminutes so that sunrise/sunset is the moment when the center of the Sun's disk is 90 degrees 50 minutes from the zenith.
__________________
Microsoft is over if you want it.

The bar has been lowered for the promotion of ATM ideas; the bar for the acceptance of ATM ideas must remain high.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2004, 05:55 AM
AGN Fuel's Avatar
AGN Fuel AGN Fuel is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The beautiful Central Coast, NSW
Posts: 2,437
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Celestial Mechanic
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGN Fuel
[Snip!]The Earth's atmosphere refracts sunlight approximately 35 arcseconds when the sun appears to be on the horizon, but the disc of the sun itself is around 30 arcseconds in diameter. This means that when the sun is physically just below the horizon, refraction still allows us to see it.[Snip!]
Actually the figure is more like 35 arcminutes for the refraction, but it varies depending on meteorological conditions. For calculating sunrises and sunsets the standard procedure is to take the standard refraction to be 34 arcminutes and the radius of the Sun to be 16 arcminutes so that sunrise/sunset is the moment when the center of the Sun's disk is 90 degrees 50 minutes from the zenith.
#-o Dyslexic fingers! 35 arcseconds....... #-o

I knew what I meant, anyhow! ops:
__________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day." - Douglas Adams

"Certainly, in the topsy-turvy world of heavy rock, having a good solid piece of wood in your hand is often useful." - Ian Faith
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2004, 02:20 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 17,744
Default

There also is another neat moon-lighting effect called Earthshine. When the moon is less than full, you can sometimes seen the unlite part of the moon, but much fainter. This is caused by light reflecting off the Earth and illuminating the moon. Links below to some further explanation and a nice picture:
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...earthshine.htm

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap020419.html
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today