Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-February-2004, 10:10 PM
sarongsong's Avatar
sarongsong sarongsong is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,307
Default 2012 alignment question

Can this statement be proven or disproven with a conventional astronomy program:
"2012---Earth comes into perfect “precessional” alignment with the center of the Galaxy..."
Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-February-2004, 10:19 PM
starnut starnut is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 28
Default

Is Mayan astronomy considered 'conventional'?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-February-2004, 10:30 PM
sarongsong's Avatar
sarongsong sarongsong is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,307
Default

Something that runs under Win98 on a PII, please.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-February-2004, 10:35 PM
majic majic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 197
Send a message via ICQ to majic
Default Re: 2012 alignment question

Quote:
Originally Posted by sarongsong
Can this statement be proven or disproven with a conventional astronomy program:
"2012---Earth comes into perfect “precessional” alignment with the center of the Galaxy..."
Thanks.
I think a finer definition of "aligned" must be stated here before any serious answer can be given. Aligned to what effect ?

This particular solar system we are in is located on the edge of the milky way, in Orions belt. We arent exactly level with the galaxy's equatorial plane - about 20 lightyears "above" it, yet on a galaxy-scale this is pretty insignifcant. Alignment from center is roughly some 27,000 lightyears (which is, If my memory serves me well, 70,000 lightyears in diameter) .

I'm not sure what difference there will be in 12 years on that huge scale - we're not doing "much", galaxy-wise. Things happen on the multi-million year scale there, not specific "one year" things occur really. Anyone feel free to correct me here, obviously.
__________________
Quid quid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-February-2004, 10:38 PM
starnut starnut is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 28
Default

The Sky might do.Orions 'Where the stars are" is sort of share ware version of Bisques program. It would probably let you run the equinoxes/solstices around if you so desired.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-February-2004, 12:13 AM
starnut starnut is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 28
Default

Holy smokes!! Now I see what all you guys are on about here.I googled 'galactic alignment' and got a real eye opener! Woo Woo...Woo. I would have never imagined it. The only thing I knew about 2012 was that it marked the end of the Mayan calender. You guys have realy got your work cut out for you!



cheers
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-February-2004, 01:07 AM
Eta C's Avatar
Eta C Eta C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Heart of Darkness
Posts: 1,585
Default

The "end" of the Mayan calandar has been discussed in several threads before. I'll link to them if others don't beat me to it. My understanding is that it isn't the END in the aspect that there's nothing beyond it. It's just the start of a new cycle. Sort of like a car with a 5 digit odometer rolling over to all 0's after 100,000 miles. The car doesn't automatically fall apart at that point (although it sometimes seems that way ). Any "alignments" in 2012 are probably in the mind of the person proposing them and will have as little effect on the earth as any of the last three or four have.

My guess is that it's all a conspiracy by businesses that got left with a lot of survivalist equipment inventory after Y2K. They needed something to get the public to buy their junk, and this conveniently arose. Boy, that is easy to do. 8)
__________________
"I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind." - William Thompson, 1st Baron Lord Kelvin

"If it was so, it might be, and if it were so, it would be, but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic!" - Tweedledee

This isn't right. This isn't even wrong. - Wolfgang Pauli
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-February-2004, 02:42 AM
sarongsong's Avatar
sarongsong sarongsong is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,307
Default

Thanks, majic, that's a good way of looking at it, and to starnut for the program suggestions. Despite the subject date, it is NOT meant to further discuss a certain calendar here.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-February-2004, 03:12 AM
Charlie in Dayton Charlie in Dayton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ...three guesses, and the first two don't count...
Posts: 2,009
Default

First off, what's a 'precessional alignment'? That the procedure the guy at the end of the street is advertising for only $29.99 (pickups and SUV's slightly higher)?

Let's define our terminology. By definition, precession means something moving. If it's going to align with anything, that alignment only lasts for a split instant, then the whatever has moved on. The phrase is a bit oxymoronic to me.
__________________
"If a tree is cut down in the rainforest, and is used to make paper to print a book, and the book is really bad, and there's nobody that will read it, do you still hear a sucking sound?"
Charlie in Dayton, A.AsC.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-February-2004, 06:42 AM
starnut starnut is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 28
Default

OK sarongsong. I went home and dug out a copy of 'Where the stars are'.
I ran it back and forth around the 21 Dec time frame. The closest ol Sol came was RA 18.3.32.2 hr DEC 23.26.2 deg. Thats not so close to the big vaccum cleaner center. But it is somewhere near Sagittarius anyway. Maybe a more 'industrial strength' program would return better results. And while on the subject of software, I found a copy of 'The Earth centered universe'. The signifigance in that is that it has a LX-200 command set that functions. I used it for checking all the 'frankenstein' cables people were asking me to make.




cheers
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-February-2004, 07:12 AM
sarongsong's Avatar
sarongsong sarongsong is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,307
Default

Quote:
...let's define our terminology...Charlie
OK, how about the astronomical alignment of the Precessional Cycle of the Winter Solstice and Galactic Center?
Quote:
...dug out a copy of 'Where the stars are'...The closest ol Sol came was RA 18.3.32.2 hr DEC 23.26.2 deg...Maybe a more 'industrial strength' program would return better results...---starnut
Thanks for checking. Have read of differing dates: 1998, 2000 and, of course, 2012.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 02-February-2004, 07:36 AM
Archer17 Archer17 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,158
Default


Is the above, from someplace like this have any relation to what you seek sarongsong? If so, you should be posting this somewhere else. Like 'Against the Mainstream' at least. Woowoo stuff doesn't belong in this forum and you should know that.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-February-2004, 08:26 AM
starnut starnut is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 28
Default

Zooks! Have I been had so soon?? I would appreciate not digging through a mountain of stuff for silly reasons. Sarongsong please explain. Are you foolin' around or do you just want to know about free or inexpensive software?


GRRRRR.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 02-February-2004, 08:52 AM
Charlie in Dayton Charlie in Dayton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ...three guesses, and the first two don't count...
Posts: 2,009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sarongsong
Quote:
...let's define our terminology...Charlie
OK, how about the astronomical alignment of the Precessional Cycle of the Winter Solstice and Galactic Center?
If I read this right (and there's no guarantee of that), are we talking about the Earth's rotational axis pointing directly at The Center Of The Known Universe? (Yeah, that's stretching things a tad, but you get my drift...)

Okay. So it does. So what?

This means something special? We're going to finally see the Age of Aquarius? The Lieder/Hoagland ticket will sweep The First Annual One-World One-Government elections? The Face On Mars speaks, thereby revealing itself as either Ambrose Bierce or J.F. Crater? The water swirls the other way when I flush? What?
__________________
"If a tree is cut down in the rainforest, and is used to make paper to print a book, and the book is really bad, and there's nobody that will read it, do you still hear a sucking sound?"
Charlie in Dayton, A.AsC.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 02-February-2004, 10:25 AM
majic majic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 197
Send a message via ICQ to majic
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by starnut
Zooks! Have I been had so soon?? I would appreciate not digging through a mountain of stuff for silly reasons. Sarongsong please explain. Are you foolin' around or do you just want to know about free or inexpensive software?


GRRRRR.
Drugs are bad mmmmkay?

[ appearently they ARE bad, I just -re-read the entire thread and missed the word "program" in the topic starters posting - way to go majic... ]
__________________
Quid quid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 02-February-2004, 03:42 PM
sarongsong's Avatar
sarongsong sarongsong is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,307
Default

Quote:
Sarongsong please explain---starnut
My original ASTRONOMICAL question (as amended) is pretty clear and was crafted specifically to avoid Archer17's innuendo and list-cop tendencies. I appreciate your and others' efforts to answer it. (My interest lies with Terence McKenna, BTW.) If a conventional computer simulation program is capable of demonstrating the event, then I will obtain it.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 02-February-2004, 04:13 PM
Eroica's Avatar
Eroica Eroica is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dubh Linn
Posts: 3,630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sarongsong
OK, how about the astronomical alignment of the Precessional Cycle of the Winter Solstice and Galactic Center?
Have read of differing dates: 1998, 2000 and, of course, 2012.
According to Starry Night, the Winter Solstice crossed the Galactic equator in 1998.

[Edited for stupid spelling mistake]
__________________
- Learn a lot teaching others.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 02-February-2004, 05:10 PM
Archer17 Archer17 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sarongsong
..My original ASTRONOMICAL question (as amended) is pretty clear and was crafted specifically to avoid Archer17's innuendo and list-cop tendencies. I appreciate your and others' efforts to answer it. (My interest lies with Terence McKenna, BTW.) If a conventional computer simulation program is capable of demonstrating the event, then I will obtain it.
Whose making innuendos? When I saw your "astronomical" questions, namely:
Quote:
Can this statement be proven or disproven with a conventional astronomy program:
"2012---Earth comes into perfect “precessional” alignment with the center of the Galaxy..." Thanks.
and
Quote:
OK, how about the astronomical alignment of the Precessional Cycle of the Winter Solstice and Galactic Center?
I just looked it up. It's not like you simply asked for an astronomy program, you elaborated and that's what I responded to. This isn't exactly the first time you've introduced pseudoscience here. BTW Terence McKenna doesn't seem to be much of an astronomer although he did seem to share your interest in 2012. From the link (emphasis added):
Quote:
..The Time Wave was a graph that, in theory, corresponded to the introduction of new ideas and dramatic change throughout history. When the graph dipped, more novelty entered the world. McKenna lined up his graph against human history, and somehow determined that the Zero Point, the Eschaton, was scheduled for Dec. 21, 2012, which also coincidentally happened to be the end of the 10,000 year calendar used by the Mayans.
Coincidence?
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 02-February-2004, 06:55 PM
sarongsong's Avatar
sarongsong sarongsong is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,307
Default

Quote:
According to Starry Night, the Winter Solstice crossed the Galactic equater in 1998---Eroica
Thanks, Eroica, for answering my question as stated. Will set about getting Starry Night. Case closed.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 02-February-2004, 07:43 PM
milli360's Avatar
milli360 milli360 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 2,464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eroica
Quote:
Originally Posted by sarongsong
OK, how about the astronomical alignment of the Precessional Cycle of the Winter Solstice and Galactic Center?
Have read of differing dates: 1998, 2000 and, of course, 2012.
According to Starry Night, the Winter Solstice crossed the Galactic equater in 1998.
What did it say about the summe4 solstice?
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 02-February-2004, 08:59 PM
A.DIM's Avatar
A.DIM A.DIM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,477
Default

I've always understood Precession described as a spinning, wobbling top... as shown in this diagram.

Anyone read Hamlet's Mill?
Reply With Quote
  #