|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
For other astronomical stereograph, visit http://139.134.5.123/tiddler2/stereographe...bula/nebula.htm
Last edited by Harry : 24-October-2005 at 11:06 AM. |
|
||||
|
very cool, harry. Would you allow me to add to your post, to clarify for anyone who hasn't had experience with stereographs?
You know those "magic eye"s kids do, to see the hidden 3D picture in the background of a mess of images? Just like 3D movies, that's basically what you're doing here. You don't need special glasses, though, you just sorta blur your eyes and let the two images (which had to have been taken from different, steroscopic perspective, like you do when each of your eyes combines two different images) come together to form a third stereo image. It gives you a sence of depth in the picture, and thus, a sense of 3 dimesions. Just like the magic eyes, you can start by having your face close to the image, then moving back slowly until they focus and combine. In the end you'll see athird image in stereo that you'll be focused on, sandwiched between two other images you'll be seeing with your peripheral vison. The best tip I can give you from learning how to do this myself: Start small. The larger the image, the harder it is to do. So maybe save this image and scale it down, then once you get the hang of seeing stereo images, you can do it with progressively larger images. Truly a wonderful experience! fourmilab has all of it's "solar system live" diagrams available in stereo, and it has a great step-by-steper to help you get started if you need extra help. http://www.fourmilab.ch/solar/help/stereo.html for details... Have fun!!!!
__________________
~ cogito cogito ergo cogito sum ~ Nothing in life is good nor bad; thinking makes it so. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
i concur - fanastic work!
__________________
Damien, International Baccalaureate Physics teacher Spectroradiometry Instrumentation Major Admin: Pacific Science and Art |
|
|||
|
Blinkin Fantastic Harry. But my wife thought I was NUTS as she was observing me without myself realizing it. As I'm sitting here going cross-eyed! All I heard was some giggling!
I looked up still partically cross-eyed and she was smirking like a cheshire cat. Too funny! But I got my revenge when I showed her your pictures and told her how to look at them. The expression was well worth it as she tried to get her eye's to focus the image. Good stuff... Paul
__________________
Paul Greenhalgh Fraser Valley Astronomers Soc. (President) Merritt Astronomical Soc. (President) http://www.fvas.net British Columbia Canada |
|
|||
|
Quote:
The followings are the new stereograph based on HST images. ![]() ![]() |
|
|||
|
Perhaps someone may have question on the credibility of those synthesized stereograph. The principle of method to gain the deviation from focal point for each point on the picture is the same as that of passive autofocus used for some digital cameras. The following pictures are the original photo of IC4406 taken by HST and its contour of deviation from focal point. That contour was drawn by the software Contourer. For other examples of contour of that deviation, please visit;
http://www.geocities.com/q17320508/contour...y/planetary.htm |
|
|||
|
After a little thought, I actually understood what the graph is showing and I am amazed at the accuracy of the deviation measurements.
While I was trying to determine the meaning of the method used, I began to wonder if a more accurate method might be possible: Since the orbit of the Earth is ~584M miles, and light travels ~186K MPS, it should be possible to make phase relationship measurements between actual point sources(target) from close points(objective) on our orbit, while moving across and perpindicular to the wave boundary, of the light from an interstellar object. Wouldn't these types of measurements give a more accurate interpretation? This is assuming the CCD Camera discrimination is fine enough for something more than a coarse measurement such as the range finder mechanism which measures the strength of a field view, rather than individual point objects. Or am I totally off course on this? |
|
|||
|
They really are amazing pictures! It's not often you see a detailed astrophoto of a nebula.
![]()
__________________
Mae hen wlad fy nhadau yn annwyl i mi, Gwlad beirdd a chantorion, enwogion o fri; Ei gwrol ryfelwyr, gwladgarwyr tra mad, Tros ryddid collasant eu gwaed. Gwlad, gwlad, pleidiol wyf i'm gwlad, Tra môr yn fur I'r bur hoff bau, O bydded i'r hen iaith barhau. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|