Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astrophotography
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 19-May-2005, 02:28 PM
Harry Harry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 47
Default

For other astronomical stereograph, visit http://139.134.5.123/tiddler2/stereographe...bula/nebula.htm
Attached Images
File Type: jpg HorseheadNebula-2-3-inv.jpg (22.1 KB, 31 views)

Last edited by Harry : 24-October-2005 at 11:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 19-May-2005, 11:38 PM
aeolus's Avatar
aeolus aeolus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 522
Send a message via MSN to aeolus
Default

very cool, harry. Would you allow me to add to your post, to clarify for anyone who hasn't had experience with stereographs?

You know those "magic eye"s kids do, to see the hidden 3D picture in the background of a mess of images? Just like 3D movies, that's basically what you're doing here. You don't need special glasses, though, you just sorta blur your eyes and let the two images (which had to have been taken from different, steroscopic perspective, like you do when each of your eyes combines two different images) come together to form a third stereo image. It gives you a sence of depth in the picture, and thus, a sense of 3 dimesions.

Just like the magic eyes, you can start by having your face close to the image, then moving back slowly until they focus and combine. In the end you'll see athird image in stereo that you'll be focused on, sandwiched between two other images you'll be seeing with your peripheral vison.

The best tip I can give you from learning how to do this myself: Start small. The larger the image, the harder it is to do. So maybe save this image and scale it down, then once you get the hang of seeing stereo images, you can do it with progressively larger images. Truly a wonderful experience!

fourmilab has all of it's "solar system live" diagrams available in stereo, and it has a great step-by-steper to help you get started if you need extra help. http://www.fourmilab.ch/solar/help/stereo.html for details...

Have fun!!!!
__________________
~ cogito cogito ergo cogito sum ~

Nothing in life is good nor bad; thinking makes it so.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 19-May-2005, 11:49 PM
aeolus's Avatar
aeolus aeolus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 522
Send a message via MSN to aeolus
Default

Wow. I just looked at them all, and some of them are amazing- especially the ones with bright stars in them; they totally pop out of the screen.

As I mentioned before, when starting off, smaller is better. If you left click each image, you can get an option to "view image" where it will open just the image in one's browser. If you do that and reduce the window, most browsers will scale the image to be smaller. I found this to be the simplest way of reducing the image size to make it easier for viewing.

Again, thatnks for the link, Harry, and have fun with these, everyone!
__________________
~ cogito cogito ergo cogito sum ~

Nothing in life is good nor bad; thinking makes it so.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 19-May-2005, 11:53 PM
Big Brother Dunk's Avatar
Big Brother Dunk Big Brother Dunk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Saskatoon, SK Canada
Posts: 965
Default

Very cool link Harry, thanks. B)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 20-May-2005, 02:15 PM
Harry Harry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 47
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by aeolus@May 19 2005, 11:49 PM
Wow. I just looked at them all, and some of them are amazing- especially the ones with bright stars in them; they totally pop out of the screen.

As I mentioned before, when starting off, smaller is better. If you left click each image, you can get an option to "view image" where it will open just the image in one's browser. If you do that and reduce the window, most browsers will scale the image to be smaller. I found this to be the simplest way of reducing the image size to make it easier for viewing.

Again, thatnks for the link, Harry, and have fun with these, everyone!
Thank you for your comments. I visited your site mentioned in the above posts. How fantastic the solar system stereograph is! By the way you've mentioned the anaglyph (i.e. stereograph with red-cyan glasses). I've also tried to synthesize anaglyph but so far couldn't reach sufficient result...
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 20-May-2005, 02:17 PM
Harry Harry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 47
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Big Brother Dunk@May 19 2005, 11:53 PM
Very cool link Harry, thanks. B)
I'm welcome!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 21-May-2005, 02:09 AM
imported_Josh
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The sterographs in your links, Harry, are bloody magnificent! Thanks for sharing them!!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 21-May-2005, 03:29 AM
damienpaul damienpaul is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 2,803
Default

i concur - fanastic work!
__________________
Damien,
International Baccalaureate Physics teacher
Spectroradiometry Instrumentation Major
Admin: Pacific Science and Art
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 21-May-2005, 03:32 AM
Tinaa Tinaa is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Texas USA
Posts: 2,711
Default

That is too cool. I can't wait until Monday to share the site with my students.
__________________
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 23-May-2005, 09:41 AM
Harry Harry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 47
Default

Thank you for your comments. The folowings are the new stereograph based on HST images.



Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 25-May-2005, 04:44 AM
drjgokhale drjgokhale is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 36
Default

Simply beautiful, and thank you for sharing the lovely pictures, and for the sites, too.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 27-May-2005, 12:32 AM
Harry Harry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 47
Default

I'm welcome!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 27-May-2005, 06:13 PM
FVAS FVAS is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 19
Default

Blinkin Fantastic Harry. But my wife thought I was NUTS as she was observing me without myself realizing it. As I'm sitting here going cross-eyed! All I heard was some giggling!

I looked up still partically cross-eyed and she was smirking like a cheshire cat.

Too funny! But I got my revenge when I showed her your pictures and told her how to look at them. The expression was well worth it as she tried to get her eye's to focus the image.

Good stuff...

Paul
__________________
Paul Greenhalgh
Fraser Valley Astronomers Soc. (President)
Merritt Astronomical Soc. (President)
http://www.fvas.net
British Columbia Canada
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 29-May-2005, 09:46 AM
Harry Harry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 47
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by FVAS@May 27 2005, 06:13 PM
Blinkin Fantastic Harry. But my wife thought I was NUTS as she was observing me without myself realizing it. As I'm sitting here going cross-eyed! All I heard was some giggling!

I looked up still partically cross-eyed and she was smirking like a cheshire cat.

Too funny! But I got my revenge when I showed her your pictures and told her how to look at them. The expression was well worth it as she tried to get her eye's to focus the image.

Good stuff...

Paul
Thank you for your comment. Have you and your wife been frozen watching those stereograph? I also have been frozen when watching some stereograph based on HST images. Indeed Hubble telescope's original images have the information much more than usual 2D photos.
The followings are the new stereograph based on HST images.


Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-June-2005, 11:39 AM
Harry Harry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 47
Default

Perhaps someone may have question on the credibility of those synthesized stereograph. The principle of method to gain the deviation from focal point for each point on the picture is the same as that of passive autofocus used for some digital cameras. The following pictures are the original photo of IC4406 taken by HST and its contour of deviation from focal point. That contour was drawn by the software Contourer. For other examples of contour of that deviation, please visit;

http://www.geocities.com/q17320508/contour...y/planetary.htm
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IC4406_contour.jpg (54.0 KB, 6 views)
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-June-2005, 06:41 PM
dragonmaster_us@hotmail.com dragonmaster_us@hotmail.com is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 24
Default

After a little thought, I actually understood what the graph is showing and I am amazed at the accuracy of the deviation measurements.

While I was trying to determine the meaning of the method used, I began to wonder if a more accurate method might be possible:

Since the orbit of the Earth is ~584M miles, and light travels ~186K MPS, it should be possible to make phase relationship measurements between actual point sources(target) from close points(objective) on our orbit, while moving across and perpindicular to the wave boundary, of the light from an interstellar object. Wouldn't these types of measurements give a more accurate interpretation? This is assuming the CCD Camera discrimination is fine enough for something more than a coarse measurement such as the range finder mechanism which measures the strength of a field view, rather than individual point objects.

Or am I totally off course on this?
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 10-June-2005, 03:17 PM
Capella Capella is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10
Default

They really are amazing pictures! It's not often you see a detailed astrophoto of a nebula.
__________________
Mae hen wlad fy nhadau yn annwyl i mi,
Gwlad beirdd a chantorion, enwogion o fri;
Ei gwrol ryfelwyr, gwladgarwyr tra mad,
Tros ryddid collasant eu gwaed.

Gwlad, gwlad, pleidiol wyf i'm gwlad,
Tra môr yn fur
I'r bur hoff bau,
O bydded i'r hen iaith barhau
.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 11-June-2005, 02:33 PM
Harry Harry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 47
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by dragonmaster_us@hotmail.com@Jun 6 2005, 06:41 PM
After a little thought, I actually understood what the graph is showing and I am amazed at the accuracy of the deviation measurements.

While I was trying to determine the meaning of the method used, I began to wonder if a more accurate method might be possible:

Since the orbit of the Earth is ~584M miles, and light travels ~186K MPS, it should be possible to make phase relationship measurements between actual point sources(target) from close points(objective) on our orbit, while moving across and perpindicular to the wave boundary, of the light from an interstellar object. Wouldn't these types of measurements give a more accurate interpretation? This is assuming the CCD Camera discrimination is fine enough for something more than a coarse measurement such as the range finder mechanism which measures the strength of a field view, rather than individual point objects.

Or am I totally off course on this?
I guess your method is based on that the phase of light from the star is observed differently on earth in different seasons, say, summer and winter. It's a nice idea, isn't it? Although most of light having visible light length coming from stars or nebulae is incoherent, if you select specific spectrum of polarized light among them, it might be possible to obtain accurate information of distance between the star or nebula and earth.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 11-June-2005, 02:39 PM
Harry Harry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 47
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Capella@Jun 10 2005, 03:17 PM
They really are amazing pictures! It's not often you see a detailed astrophoto of a nebula.
Thank you. The following image is the new stereograph of a nebula.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg M57_HST_2_3.jpg (33.8 KB, 10 views)
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 23-June-2005, 10:41 AM
Harry Harry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 47
Default

This is the stereograph for PN-Mz3.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg PN_Mz3_2_3.jpg (67.8 KB, 8 views)
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 30-June-2005, 02:00 AM
Harry Harry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 47
Default

Stereograph for Orion
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Orion_HST_2_3.jpg (41.8 KB, 12 views)
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 03-July-2005, 02:54 AM
Harry Harry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 47
Default

Stereogrph for Omega-M17
Attached Images
File Type: jpg HST_OMEGA_M17_2_3.jpg (46.6 KB, 7 views)
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 07-July-2005, 04:58 AM
Harry Harry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 47
Default

Stereograph for NGC 7027