Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astrophotography
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-February-2006, 10:29 AM
Dave Mitsky's Avatar
Dave Mitsky Dave Mitsky is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,843
Default The Lunar Dogleg, 2006/2/4 UT

Here's a shot of three prominent craters - Theophilus, Cyrillus, and Catharina (from left to right) - that I took on Friday night using the ASH 17" f/15 classical Cassegrain, a 32mm Brandon (eyepiece projection), and my Canon EOS Digital Rebel DSLR. Unfortunately, the seeing was not very good at the time.

Dave Mitsky
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Catharina et al 17-inch 32mm Brandon 2006-2-3.JPG (30.4 KB, 36 views)
__________________
Chance favors the prepared mind.
De gustibus non est disputandum.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-February-2006, 10:53 AM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 8,224
Default

Nice. Just out of curiosity, why is the date in the thread title 2006/2/7?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-February-2006, 12:17 PM
Dave Mitsky's Avatar
Dave Mitsky Dave Mitsky is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,843
Default

It's a typo. Thanks for the head's up.

Dave Mitsky
__________________
Chance favors the prepared mind.
De gustibus non est disputandum.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-February-2006, 12:16 AM
Fr. Wayne's Avatar
Fr. Wayne Fr. Wayne is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oak Forest, IL
Posts: 1,293
Default

32 mm? That is darn close up. Just how close-up can you shoot?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-February-2006, 06:29 PM
Dave Mitsky's Avatar
Dave Mitsky Dave Mitsky is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,843
Default

The 17" f/15 classical Cassegrain at the Naylor Observatory has an extremely long focal length of 6477mm. I could go to a much higher image scale very easily by using a shorter focal length eyepiece (or using the variable extension tube section of the camera adapter) but ultimately the seeing (i.e., atmospheric steadiness) and the resolution of the telescope puts a limit on what can be done.

http://www.astrohbg.org/gallery2/Tour-of-Naylor/17_inch

Dave Mitsky
__________________
Chance favors the prepared mind.
De gustibus non est disputandum.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-February-2006, 11:40 PM
Dave Mitsky's Avatar
Dave Mitsky Dave Mitsky is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,843
Default

I reprocessed the image a bit. Here it is.

Dave Mitsky
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Catherina et al 17-inch 32mm Brandon 2006-2-3 (small).jpg (54.7 KB, 17 views)
__________________
Chance favors the prepared mind.
De gustibus non est disputandum.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-February-2006, 06:08 AM
Fr. Wayne's Avatar
Fr. Wayne Fr. Wayne is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oak Forest, IL
Posts: 1,293
Default

looks great! about 5th day phase, Mares Nectaris with ridge off of Madler all the way to Altai Scarp highlighted. The depth of Theophilus plus the wall from Cyrillus to Catharina. If you didn't enlarge it much, I'd say that you are easily capturing 500 km diameters and since Theo is about 90 km across you can detail as good as Lick Obs. 36" refract. with features as small as 20 km easy. Since it wasn't a good seeing night. What is your take on smallest feature you can photograph at Nayler Obs.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today