|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
hi guys,
8 weeks passed by without one single chance for decent astrophotography except 1st of november when I imaged the comet: http://www.stargazer-observatory.com/holmes2.html these days we have clear skies with superb transparency,...but seeing is really at its worse! minus 10 on pickering's scale... so I had some time to write up my thoughts covering the interesting topic monochromatic vs OSC - quite frankly, I tend to feel, that these different types of CCD do not necessarily need to be competitors....but please find time to check this out: MONO vs OSC: http://www.stargazer-observatory.com/mono_vs_osc.html I'd appreciate any comments and thoughts you might have. I know we have discussed this a couple of times,...it's just my attempt, to beat the DSI-less time for me here,... |
|
|||
|
Very Good informative article Diets, I was thinking of getting a SBIG ST2000XCM i'm in debate to hold off and get the mono version but with a $700 difference. I never used a OSC and used CcdSoft on my ST402ME it has dark and subtract feature would it do the same with the OSC?. CcdOps has a feature to combine and show live the image in color but not sure if auto dark is applied in the process either. Anyway Thanks again
|
|
||||
|
Thanks for the informative article. Ihave wondered If all the extra exposure time for mono is really worth the effort when I have seen some of the marvelous OSC work out there. Given your analysis it seems that flexibilty is the key mono advantage.
Kind regards Matt |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|