Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astrophotography
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 19-December-2007, 09:38 PM
stargazer_7000's Avatar
stargazer_7000 stargazer_7000 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Linz, Austria
Posts: 462
Send a message via Skype™ to stargazer_7000
Default MONO vs OSC...competitors?

hi guys,

8 weeks passed by without one single chance for decent astrophotography except 1st of november when I imaged the
comet:
http://www.stargazer-observatory.com/holmes2.html

these days we have clear skies with superb transparency,...but seeing is really at its worse! minus 10 on pickering's scale...
so I had some time to write up my thoughts covering the interesting topic
monochromatic vs OSC - quite frankly, I tend to feel, that these different types of CCD do not necessarily need to be competitors....but please find time to check this out:
MONO vs OSC:
http://www.stargazer-observatory.com/mono_vs_osc.html

I'd appreciate any comments and thoughts you might have.

I know we have discussed this a couple of times,...it's just my attempt, to beat the DSI-less time for me here,...
__________________
best regards,
Dietmar
-------------
www.stargazer-observatory.com
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 19-December-2007, 10:24 PM
RickJ RickJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mantrap Lake, MN
Posts: 913
Default

Interesting. I've never used OSC but your conclusions mirror what I had decided about them. Did you compare mono filtered color using binned color data to speed up that side of the collection process? How would that compare in quality and time needed? I bin 3x3 for color most of the time, unless the subject is really bright, and see little to no loss in the final image quality yet save a lot of imaging time by doing this. How it compares to OSC I don't have any idea.

Rick
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 19-December-2007, 11:37 PM
JAICOA JAICOA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: AGUADILLA, PUERTO RICO
Posts: 1,848
Default

Very Good informative article Diets, I was thinking of getting a SBIG ST2000XCM i'm in debate to hold off and get the mono version but with a $700 difference. I never used a OSC and used CcdSoft on my ST402ME it has dark and subtract feature would it do the same with the OSC?. CcdOps has a feature to combine and show live the image in color but not sure if auto dark is applied in the process either. Anyway Thanks again
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 20-December-2007, 07:57 PM
winensky's Avatar
winensky winensky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 693
Default

Thanks for the informative article. Ihave wondered If all the extra exposure time for mono is really worth the effort when I have seen some of the marvelous OSC work out there. Given your analysis it seems that flexibilty is the key mono advantage.

Kind regards
Matt
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today