Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astrophotography
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 15-January-2008, 09:04 PM
RickJ RickJ is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mantrap Lake, MN
Posts: 913
Default Earth "grazer" 2008AF3

I wanted to get this guy as he passed by at closest approach on the 13th. But it was snowing. Last night about 11 UT it finally cleared enough for me to get it. One problem. Orbital elements I'd gotten earlier in the evening were already wrong. I checked again with the Minor Planet Center and new ones were up. These worked. But it was moving so fast just trying to intercept this guy wasn't easy. I had to work ahead of it and let it come to me. Here's 10 minutes tracked on the asteroid. It's the dot in the center. Image scale is 1.5" per pixel. This guy was moving nearly .6 seconds of arc per second of time. North is up, west to the right in this image. It was in the middle of Bootes when taken. It will be in Serpens Caput by the time it rises late tonight. It was about 435,000 miles away when this was taken, still rather close. It came within about 230,000 miles, a bit under .0025 AU.

14" LX200R, 10 minutes, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Rick
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2008AF3-STOPPED10X1_1-15.444097-08r.jpg (109.4 KB, 204 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 15-January-2008, 11:20 PM
Veeger's Avatar
Veeger Veeger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 775
Default

That pic seems technically remarkable to me! Its awesome!

-Veeger
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 16-January-2008, 02:26 AM
kvwood kvwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 155
Default

Well done Rick!

Kent
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 16-January-2008, 05:15 AM
winensky's Avatar
winensky winensky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 693
Default

Great work finding this one Rick.

Kind regards
Matt
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 16-January-2008, 07:30 AM
RickJ RickJ is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mantrap Lake, MN
Posts: 913
Default

I should add that it is thought to be about 19 meters across. If someone told me when I first got into this hobby in the early 50's that technology would come far enough an amateur could photograph a 19 meter asteroid at over 400,000 miles and track it while doing so I'd have thought them nuts. For 50 years before I got into the hobby it had changed little as to technology. Boy has that changed!

Rick
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 16-January-2008, 10:47 AM
Whirlpool's Avatar
Whirlpool Whirlpool is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MNL
Posts: 2,542
Send a message via Yahoo to Whirlpool Send a message via Skype™ to Whirlpool
Default

Nice Work Rick!

__________________
Jean
-----
"The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing." - Albert Einsteiin
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2008, 02:40 AM
JAICOA JAICOA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: AGUADILLA, PUERTO RICO
Posts: 1,848
Default

You should be really proud Rick, It's very amazing of it's size and capture. Nicely done and clear skies.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 18-January-2008, 10:50 AM
rtomes rtomes is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 737
Default

I am impressed.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 18-January-2008, 10:43 PM
RickJ RickJ is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mantrap Lake, MN
Posts: 913
Default

Thanks all.

Finding it wasn't hard once I had good orbital elements but seeing it was. It was predicted at 17.8 magnitude which is easy for a slow moving asteroid in the main belt but not one speeding by at less than a half million miles away. It was on any one pixel for less than a second when tracking at sideral rate so didn't show. It was only after I programmed in the offsets in both axes that it showed up. Centering it turned off the asteroid tracking and turning that back on took time, moving it well off center by the time I could do so. I finally estimated where it would be one minute later, centered that, started the offset tracking rates and started recording. It worked.

Now if we get another one I'll know what to do. Also my brain doesn't function at anywhere near full capacity at 5 a.m. which didn't help. I did forget to turn on PEC so there's some wobble to the star tracks. Fortunately, even without PEC activated the tracking error is not much greater than my seeing.

Rick
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2008, 05:09 PM
skinnert skinnert is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4
Default

Great picture!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 30-June-2008, 11:57 PM
publiusr publiusr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,292
Default

It really is.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-July-2008, 05:14 PM
tvdavis tvdavis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Inkom, ID
Posts: 321
Default

Cool!

Tom
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-July-2008, 10:33 PM
chrissy's Avatar
chrissy chrissy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Co.Durham.England
Posts: 12,361
Default

wow! Rick.

clear skies
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas,average minds discuss events,small minds discuss people.Admiral Hyman Rickover.USN.

"Make the most of every day like it could be your last, enjoy each others companyas this will make good memories for when we pass". chrissy


Quote:
Originally Posted by swift
HR: Of course it was. So I take it as, no. When you invent things, such as the Universe, do you work better in a team environment, or by yourself?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cosmogeology Margiani Against the Mainstream 146 17-February-2007 01:19 PM
Earth's axes shifted, what does this mean? EX Astronomy 50 11-January-2005 09:40 PM
Link(s) About Why We Are Alone Bill Thmpson Against the Mainstream 244 11-July-2004 01:03 AM
Discussion: Gravity Probe B's First Month In ... Fraser Universe Today Story Comments 2 26-May-2004 06:26 AM
idle moon math Geo3gh Astronomy 550 06-September-2002 06:19 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today