If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astrophotography
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 29-January-2008, 10:28 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman iceman is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Gosford, Australia
Posts: 428
Thumbs up Three views of the International Space Station (ISS)

Hi all

After a long break, interrupted due to changing jobs, new laptops, processing planetary and deep-space images - I finally got around to finish processing the two ISS images captured on the 26th and 28th of December 2007.

They were two spectacular passes, magnitude -2.4, passing about 70° overhead - though I could only capture them for about 40-50 seconds each, because of trees blocking the horizons.

I put my 12" newt on the dob base (not on the EQ mount), and aligned the finderscope with a star. I tracked the ISS manually by peering through the finderscope and moving the tube, trying to keep the fast moving bright dot centered on the crosshairs while my DMK21AU04 (in a 2x barlow) was recording at 60fps. Exposure used was 1/1200s and gain was almost maximum. Out of about 2500 frames captures, less than 100 had the ISS on them, and not all of those were sharp. I need to get a better hit rate!

It was an adrenalin rush, trying to get everything working for such a short period of time. On both occassions I forgot to press record in IC-Capture until about 5 seconds had passed! doh! And at the same time I had my Canon 350D and 17-70mm Sigma lens tracking on my EQ mount, pointed at the sky - and I had to remember to press the shutter remote to start the 2 minute exposure for the widefield view. Unfortunately I didn't have time to focus the lens accurately so the stars are blobby.

After all of that, i'm very pleased with the results though.
Thanks to Ralf Vandebergh for helping me to identify the structures.

The first image is from the 26th December, and the animated gif of the best frames for that session can be seen here:
ISS Animated Gif - 26th December 2007

The first image is from the 28th December, and the animated gif of the best frames for that session can be seen here:
ISS Animated Gif - 28th December 2007

The third image is the widefield view from the 26th.

Thanks for looking, comments welcome.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20071226-iss.jpg (93.3 KB, 90 views)
File Type: jpg 20071228-iss.jpg (93.9 KB, 77 views)
File Type: jpg 20071226-orion-iss-low.jpg (96.6 KB, 76 views)
__________________
Mike
. IceInSpace - The Australian Amateur Astronomy Community
. My Bio | My Jupiter 2007 Gallery | My Image Gallery
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 29-January-2008, 11:11 PM
KaiYeves's Avatar
KaiYeves KaiYeves is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Currently on assignment on planet shown in avatar photo
Posts: 6,824
Default

Sweet!
__________________
Rovers forever! - ToSeek
"The only way to explore the universe is to go and look." - Brian Cox
Well, the best way to find out is to go there and, find out. - Raven's Cry
'Evolution and science are one thing, but you don’t mess with Yoko Ono. Everybody knows that. ' - 386sx
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 29-January-2008, 11:42 PM
JAICOA JAICOA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: AGUADILLA, PUERTO RICO
Posts: 1,635
Default

Mike you did it again, Congrats on a great capture of ISS. Very sharp lots of structures easily ID. Welldone and Clear Skies
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 29-January-2008, 11:43 PM
RickJ RickJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mantrap Lake, MN
Posts: 761
Default

Very nice. I tried it once, failed miserably and haven't tried again. Well done!

Rick
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2008, 12:47 PM
winensky's Avatar
winensky winensky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 583
Default

Mike,

You take some marvelous images of this station.Thanks for sharing

Kind regards
Matt
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2008, 04:51 PM
smasraum smasraum is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Friendswood (Houston), TX
Posts: 12
Default

Outstanding!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2008, 09:07 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman iceman is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Gosford, Australia
Posts: 428
Default

Thanks for your comments, guys.

I've only tried this 4 times - the first time I got an overexposed blob, the second time I got a whole avi of black frames with not a single hit recorded, and the third and fourth times are the results above.
It's essential to get the finderscope as accurately aligned as possible, get the focus spot on, and make a rough guess at the exposure. I usually put the 12" newt on my EQ mount to get focus right (so the star doesn't move) and rough adjustment on the finderscope, then move it to the dob base to align the finderscope again. I've found that looking through the finderscope even on a slightly different angle can mean hitting or missing the ISS in the FOV.

I guess at the exposure, starting at around 1/1200s for a bright overhead pass. I'm guessing it would need to be a bit less for dimmer passes.

For processing, I go through the avi in virtual dub, deleting the blank or blurry frames. When all that's left is frames with bits of the ISS in them, I save them as bitmaps. I then use ninox/ppmcentre to centre the ISS in the frame and crop the frame to something like 400x400.

I then hand-select the sharpest, best frames and layer (stack) them in photoshop, then save as tiff, take into registax for slight wavelet sharpening.

For the second shot above, I was lucky enough to capture a few frames where the ISS went behind a tree - this reduced the exposure and the overexposed areas (eg: the radiator on the right) came out at about the right exposure. So I processed them independantly, and used a layer mask to combine it with the overexposed one.

I look forward to trying again in a few days with another bright overhead pass - but the weather doesn't look good!
__________________
Mike
. IceInSpace - The Australian Amateur Astronomy Community
. My Bio | My Jupiter 2007 Gallery | My Image Gallery
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-February-2008, 08:15 PM
NGCHunter's Avatar
NGCHunter NGCHunter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 199
Default

Fantastic shot, amazing detail, especially for hand tracking.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Elemental Energy Wave/Particle; definitely Against the Mainstream Bogie Against the Mainstream 358 30-January-2007 12:05 AM
Soyuz Launches to the International Space Station Fraser Universe Today Story Comments 0 11-September-2005 03:29 AM
Asking For Assistance skwirlinator Astronomy 9 28-April-2005 05:18 PM
100+ Space products and services cygonaut Space Exploration 0 07-October-2003 09:55 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today