|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
What with nearly two months of clouds or full moon I took a second look at my shot of Arp 206. There were many background galaxies. Most I found nothing on but 9 objects were listed in NED. While the background galaxies all looked very distant that wasn't the case. One is likely a member of the Arp 206 system showing a radial velocity putting it slightly closer than the two main galaxies. It must be a really tiny galaxy. All others were at least 560 million light years to over 2 million light years. Three are quasars though one galaxy looks the same as the three QSOs. Below is a cropped portion of the original image with 9 objects marked can you figure out which is the close one and which are the very distant ones? Size and brightness don't help much!
Below I've listed them in order of increasing distance. How many did you get right? . . . . . . Galaxies 2: SDSS J105205.52+362836.3 magnitude 17.9 33 million light years 4: PGC 2081645 magnitude 17.1 Distance 563 million light years 5: SDSS J105133.55+363053.3 magnitude 17.9 570 million light years 6: SDSS J105141.30+363653.4 magnitude 16.1 570 million light years 1: SDSS J105243.56+362925.6 magnitude 17.9 1.676 billion light years 3: SDSS J105203.05+363205.0 magnitude 18.9 2.786 billion light years QSOs (corrected) 7: CSO 295 magnitude 16.8 5.66 billion light years 8: SDSS J105158.68+364326.1 19.0 magnitude 7.321 billion light years 9: SDSS J105242.50+364335.7 19.3 magnitude 8.09 billion light years When originally posted I reversed 7 and 8. Got to type these up when I'm not so tired. Rick Last edited by RickJ : 21-June-2008 at 09:36 PM. Reason: Corrected error on 7 an 8 |
|
|||
|
Drat -- I see I reversed 7 and 8. Only one person emailed me to ask why 7 was so bright yet listed as mag 19. Easy when you can't type straight. I've corrected the original post. Sorry for the error.
Rick |
|
|||
|
I've noted further ones in other posts. For example see:
Too many galaxies? Abell 1367 Note these are light travel distances. The distance the light traveled to get to us. Since the universe has been expanding all those 8 billion years it was much closer than that when light left it but expansion along the way caused it to take a bit over 8 billion years to reach us. Currently it is much farther away. That assumes it still exists which is unlikely. Rick |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Scientist reworks star distances | Sticks | Astronomy | 1 | 29-September-2007 09:42 PM |
| Sizes and Distances | Jeff Root | Astronomy | 8 | 16-July-2005 11:35 AM |
| Non-redshift distances to Type 1A SN | antoniseb | Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories | 0 | 06-August-2004 09:43 AM |
| Need some more information about Hubble's Law | Littlemews | Questions and Answers | 3 | 04-December-2003 06:44 PM |
| Charlie Duke on judging distances on the Moon | Conspiracy Theories | 3 | 08-July-2002 02:52 AM | |