Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Astrophotography
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-September-2009, 09:29 PM
RickJ's Avatar
RickJ RickJ is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mantrap Lake, MN
Posts: 1,628
Default Arp 271 The start of a collision?

Arp 271, in Virgo is a rather classic Arp pair, much photographed compared to most Arp galaxies. Thus my desire for a better night than I had. It is two spiral galaxies, NGC 5426 (bottom) and NGC 5427 that are just now starting to interact as they orbit by each other, apparently for the first time. Some distortion can be seen in each galaxy. The arms of NGC 5426 seem to reaching out to connect with NGC 5427. It in turn has some tidal effects showing. But we are seeing them in 2D rather than 3D which makes determining the real relationship between these in space difficult to determine. For some insight as to what is happening here I will refer you to the article and great image taken by the Gemini South telescope with nearly 6 times the resolution I can achieve here. I wish now I'd have taken some H alpha data with this as both galaxies are rich in HII regions as shown by the Gemini South image. http://www.gemini.edu/twinspiral

Arp classed the pair under "Group character: connected arms". His comment reads: "Arm's linked. Note bifurcation in arm of N spiral." NGC 5426 is classed by NED as SAc pec. while NGC 5427 is classed as SAc pec. Sy2. The latter meaning it is a Seyfert 2 galaxy with an active nucleus. I find no consensus on their distance. Red shift puts them a bit over 130 million light-years away but various papers I've seen put them closer, more like 90 to 110 million light-years. The ability of Gemini south to resolve so many HII regions would argue for these somewhat closer distances.

While there are a lot of faint fuzzies in the image, most are cataloged under the LCRS catalog, that stands for Las Campanas Redshift Survey. Oddly, the nice big bright entries have no red shift value in NED. For instance the large orange elliptical NW of Arp 271 is very obvious. It is cataloged as LCRS B140024.4-054536 without a red shift. Most that do carry a red shift are the tiny yellowish orange galaxies. Those fall into two camps, those near Arp 271 are about 1.1 billion light-years distant and those in the SW corner belong to a different group being 1.7 billion light-years distant. But the larger, likely closer galaxies have no red shift data that I could find.

In my north up image the lower galaxy seems to my brain to be nearly face on but in the Gemini image it is quite tilted. So I rotated my image for east up and suddenly it looked very 3D and tilted. I've attached a cropped rotated version. Is it just me or does it seem to appear to change orientation for you as well?

Arp's image of the pair with the 200" Palomar scope is at:
http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level...ig_arp271.jpeg

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10 RGB=2x10, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

I originally attached the wrong images, I've replaced them with the "correct" version.

Rick
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ARP271L4X10RGB2X10r2-8.jpg (130.3 KB, 31 views)
File Type: jpg ARP271L4X10RGB2X10r2-CROP_EAST_UP.jpg (74.2 KB, 42 views)

Last edited by RickJ; 02-September-2009 at 03:30 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-September-2009, 11:38 PM
Glom's Avatar
Glom Glom is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: West London, England
Posts: 8,424
Send a message via MSN to Glom
Default

The dustiness of the join area of NGC 5427. Why does it go all dusty?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-September-2009, 12:53 AM
jniemann jniemann is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 221
Default

Very nice Rick. Yours compares very favorably with the Gemini photo, although the latter obviously brings out the HII regions more.

I agree that the rotated version looks more '3d' - not sure why.

Cheers,
Judd
__________________
Snert, and the whole world snerts with you.
Snarg, and you snarg alone ...
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-September-2009, 01:17 AM
Tinaa Tinaa is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Texas USA
Posts: 3,799
Default

This has got to be one of my favorites! Beautiful.
__________________
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-September-2009, 10:25 PM
Spirit's Avatar
Spirit Spirit is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ireland
Posts: 81
Default

Brilliant stuff Rick.

Thanks for posting.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-September-2009, 02:37 AM
RickJ's Avatar
RickJ RickJ is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mantrap Lake, MN
Posts: 1,628
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glom View Post
The dustiness of the join area of NGC 5427. Why does it go all dusty?
I don't see the dust your refer to. I see dust running down the center of its arms near the core but it isn't all that well seen when you get out to the overlap region. They aren't in contact as yet but likely will be in a few hundred million years as they orbit around each other creating tidal distortions. The darker areas aren't so much dust but lack of bright, hot, new stars so appear darker. Dust usually gives a reddish color when seen in conditions like seen here. There are likely lots of stars in the apparent voids, its just that they are more normal stars like the sun or weaker and thus not easily seen at the concentrations of stars in spiral arms.

Rick
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Iridium 33 Cosmos 2251 Collision Not An Accident! Gsquare Conspiracy Theories 285 04-March-2009 05:10 PM
Images, Video, Interactive Tools Provides Insight into Satellite Collision Fraser Universe Today Story Comments 0 12-February-2009 09:50 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today