Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Astrophotography
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-September-2009, 08:49 PM
RickJ's Avatar
RickJ RickJ is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mantrap Lake, MN
Posts: 1,627
Default Arp 250 For Arp galaxy lovers only

A few Arp galaxies are very photogenic, Arp 85 (M51) for instance, most are at best interesting. Then there are those so far away or so small they are the photographic duds. Unfortunately Arp 250 falls into this category, in this case because it is so very small yet could be two colliding small galaxies.

While there are two galaxies here only the one to the west is considered to be Arp 250 which he classed by Arp under Galaxies (not classifiable as S or E): Appearance of fission. It does indeed appear to be a galaxy that has been cut in half right through the core. Or else it is two one spirals about to collide. It is only about 70 million light-years distant, two and a half times closer than Haro 1 in the lower left corner. It is a rather small galaxy. The only catalog entry for it's "companion" to the east is in the PGC where it is listed as #2063674 at magnitude 17.5. My image is poor but it appears distorted so may be involved. There's just not enough information to know. In all there's a dearth of data here. I figured its odd double nature should have generated some papers but I found none. Heck, Arp apparently didn't have anything to say on this one. At least I couldn't find any comment from him on it. Nor any by anyone else other than a visual sighting with a 25" scope.

Little information is available on anything in the image. The very blue tiny galaxy west (right) of Arp 250 is HS 0732+3529 at the same distance, 180 million light-years as Haro 1. HS stands for Hamburg/ESO QSO Survey. Apparently it looked for compact blue objects as likely QSO candidates and found this galaxy in the process. NED lists no other catalog entry for it.

There's another very blue galaxy SE of Arp 250. Appears to be a spiral. Oddly no catalog I checked includes it. Is it too at 180 million light-years? I have no idea. I can't even give it a catalog entry.

Galaxy in Southeast corner is Haro 1/NGC 2415 classed by NED as possibly an irregular Magellanic galaxy. Red shift indicates a distance of about 180 million light-years. Seems large for a dwarf and while the spiral structure is distorted I don't see it as an irregular galaxy. Haro galaxies are blue with emission lines. It is thought paired with one or two other galaxies described as 22 minutes north which puts them out of my FOV. Only candidate out of my field I can locate is UGC UGC 03937 but it is 23 minutes NNE with a red shift distance of 190 million light-years. HS 0732+3529 is only about 17.4' away so doesn't seem to fit though its distance and very blue color would seem to say otherwise. Only catalog entry anyplace for the one (or is it two) blue galaxies just to the west of Haro 1 is PGC 213406 with little other information. I see a wisp of stars below it but not quite connected to it. No nucleus to it. So is it a tidal arm pulled from this galaxy or another galaxy entirely, just one with no defined core? One reason Haro 1 looks distorted is there are three stars superimposed on its arm structure making them look more distorted than they really are. You have to look closely to see them. I wouldn't have noticed them except for one paper that mentioned them.

Haro 1 seems to have confused the keepers of the Hubble data archive. I checked the archive to see if Hubble had imaged Arp 250. I was happy to see two images. At least I'd have a black and white image. Nope. It was Haro 1. So I tried other catalog names for Arp 250. All brought me back to Haro 1 -- oops. So I tried Haro 1 and got a lot of images of it, none the two filed under Arp 250. Interestingly the mono image labeled Arp 250 was the best data. I then took color filter data from Haro 1 data and made the attached Hubble image of Haro 1. It's a tad better than mine. Though is it a billion dollars better? Hmmm.

Just off the bottom left edge of the image is the galaxy cluster, ABELL 0590. There is a possible QSO just on my image. It is only 2.5 million light-years away. NED says it is galaxy, SIMBAD says QSO. In my image it appears to be a very orange galaxy right along the lower left edge of my image, NE of Haro 1 so I have to vote for the galaxy designation. Likely one with a very active nucleus.

ARP's image shows a hint that it may indeed be two galaxies each with long drawn out arms that overlap such that only two are seen.
http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level...ig_arp250.jpeg

14" LX200R @ F/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10'x3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Image with less compression:
http://www.spacebanter.com/attachmen...tid=2602&stc=1

Rick
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ARP250L4X10rgb2x10x3r-7.jpg (138.5 KB, 35 views)
File Type: jpg ARP250OOPS_C.jpg (33.7 KB, 35 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-September-2009, 05:56 PM
Glom's Avatar
Glom Glom is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: West London, England
Posts: 8,420
Send a message via MSN to Glom
Default

Looks small in the image, but prettier than you suggested.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Arp 336: Spectacular polar ring galaxy RickJ Astrophotography 8 31-May-2009 01:17 AM
Arp 134 -- A well known bright galaxy RickJ Astrophotography 4 08-May-2009 03:23 AM
Arp 98, another for Arp galaxy lovers only RickJ Astrophotography 1 09-April-2009 01:38 AM
Slooh Musashi Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories 107 25-July-2005 01:10 AM
Mistakes in Astronomy snowflakeuniverse Against the Mainstream 128 13-November-2003 10:03 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today