If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Bad Astronomy > Bad Astronomy: The Book
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-October-2005, 01:44 PM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 7,481
Default Well, Well: The Difficulty of Daylight Star Sighting

I thought we'd talked about this section (Well, Well: The Difficulty of Daylight Star Sighting, p.103-110 in Bad Astronomy) of the book, but a couple of searches of the forum Bad Astronomy: The Book with "magnitude" or "daylight" or "daytime" didn't turn up anything.

The BA says (p.107) "They determined that if you can cut out all but a tiny fraction of the sky, you can actually see stars that are about 10 times brighter[?] than if seen in the whole sky--in which case it's just possible to see Sirius during the day, but that's it. The next brightest star, Canopus, is on the borderline of detectability. Let's be generous and say that both stars can be seen this way."

The "way" that is being discussed is like from the bottom of a narrow chimney, for instance. However, in this recent thread, a couple of posters make contrary claims. Dimmer stars were visible without resorting to light cutouts. Anybody else have any experience with this?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-November-2005, 08:21 PM
ngc3314's Avatar
ngc3314 ngc3314 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 87.5W 33.2N
Posts: 1,365
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hhEb09'1
I thought we'd talked about this section (Well, Well: The Difficulty of Daylight Star Sighting, p.103-110 in Bad Astronomy) of the book, but a couple of searches of the forum Bad Astronomy: The Book with "magnitude" or "daylight" or "daytime" didn't turn up anything.

The BA says (p.107) "They determined that if you can cut out all but a tiny fraction of the sky, you can actually see stars that are about 10 times brighter[?] than if seen in the whole sky--in which case it's just possible to see Sirius during the day, but that's it. The next brightest star, Canopus, is on the borderline of detectability. Let's be generous and say that both stars can be seen this way."

The "way" that is being discussed is like from the bottom of a narrow chimney, for instance. However, in this recent thread, a couple of posters make contrary claims. Dimmer stars were visible without resorting to light cutouts. Anybody else have any experience with this?
I'm one of the contrarians, so maybe I should be disqualified - but the claim being made in the other thread was that from very clear locations, with unusually clean skies, experienced observers who have carefully worked out just where to look can on rare occasions just make out stars as faint as magnitude 0 with the sun (sometimes just slightly) above the horizon. I'm not sure that should be seen as a refutation of "unprepared observers at the bottom of a well would not see stars overhead". If nothing else, there are only about half a dozen such stars (and five planets that would occasionally make it, although Mercury is really too close to the Sun in our sky when that bright and Mars has to be near opposition with very limited daytime visibility). The odds of one of these bright objects being in the right place (on top of to omuch dark adaptation, etc.) are really small.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-November-2005, 04:59 PM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 7,481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ngc3314
I'm not sure that should be seen as a refutation of "unprepared observers at the bottom of a well would not see stars overhead".
But it appears that the BA was discussing prepared and knowledgeable observers.

I'd still like to hear particular personal incidents, if anyone has any.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 17-October-2007, 04:36 AM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 7,481
Default

Any takers?

We've had some more discussions about this, right?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today