Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Bad Astronomy > Bad Astronomy: The Book
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 09-December-2002, 07:40 PM
Wiley Wiley is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 899
Default

If y'all want to include "maybe", we're gonna need to move to trinary. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 09-December-2002, 09:10 PM
Donnie B.'s Avatar
Donnie B. Donnie B. is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 5,227
Default

No, just a 2-bit field.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2002, 01:12 AM
ljbrs ljbrs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 679
Default

I had almost forgotten about this thread that I started. Great posts, folks! I still think that SI units are the way to go. If somebody does not want to learn SI units, he or she (she or he?) should stay far away from the sciences.

===================

Quote:
I like English measurements. It's not that I wasn't taught Metric or I don't know how to convert. I just like them the way they are.
Of course, English measurements are kind of cute (quaint), but they do not have much scientific utility.

ljbrs [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_frown.gif[/img] [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_frown.gif[/img]
__________________
"There is in the universe neither center nor circumference." Giordano Bruno Born 1548. Torched 1600.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2002, 01:33 AM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is online now
Vulcan Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,224
Default

Quote:
On 2002-12-08 19:44, Wiley wrote:
I may be doing too much computer programming these days, but I'm gonna have to vote for binary. It's as simple as buttoning your shoe. What do y'all think? Yes or no?
How about octal as a compromise?
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2002, 05:33 AM
Senor Molinero Senor Molinero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Townsville, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 308
Default

I always enjoyed doing the double conversion for the price of gold from $US/USoz to local currency per kilogram.
God bless the USA.
__________________
Does earth plug a hole in Heaven or Heaven plug a hole in Earth? -Peter Gabriel
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2002, 10:24 AM
Kaptain K's Avatar
Kaptain K Kaptain K is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elgin, Tx
Posts: 7,568
Default

Quote:
On 2002-12-18 01:33, Senor Molinero wrote:
I always enjoyed doing the double conversion for the price of gold from $US/USoz to local currency per kilogram.
God bless the USA.
Yeahbut!

Gold is not priced in $US/USoz. It is priced in $US/troy oz.
__________________
Any day you wake up on "the right side of the dirt" is a good day.

T. Anderson
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2002, 01:28 PM
SeanF's Avatar
SeanF SeanF is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 5,205
Default

Quote:
On 2002-12-18 06:24, Kaptain K wrote:
Quote:
On 2002-12-18 01:33, Senor Molinero wrote:
I always enjoyed doing the double conversion for the price of gold from $US/USoz to local currency per kilogram.
God bless the USA.
Yeahbut!

Gold is not priced in $US/USoz. It is priced in $US/troy oz.
Yep! Hence the correct answer to "What weighs more, a pound of gold or a pound of feathers?" is, in fact, the pound of feathers . . . [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]

__________________
SeanF

"Ask to understand, but don't challenge unless you have the knowledge."--NEOWatcher

The contents of this post are ©2008 by SeanF and may not be copied or retransmitted in any form without the express written consent of SeanF
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2002, 01:53 PM
David Hall David Hall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 2,689
Default

But I'd rather have the pound of gold. You can keep the feathers. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]
__________________
...And that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be banana-shaped. --Sir Bedevere
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2002, 02:16 PM
GrapesOfWrath's Avatar
GrapesOfWrath GrapesOfWrath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 3,019
Default

Quote:
On 2002-12-18 09:28, SeanF wrote:
Hence the correct answer to "What weighs more, a pound of gold or a pound of feathers?" is, in fact, the pound of feathers
Yahbut, an ounce of gold is heavier than an ounce of feathers...
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2002, 10:20 PM
Senor Molinero Senor Molinero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Townsville, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 308
Default

TROY OUNCES. Consarn it!! Any wonder I'm broke. Another conspiracy.
__________________
Does earth plug a hole in Heaven or Heaven plug a hole in Earth? -Peter Gabriel
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 24-December-2002, 02:04 AM
Kizarvexis Kizarvexis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Riverview, FL
Posts: 582
Default

Quote:
On 2002-04-11 10:39, The Bad Astronomer wrote:
I prefer metric, though I still think in miles. It's impossible to use metric in daily life still, but I try to squeeze it in when I can. In interviews, I always try to use both.
I agree that in the US it is hard to use metric, since almost everything is either in standard US measurement only or in both systems, but the metric in small print. I do have a quirk though. I estimate distance in meters, since that is how I was taught in the U.S. Army Infantry. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img] In everything else, I use the US system.

Kizarvexis
I also use the 24 hour clock and this annoys my wife. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img] The kids are learning the 24 hour clock though. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 24-December-2002, 03:03 AM
Rodina Rodina is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 234
Default

Quote:
On 2002-12-18 10:16, GrapesOfWrath wrote:
Quote:
On 2002-12-18 09:28, SeanF wrote:
Hence the correct answer to "What weighs more, a pound of gold or a pound of feathers?" is, in fact, the pound of feathers
Yahbut, an ounce of gold is heavier than an ounce of feathers...
How about that - a troy pound = 1.215 standard pounds.

By the way, all of you measurement nuts should get yourselves a copy of "Measure for Measure" by Young and Glover, a handy little pocket book which covers standard, English and all kinds of measurements from antiquity. If you want to know that there are 0.158 scruples in a carat, this is where you find it.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...glance&s=books
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 24-December-2002, 07:15 AM
cable cable is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 556
Default

on airplanes, it's "english", xcept russians who use metric.
and that may explain why soooo many accidents with russian planes: pilots got confused.
unless it's reliablity ? [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 24-December-2002, 09:20 AM
GrapesOfWrath's Avatar
GrapesOfWrath GrapesOfWrath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 3,019
Default

Quote:
On 2002-12-23 23:03, Rodina wrote:How about that - a troy pound = 1.215 standard pounds.
No, a standard pound = 1.215 troy pounds.

And a standard ounce = .9115 troy ounce.
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 24-December-2002, 02:30 PM
Chuck Chuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Valley of The Sun
Posts: 1,823
Send a message via AIM to Chuck
Default

The Metric System can be useful. I use it when I want to be annoying. Like when someone asks me how tall I am or how much I weigh when it's really none of their business.

__________________
Life is like a box of chocolates. All of your choices are bad for you.
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 29-December-2002, 07:37 AM
xriso xriso is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 54N, 123W = Prince George, BC
Posts: 314
Default

About the bases... I wonder what's so great about base 60? I personally like to write my numbers with one symbol per digit. As he was saying, people like to divide things into halves, thirds, quarters. So why not take the least common multiple of 2,3,4? It's 12 (2*2*3), only 2 more symbols needed. I myself wouldn't mind doing away with a 5 factor, if it meant having base 12 rather than 60.
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 29-December-2002, 02:50 PM
GrapesOfWrath's Avatar
GrapesOfWrath GrapesOfWrath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 3,019
Default

But divisions into five have been the basis of our number system for so long...it'd be a shame to quit now. Just my two cents.
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 01-January-2003, 02:04 AM
Donnie B.'s Avatar
Donnie B. Donnie B. is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 5,227
Default

You can use base 60 and still have only one symbol per digit. You just need to memorize a whole lot of numerals. But it would still be a lot simpler than, say, Chinese writing, which has several thousand characters in common use.

Of course, those of us who write real software (in Assembly) know that the only truly useful number system is hexadecimal.
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 01-January-2003, 11:18 PM
Senor Molinero Senor Molinero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Townsville, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 308
Default

There are 10 types of people in this world.
Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________
Does earth plug a hole in Heaven or Heaven plug a hole in Earth? -Peter Gabriel
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 14-March-2003, 07:28 PM
Autarch Autarch is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Dublin, Irelnad
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
On 2002-12-08 19:44, Wiley wrote:
I may be doing too much computer programming these days, but I'm gonna have to vote for binary. It's as simple as buttoning your shoe. What do y'all think? Yes or no?
Some even advocate balanced ternary...[img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 15-March-2003, 04:35 AM
frenat frenat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Robins AFB, GA
Posts: 819
Default

Quote:
on airplanes, it's "english", xcept russians who use metric.
Yeah airplanes use english units excepts the airspeed is in knots and not mph and distance is in nautical miles and standard miles depending on where you look. Of course some planes also measure airspeed with a mach meter as well.

__________________
"Eternal vigilance is the price of supremacy"
------------Mark Twain

"Women are like Voltron. The more you can hook up, the better it gets."
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 19-April-2003, 12:55 AM
poorleno poorleno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: .se
Posts: 152
Send a message via ICQ to poorleno Send a message via MSN to poorleno