Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Bad Astronomy > Bad Astronomy: The Books
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 22-March-2002, 11:18 PM
Brian K Brian K is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Posts: 2
Default

Out of all the people out here that need to read the book and hear the message, maybe the most important are all the amateur astronomers. So...the BA needs to take to the road and visit all the amateur astronomy clubs and star parties this spring and summer.

Some (a minority) of the people I meet at these meetings figure that nothing is true unless it was mentioned and approved by Art Bell. And these are the same people sharing astronomy at public star parties.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 28-March-2002, 10:12 PM
jewel jewel is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Centreville, VA
Posts: 9
Default

Sadly, I think I met just one of those folks when I was recently in Arizona on vacation. She was a very nice lady and quite lively. But she was also very very untrusting (kind of hostile, actually) of science and it's methods. And she was the staff star guide!

She admitted she wasn't a scientist and wasn't all that familiar with a lot of science, but she certainly did not hesitate to criticize what she did not understand. She says she loves to tell people (while professional astronomers are answering questions about our current theories as to how the universe works)that scientists don't really 'know anything' and that everything is 'just a theory'. It was obvious by talking to her she did not have even a basic understanding of science. It's sad, really.

I realize science isn't perfect, but it is the best vehicle we have when it comes to discovering how we work and how the universe works, et al.

I was in such shock at some of the things she spouted I couldn't say a word. If I would have had my copy of "Bad Astronomy" I think I would have given it to her to read. In fact, I might just have to send her a copy.

Luckily, a couple nights earlier our star guide was a real live professional astronomer. A very intelligent, rational fellow.



Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 28-March-2002, 11:14 PM
The Bad Astronomer's Avatar
The Bad Astronomer The Bad Astronomer is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Posts: 8,646
Default

Well, I'll be spending Astronomy Day in Nashville, talking to people about the Moon hoax and other Bad topics. I've been to a few local astronomy clubs. The problem is time and money. It can cost me a lot in both time (I usually wind up taking vacation time) and money to go and give talks, so I have to ask for an honorarium, which few clubs can afford. I love giving talks, but it can be difficult.

But check out my calendar. I do get around a little. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 29-March-2002, 01:40 AM
Hale_Bopp Hale_Bopp is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 622
Default

I'll be at astronomy day at Peck Farm Park in the Fox Valley giving a talk at 1pm on the science of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Anyone in the western burbs of Chicago can check it out.

It bugs me when someone says, "It's just a theory". A theory has substantial evidence backing it up from repeated experiments. I think it comes from bad murder mysteries where the detective says, "I have a theory..." which invariably turns out to be wrong.

So, you might point out that when someone says, "It's just a theory" they are really saying "It's just an idea that has a lot of evidence from reproducable experiments backing it up."

Instead of the Big Bang Theory, I prefer to use the term model. I think it is actually a more accurate term and less likely to be misunderstood. Granted, people might not know what we mean by a model, but that's okay. That's a teachable moment as we say in the ed biz [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 29-March-2002, 07:28 PM
BADad BADad is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Alan
Posts: 19
Default

I (tentatively) agree with Hale_Bopp. Maybe "Model" is a better term than "Theory", but it is not likely to take hold. The Evolutionists have the same problem. By calling it the "Theory of Evolution", many nay-sayers do indeed remark, "but, its only a Theory!". Let me quote from Carl Zimmer's "Evolution - The Triumph of an Idea" in his Introduction.

"The task of Science is two-fold: to determine, as best we can, the empirical character of the natural world (ED: Universe?); and to ascertain why our world operates as it does, rather than in some other conceivable, but unrealized way....."

"Science,.... , cannot establish absolute truth; thus our conclusions must always remain tentative"

But, by using the term "Theory" does, again, not necessarily IMPLY tentativity, in any immediate sense. In fact, one can deal with the FACT of evolution.

At least in the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century, we have not overthrown the "theory" of relativity. There is much evidence that it is FACT. However, we can't be too smug or impatient. The combination of relativity with quantum theory (sic) may be imminent .
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 29-March-2002, 08:07 PM
ljbrs ljbrs is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 679
Default

My astronomy group has a great many members who are well educated in real astronomy. We have some great lecturers who speak to the group at our monthly meetings (many from graduate studies at the university and some who are professors and instructors there). I feel right at home there and spend a lot of time with them in various astronomy pursuits. I have been an officer of the club and am on their board (for life) because of my taking on jobs which nobody else wants to do but which I believe are necessary.

If you are lucky enough to find such a club, rest assured that they do exist. They are often located around universities where astronomy is taught at least at the undergraduate level.

A lot of first-class astronomers have attended and received astronomy degrees from that university. I received my degrees from another good *State* university.

I just love being a member of that astronomy club.

ljbrs
__________________
"There is in the universe neither center nor circumference." Giordano Bruno Born 1548. Torched 1600.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 29-March-2002, 08:21 PM
Hale_Bopp Hale_Bopp is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 622
Default

I see you are in Michigan...by any chance did we both go to the other *State* University [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]

Rob

Go Spartans!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 30-March-2002, 12:42 AM
ljbrs ljbrs is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 679
Default

No, MSU was far too far away at the time for me to commute. I would have loved attending MSU.

WSU is where I received my degrees and its nearness made it possible for me to commute from Grosse Pointe Farms where I lived at that time. I wanted to get my degrees from a university and my parents did not want me living in one (you know, the dangers for their daughter in a big naughty-bad place)... Very silly. However, I always took my education to be my own responsibility and worked very, very hard. I took 25 semester hours every semester (requiring advisers' signatures for permission) in order to graduate earlier and begin working on my M.A. which I also received at WSU.

I have read about astronomy and physics on my own. Avidly. I think it is important to be constantly learning. It is great for the maintenance of the mind.

ljbrs [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif[/img] [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img] [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img]
__________________
"There is in the universe neither center nor circumference." Giordano Bruno Born 1548. Torched 1600.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 06:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today