If you've seen it, review, please, the movie Knowing (IMDB page) . The protagonist, played by Nicolas Cage, is an MIT astrophysicist -- who gets into numerology as a predictor of bad events.

So, I'm not eager to see it, but I'm happy to hear people tear it apart. Several reviews I've seen/heard so far have been pretty rough on it, so that's good.

__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...

Graham doesn't want to see it, and he likes the National Treasure movies! I think I'd almost rather see Angels and Demons.

__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

I LOVE National Treasure, but I'm the sort of person who likes movies for plot, not actors, so I don't think I'll be seeing this.

__________________
I want to go back to the moon.
I don't care which rocket you use, whichever one you pick, I'll like it, I swear.
"If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis
Rovers forever! - ToSeek

This looks bad ... but I don't understand why an astrophysicist is necessary to be the one to decode those numbers.

__________________

"Why do something now when you can put it off 'til later?" -- me :)

I'm a Proyas fan (See The Crow, Dark City for a flash of brilliance). But I think Cage is... well at the very least not worth the movies he's in. I may see it on DVD.

__________________
---"Why do things have to suck so bad?" a friend once asked me.
"Because space is a vacuum and that's a lot of suck." I replied.
(Actual quote)---

LA Times: 'Knowing' is No. 1 at box office. Who knew?

Bah.

__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...

Give it a week. Most of the reviews I've seen are very negative. I doubt it has staying power.

__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser

It's not exactly as though March is prime movie release time, either.

__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

25% on the Tomatometer:

"Critics' Consensus: It's weighted down by its absurd plot and over-seriousness."

ETA: 14% for the 'top critics'.

That's a little better than the Day the Earth Stood Still remake (another bad movie) . . . but not much.

__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser

Guys: I had a chance to watch this jewel on my Sat Dish.....I am surprised that no one here has pointed out that this an example of the hoariest cliche in Sci Fi....All that improbable baloney just see "Adam and Eve" headed for the "Ygdrassil", and I wonder, one set of Rabbits turned loose like that, in 2 years the planet is a mass of rabbits---didn't the Aliens (wearing the Sting suit from Dune) have any predators to plant there??? It was totally over hyped and not worth the trouble.....

What was in the cockpit of the airliner that blew up twice?? Who is their aviation advisor??

Why do they keep remaking the same episode of Twilight Zone....???

Dale in B'ham

__________________
"Ad astra per aspera"

Angels and Demons was Bad Science and Bad Religion but still an entertaining movie.

__________________
-----
Todd (Bowie, MD, US, North America, Earth, Sol System, Vega region, Local Bubble, Orion arm, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Virgo A Cluster, Virgo supercluster, the universe in which spock is clean shaven)

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

personal page: http://blog.astrosketches.info

I just saw that concoction for free in the library.
Oh dear - the movie attempted to explain ETis with religion and vice versa - Daeniken would like it.
The important philosophical topic of determinism vs. non-determinism was touched but badly handled in the main character's lecture - you can always use emotional problems of a character as an excuse to not duly address a difficult topic.
And then the Woo-woo (I call it a Plait alert):
They depicted the solar system on a computer screen with the sun and planets to scale but not their distances which made it look possible that a huge solar flare/solar event could cause overwhelming destruction - massive blast wave and all.
It couldn't - maybe a close by GRB could (again, fire yes, but without a blast wave).
Still, some good eye candy towards the end - but this movie IMO did an unsuccessful attempt at uniting science and religion and overall has preaching overtones.
The end is kitsch-as-kitsch-can, must be inspired by those sect-pamphlets that various zealots distribute, with a dollop of teletubbyland - and the rabbits the kids brought are probably at the top of the food chain, so expect more teletubby scenery in the future.
"Man merkt die Absicht und ist verstimmt" (Goethe). ("One sees the intention and is angered").

__________________
Mars Society.

when is the last time the masses wanted fact over truth? lol.

Watched the dvd, not much to like here. Some drama early on and as a frequent flyer - didn't really enjoy the graphic nature of the plane crash (would have been pulverized anyway - not left with folks hanging out of their seats, etc.) but the ending was really a shame...could see it coming a mile off - the omnipresent aliens saving the day for us misguided earthlings again...

__________________
Scope: Orion SkyView Pro, Mak-Cas 150MM Telescope

The scene late in the movie where Cage talks about superflares and G type stars brought back a memory. IIRC, several years ago I read about a G type main sequence star that suddenly brightened by about 2 mag. and then returned to normal after a few hours. But, I can't find anything like that on the internet. Anyone here ever hear about such an observation? Or maybe its just a bad memory.

__________________
I'm not a scientist, but I play one on the internet.
http://www.rrac.org

It was a depressing movie. Too dark. I give it a thumbs down. Two hours of same old SF cliches.

Maybe you're talking about this GALEX discovery?

http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&id=3227

If not, try googling "superflare"

It was my understanding that something like this would be probable from our Star as it's not spinning/churning fast enough to create the magnetic loops required to cause such a massive solar flare. Does it not require a fast churning to develop a super flare such as portrayed in the movie?

__________________
Science may set limits to knowledge, but should not set limits to imagination.
Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970)

Ooooo, I think I thought a thought. Ooo I did, I did, I did think a thought.

I heard that some of the movie was filmed in Melbourne, so there is an Australian connection.

I watched this movie over the weekend. Bad as it was, scientifically, I liked it more than I thought I would. I would point out that they did clearly show multiple ships both leaving Earth and landing on the other planet. The implication being that more than 2 kids and 2 bunnies were deposited there. For all we know, some ships might have had a bunch of plants, some might have a bunch of animals, and some might have a bunch of people. Even if all ships had 2 people and 2 animals (of complimentary genders), we don't know how many ships there were.

I also don't think it was fundamentally important that Cage's character was an astrophysicist. His knowledge in that area certainly doesn't change anything.

The hardest thing for me to swallow, within the bounds of the film, was why give this little girl predictions of select disasters coming over 50 years? It served no purpose other than some horrible imagery of the plane crash and subway mayhem. Why not just make a cryptic final prediction?

I will also note that this movie should have been rated R, in my opinion. Even if somewhat inaccurate, the plane crash and subway crash scenes were very traumatic and vivid. I still feel uncomfortable thinking about them.

CJSF

__________________
Two years ago moved from my town
I was looking up past the city lights
But the city lights got in my way

See the constellation ride across the sky
No cigar, no lady on his arm
Just a guy made of dots and lines

-from "See The Constellation"
by They Might Be Giants

Didn't you know? The MPAA thinks violence isn't all that damaging to young psyches.

__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

But any hint of the s-thing and they go nonononono!

__________________
‘To those who regard “crime fiction” as some sacred icon which must follow a rigid formula, I will always be the man who writes 18-syllable haiku.’Trying to make sense of computers, The Error Log.

That's a point. Then too, where your teenage daughter can watch a bunch of Paris Hilton wannabes and emulate their behavior, it is harder for your young son to be Gork, who ate New York. The sad fact is that life-forms learned how to eat-- how to kill--before they learned how to make love. If someone "says your money or your life" (yes, I'm thinking it over), that hostility is very honest.

It reminds me of the line from Zardoz where an immortal waiting to be punished quits making false explanations, and finally admits "I hate you all." One of his judge/fellows is impressed and speaks into his vote-ring the words "absolute aquittal" finding the honesty refreshing...

If someone says they love you--do you really know what they want? Sometimes it is easy be be lost in the ...larger personality of another. Perhaps that goes to explain some of the ratings. Who can say?

Bluntly, no. I can say. The fact is, the MPAA ratings board is well known to be older people, almost none of whom have school-aged children despite the MPAA's constant statements that you have to in order to make the ratings board. Heck, the whole idea of a ratings system in the first place was created because people were upset with raciness in movies. It doesn't take nudity or graphic content to make the MPAA give it a higher rating. It really takes very little research to find out this sort of thing. If you want to get the history, look up "League of Decency," "Joe Breen," or "William H. Hays."

__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"