Watching it on Sci-Fi Channel. If you have seen it its not bad as a story, a bit better than many stories. It does go a bit far though with some strange assumptions.

WARNING SPOILER:

Story is about a meteor shower that is the best display in years. Suddenly, in amongst the thousands of objects being tracked, one is spotted that is heading straight for the moon, not very big, but interesting non the less..

It impacts, making massive damage. Some debris is thrown towards the Earth, impacting several hours later.

Everyone feels lucky because after a few days everything seems to calm down, apart from some odd weather artefacts. Except that one scientist discovers a part of the debris from the moon in a very unrealistic crater. It turns out to be a bit of a brown dwarf, and immensely dense.

They run calculations and the asteroid that struck the moon had a mass twice that of the Earth, it is now part of the moon. The two objects are pulling each other together and the Earth is getting wilder by the day.

Part 2 is on Next week. If you've seen it don't tell me how it finishes. If you haven't seen it I apologise for the spoiler.

__________________
"If you've made it to retirement without being blamed for a major disaster, you've failed as an engineer."

So now we're orbiting the Moon?

__________________

Well you would have thought so, but apparently not, the moon is simply spiralling closer and closer to the Earth. Tides were affected first so at least the sudden huge mass increase was reflected in that aspect.

After the impact they said the Moons orbit was closer but had stabilised. When they realised the impact was from a brown dwarf some days later, they said they should check the Moons orbit again, as no had done so since the impact, as if. They said it was even closer but had stabilised again, then it suddenly started getting closer again, then it once more stabilised. Newton was turning in his grave.

Also the Earth experienced a huge increase in magnetic activity. The part that impacted the Earth (no bigger than your fist) displayed an enormous magnetic field. It was lifted by a crane whose SWL was probably about 50 Tons. But they used webbing which has a SWL of only about 5 Tons.

How heavy would a fist size piece of brown dwarf be ? millions of Tons I would think.

Made me laugh that the piece that hit the Earth despite it arriving from the moon in only a few hours at immense speeds and being so dense made an impact crater only about 10Ft deep. Woops.

__________________
"If you've made it to retirement without being blamed for a major disaster, you've failed as an engineer."

Did they actually say "brown dwarf", or did they say "white dwarf"?
White dwarf stars are famous for their enormous density. Brown dwarfs
are not.

Of course, in either case -- white dwarf or brown -- the density is due to
the enormous mass of the body. If a small chunk of the body were flung
off into space, it would immediately expand, becoming less dense.

On the other hand, back in 1985 I wrote a page explaining Star Trek's
dilithium crystals, in whch I had them originating in white dwarf stars
which subsequently exploded. The unusual combination of conditions
which allowed dilithium to be created and then spewed out into space
made it very rare. At that time the properties of dilithium had not yet
been defined in the TV series, so I defined them, and mine were much
superior to those put forward in ST-TNG. I had the dilithium be part
of the sensor system, required to navigate space at warp speeds.
Without dilithium, warp travel was essentially blind. You could only
see something in your path ahead of you when you hit it. Deflector
shields could not extend forward from the ship at warp speeds without
dilithium. A problem with dilithium was that it weakened every time
it was moved at warp speeds. The higher the warp facter, the greater
the damage. A crystal could only stand one or two excursions to warp
nine or above, before it was ruined. And it was useless to store spares.
Every crystal on the ship was affected by warp speed, whether it was
in use at the time or not.

Sorry I went off-topic already.

-- Jeff, in Minneapolis

__________________
http://www.FreeMars.org/jeff/

"I find astronomy very interesting, but I wouldn't if I thought we
were just going to sit here and look." -- "Van Rijn"

"The other planets? Well, they just happen to be there, but the
point of rockets is to explore them!" -- Kai Yeves

I too watched Impact. I found it surprisingly enjoyable, not least because it gave the impression that characters were being affected around the world. A lot of the action was represented by short illustrative sequences and quite a lot of talk about what's going on offstage and beyond the budget - a bit like a Greek play.

I also liked the fact that, although the science is largely a load of horses' hooves, the writer clearly knows some science, and is grounding the nonsense science on the reasonably good science. Unlike, say, most of new Doctor Who which gets it absolutely wrong from start to finish.

__________________
Nothing beautiful was ever made from gravel.

Wanted to wait until you commented on it before I mentioned the reviews I had read. Was the acting worth watching, even if the science went a bit out there later on?

I like the premise, that something so familiar to us becomes a threat. Not sure why they had to use "brown dwarf" material though, just have the moon shield us from a very large threat, but in doing so become one itself. Then they could have turned to a more "When Worlds Collide" scenario.

Although WWC had a place to escape, that would have to be written in somehow too...

The piece that stuck in the moon had a mass twice that of the Earth? The Earth is 80 times the mass of the moon, so the tides on Earth would suddenly increase 160 times. Coastal cities would be completely inundated, right?

Not necessarily. I think the direct effect of the Moon's gravity on
Earth's oceans is a bulge only a couple of inches high. (A search,
even just on BAUT, would probably turn up the exact figure, but I'm
not very good at searches and, more important, I'm extremely lazy.)
The large tides along the coasts are due to that couple of inches
of water piling up on the continental shelves (shelfs?) as it moves
toward the shores. It might pile up 160 times what we have now,
or it might pile up more or less than that. I suspect it would be less.

In any case, the length of the month would fall to less than six days,
I'm pretty sure, and Earth would definitely orbit the Moon, nomatter
what Ken says about relative motion or what anybody says about the
location of the barycenter!

However, if a small body with a mass twice that of Earth struck the
Moon, unless it was a black hole, it is made of a form of matter for
which there is no hint of a suggestion that it exists.

If it is a black hole, it should pass right through the Moon and go out
the other side, but seriously altering the Moon's orbit around Earth.

If it is a black hole and doesn't pass right through, but gets stuck
inside the Moon, then I think the Moon would be consumed in as little
as a few hours. Except for the small explosion at the entry point,
the Moon might look normal for the first few hours, then parts of the
surface would begin to cave in, and suddenly the whole Moon would
implode and vanish. There wouldn't even be a cloud of dust.

-- Jeff, in Minneapolis

__________________
http://www.FreeMars.org/jeff/

"I find astronomy very interesting, but I wouldn't if I thought we
were just going to sit here and look." -- "Van Rijn"

"The other planets? Well, they just happen to be there, but the
point of rockets is to explore them!" -- Kai Yeves

"Impact" [2008]

__________________
*

So a chunk of brown dwarf (of any size) that flew out into space would become a cloud of brown dwarf once it reached Earth and would thus be rendered harmless.

- Maha Vailo

__________________
When you get down to it, Science answers how. Religion answers why. - hippietrekx

The Warp Point, my new geek culture blog.

If they had said chunk of neutron star would it have been more believable? Its my understanding that neutron stars are composed of neutrons, which are very stable, so
you wouldn't have to worry about the pressure caused by the Pauli exclusion principle as you would in white dwarfs .

How many errors are there in their portrayal of electromagnetism? It seemed like Velikovsky was their science advisor. I'm no expert on electromagnetism, though- does anyone know what their specific mistakes were?

I watched half an hour of part 2 but couldn't sustain an interest. Part 1 felt as if some thought had gone into it, but part 2 became overwhelmed with technobabble and random threats.

And why is the gravity thing so selective? Grab the ship but not the surrounding water?

I might watch the rest later... then again, I might delete it unwatched.

__________________
Nothing beautiful was ever made from gravel.

Well, I switched my brain off and watched the rest. Quite enjoyable nonsense.

__________________
Nothing beautiful was ever made from gravel.

I think that probably isn't the case. The stuff inside neutron stars is a very dense, very hot fluid, which would expand into a gas of neutrons if removed from the star. Single neutrons outside of a nucleus or a neutron star have a half-life of 15 minutes or so, and would decay into ptotons or electrons. Or that is how I understand it, anyway.

If I'm right, there isn't any stable form of ultradense matter that could be extracted from a neutron star. Or a brown dwarf for that matter.

__________________
New Orion's Arm Site . The Starlark . Against a Diamond Sky (OA Novella Collection) . OA Flickr set

If something twice the mass of Earth hit the moon, it would keep right on going; the moon has insufficient mass to stop it. The energy released would be huge and the moon get turned into a molten blob. Some material would certainly get ejected, but probably with sufficient velocity to escape Earth for the most part.

The orbital effects on Earth and the Moon would be huge and hard to predict; even if nothing physically collided we'd probably wind up in the sun or ejected from the solar system (like in the recent Nature article), even if the "object" was a diffuse gas cloud twice the mass of Earth.

__________________
Do try not to take me too seriously.

^ How long would it take for Earth to fry/freeze in such a scenario?

- Maha "look out world!" Vailo

__________________
When you get down to it, Science answers how. Religion answers why. - hippietrekx

The Warp Point, my new geek culture blog.

And the entire planet would be covered with some kind of brown goo.

Sorry, I didn't mean to start talking politics!

__________________
Where mainstream ideas can't be found,
some novel theories can be had.
But keep your feet both on the ground;
Sometimes the astronomy's bad.

You may see the cosmos through the noise,
But take care which path you choose.
Remember when reading conspiracy ploys,
A mind's a terrible thing to lose.

So keep your spider sense on high
And before they drive you to booze,
Take time to roll up your pant legs, boys,
It's too late to save your shoes.

Maybe I'm missing something but their brilliant plan to save the earth doesn't make much sense. They're going to magnetize the moon while it's moving away from Earth so that the moon and the brown dwarf repel each other. Then the brown dwarf will be shot into the sun. But won't the moon also be shot in the opposite direction,i.e. toward the Earth?

Wow...I'm watching part 2 right now, it's like a train wreck, so horrible but I just can't look away. I feel insulted that a show with this many awful science premises made it to primetime. Now people are going to watch this and come to us astrophysicists and ask, "I'm scared, could this really happen?"
"No, this can't really happen. If it did, it'd be a movie. A really horrible movie."
I probably won't get all of the errors, just the main ones:
The moon does NOT have a magnetic field.
IF a brown dwarf did get anywhere close to Earth, we'd see it coming. They still have significant infrared emission.
IF something massive impacted the moon, the lodging and geological processes they're talking about take millions of years, because we're talking about rocks here. If anything, the impactor would either shatter on the surface, or shatter the moon, rather than fracturing it.
IF such an impact altered the course of the moon, it's resulting orbit change, IF becoming more elliptical, must have the Earth at one of the foci, not halfway like they seem to "calculate." Plus, improper use of Kepler's 3rd law.
"Anything is possible now..." - I'm sorry, but this is PHYSICS. The laws of physics don't change. They're laws.
Gravity is not localized, ever. It will always follow the inverse square law. It also cannot pick and choose what to act on (an oil tanker floats in the air but not the water around it?).
Axis peak = Apahelion. PLEASE just use the right words at least.
I'm not even going to comment on "plan B" to save the moon, it's just ridiculously confusing and an excuse the throw out popular buzzwords like "carbon nanotubes" and "space elevator."
If we are supposed to suspend disbelief this far, it should be set in a non-real universe, ideally not around Earth.
If I've errored in any of the details, please feel free to correct me.

I haven't even seen it and I feel queasy.

-- Jeff, in Minneapolis

__________________
http://www.FreeMars.org/jeff/

"I find astronomy very interesting, but I wouldn't if I thought we
were just going to sit here and look." -- "Van Rijn"

"The other planets? Well, they just happen to be there, but the
point of rockets is to explore them!" -- Kai Yeves

Well, after four years of revived Doctor Who, Impact looks like a university-funded science documentary in comparison.

__________________
Nothing beautiful was ever made from gravel.

Sounds like the cheesy end of the world disaster movies I like to watch....

__________________
"Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast light travels it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it." — Terry Pratchett, Reaper Man

441!!!! :)

Welcome to BAUT Forum!
{My correction}
That was my main beef, their coinage of the term "axis peak" for apogee. Didn't they hire any consultants? If that had any science consultants, did they pay them? Maybe they should ask for their money back?

And it's not like "apogee" is some esoteric science term, either. I'll bet most First World people (once you remove the people that the Jaywalking segment of the Tonight Show always seems to find) know what an apogee is or could have figured it out from the context. This was a truly, truly stinky movie. Or to use a term I dropped in another thread, USDA Certified Grade AAA twaddle.

__________________
Microsoft is over if you want it.

The bar has been lowered for the promotion of ATM ideas; the bar for the acceptance of ATM ideas must remain high.