If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Bad Astronomy > Bad Astronomy Stories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-June-2006, 04:11 AM
blc303 blc303 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 10
Default Congressional voting records by astrological sign

This from just in from Wonkette.

Quote:
The Washington Post’s Congressional Votes Database is an invaluable resource. It displays votes by the legislator’s party, state, region, gender — and astrological sign. [my emphisis]
WP Votes Database (Vote 163). Scroll to the bottom and click on astrological sign.

*heavy sigh*

Although on the other hand, great gist for the skeptics mill.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-June-2006, 03:43 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is online now
Vulcan Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 23,998
Default

Oh, dear ....
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-June-2006, 04:04 AM
sarongsong's Avatar
sarongsong sarongsong is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,884
Default

Ha---first time I've seen astrological signs arranged in alphabetical rather than chronological order, outside a dictionary.
Hmmh---how about a 12-party system?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-June-2006, 05:21 AM
The Bad Astronomer's Avatar
The Bad Astronomer The Bad Astronomer is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,861
Default

What.

The.

(*$(*^#$)*$)*&%)&*%.

Is this a WaPo thing? Or something our government does?

Holy cow. I am so getting to the bottom of this.
__________________
Phil Plait
The Bad Astronomer
http://www.badastronomy.com
badastro@badastronomy.com
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-June-2006, 07:51 AM
davidhw davidhw is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 28
Default what's really amusing

is that there's absolutely no consistency in how Senators voted based on their sign. Shouldn't everyone born under the same sign think similarly about similar issues?

I don't know how to say this, but I think ... I think ... there just *might* be something specious about astrology.

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-June-2006, 11:35 AM
blc303 blc303 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 10
Default

Davidhw
Quote:
what's really amusing

is that there's absolutely no consistency in how Senators voted based on their sign. Shouldn't everyone born under the same sign think similarly about similar issues?
That's what i meant when I said
Quote:
Although on the other hand, great gist for the skeptics mill.
What is interesting though is that the number of Senators/Sign is really weird. (Click on the sign to get the list of who is what). Leo's are really "underrepresented" (pun intended) and Aqurius, Scorpio and Taurus "overrepresented".

I suspect a deeper astrological meaning! See the Republicans really are waging a War on Science and messing with averages. Somebody tell Chris Mooney or Michael Shermer!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-June-2006, 12:09 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 6,592
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blc303
Davidhw
What is interesting though is that the number of Senators/Sign is really weird. (Click on the sign to get the list of who is what). Leo's are really "underrepresented" (pun intended) and Aqurius, Scorpio and Taurus "overrepresented".
Uhmmm, not weird. I'm not sure of the statistics, but the planned pregnencies that I know about have always been timed so that the third trimester is not in the summer. Usually the January to April timeframe.
And I do have vague recollections statistics stated when (I think it was BMV registration) went from last initial to birth date.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Astronomer
What.
The.
(*$(*^#$)*$)*&%)&*%.
Is this a WaPo thing? Or something our government does?
Holy cow. I am so getting to the bottom of this.
This could be interesting. For the BA to nudge close to rule number 3, there might be some real bottom getting.

edit: typo
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-June-2006, 01:10 PM
blc303 blc303 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 10
Default

NEOWatcher

Quote:
I'm not sure of the statistics, but the planned pregnencies that I know about have always been timed so that the third trimester is not in the summer. Usually the January to April timeframe.
Um... No. August traditionally has the highest rate of birth. (Pre Christmas spooning perhaps?)

A quick spot check
Vital Statistics of the United States 1945
Vital Statistics of the United States 1962 (also with data going back to 1953)
Monthly Vital Statistics Report; Vol. 26, No. 12 Supplement (3/29/78) *
National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 50, No. 5 (2/12/2002)

Each shows August having the highest birthrate.

That's what really made me wonder. I still think it's a plot!

*Edit: Added Statistics for 1976 (which interestingly show September as #1 and August as number 2) and typo.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-June-2006, 01:32 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 6,592
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blc303
Each shows August having the highest birthrate.
Well, there you have it... statistics trumps anecdotal evidence any day.
Quote:
Originally Posted by blc303
That's what really made me wonder. I still think it's a plot!
So now that I am presented with data, you have me convinced that this should be moved to CT.
Or; could it be that Aqurius, Scorpio and Taurus are signs that tend to go into politics and Leos tend to be followers.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-June-2006, 02:50 PM
HenrikOlsen's Avatar
HenrikOlsen HenrikOlsen is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark 55.6773° N 12.3610° E
Posts: 4,428
Send a message via MSN to HenrikOlsen Send a message via Yahoo to HenrikOlsen
Default

Or that the sample is so small that randomness is king.
__________________
An emperor without enemies, a king without a kingdom, supported in life by the willing tribute of a free people.
Cincinnati Enquirer headline about Emperor Norton I
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-June-2006, 04:17 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 6,592
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HenrikOlsen
Or that the sample is so small that randomness is king.
Or maybe they did the survey at Chuckie Cheese in July
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-June-2006, 04:58 PM
The Bad Astronomer's Avatar
The Bad Astronomer The Bad Astronomer is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,861
Default

With only 100 Senators divided into 12 bins, you expect 8.5 Senators per bin (and if they would only let me choose which ones to cut in half...). If births are random, then the standard deviation you expect in each bin is the square root of the number in the bin. Sqrt(8.5) is roughly 3.

Now, it's not too unlikely to get fluctuations of 3 standard deviations, though 2 is more likely (of course). So you might see as few as 2 Senators in a bin, or as many as 14. In reality, getting no Senators in one astrological sign wouldn't surprise me too much. Unusual, yes; impossible, of course not.
__________________
Phil Plait
The Bad Astronomer
http://www.badastronomy.com
badastro@badastronomy.com
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-June-2006, 07:36 PM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 11,922
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blc303
Um... No. August traditionally has the highest rate of birth. (Pre Christmas spooning perhaps?)
Ah, but it was specified that we were talking about planned pregnancies! If I were to attempt planning when I were going to have a child, I sure wouldn't pick August. (For one thing, it's the only month of the year when I reliably have plans.) However, I don't think the majority of parents put much thought into it. In fact, my pregnancy was pretty unplanned in every sense of the word.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-June-2006, 11:11 PM
Tog_'s Avatar
Tog_ Tog_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 2,682
Default

The times the GF and I have talked about kids, it was pretty much a given that we would try to time the birth for April/May if at all possible. She doesn't want to spend the summer pregnant. I'd hate to have to dash to the hospital during a huge snowstorm. (And freakishly heavy snowfalls are common in Salt Lake/Ogden Utah) Not to mention the fact we were both born in December and having a birthday around Christmas wasn't fun. Get the toys on the 25th and the batteried a few days later. No good outside toys since they all break or get lost waiting for spring...

Yeah, April or May if we have a say in it.
__________________
I'm not gullible because I'm a Leo.--Actually said to me by a co-worker
Never trust anyone with 'The' for a middle name. --Said to me by a guy in Denny's at 4 am.
The difference between planning and pessimism can only be seen in retrospect. -- One of mine
Truth ain't like puppies; a bunch of them running around and you get to pick the one you like best." -- Emerson on Pushing Daisies
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-June-2006, 11:54 PM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 11,922
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tog_
Not to mention the fact we were both born in December and having a birthday around Christmas wasn't fun. Get the toys on the 25th and the batteried a few days later. No good outside toys since they all break or get lost waiting for spring...
Oh, and don't forget the "Christmas and birthday presents," which were pretty much invariably worse than what my sisters got for either. (I'm December 6; they're September 9 and 10. Really. And no, they're not twins--I'm the middle child!)
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 10-June-2006, 01:14 AM
Tog_'s Avatar
Tog_ Tog_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 2,682
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gillianren
Oh, and don't forget the "Christmas and birthday presents," which were pretty much invariably worse than what my sisters got for either. (I'm December 6; they're September 9 and 10. Really. And no, they're not twins--I'm the middle child!)
Heh, Dec 28 here. I was serious about the toys for Christmas and the batteries for my birthday. On time, three days later. One year we put off my birthday til April to do outdoor toys. And people I know wonder why holidays mean so little to me.
__________________
I'm not gullible because I'm a Leo.--Actually said to me by a co-worker
Never trust anyone with 'The' for a middle name. --Said to me by a guy in Denny's at 4 am.
The difference between planning and pessimism can only be seen in retrospect. -- One of mine
Truth ain't like puppies; a bunch of them running around and you get to pick the one you like best." -- Emerson on Pushing Daisies
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 12-June-2006, 03:56 AM
blc303 blc303 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Astronomer
With only 100 Senators divided into 12 bins, you expect 8.5 Senators per bin (and if they would only let me choose which ones to cut in half...). If births are random, then the standard deviation you expect in each bin is the square root of the number in the bin. Sqrt(8.5) is roughly 3.

Now, it's not too unlikely to get fluctuations of 3 standard deviations, though 2 is more likely (of course). So you might see as few as 2 Senators in a bin, or as many as 14. In reality, getting no Senators in one astrological sign wouldn't surprise me too much. Unusual, yes; impossible, of course not.
Actually my comments in that direction were more than tongue in cheek.

But the refutation is much easier. Just click back 'up' the heirarchy and check the stats for the House as opposed to the Senate. Leo is then better represented in the larger sample space.

If the statistics wouldn't have worked out, one would have to take action. Something like (I don't know) writing your congressperson!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 12-June-2006, 08:43 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 10,434
Default

Well, there is a precident for astrology in US politics Time Magazine
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 26-June-2006, 08:03 PM
Celestial Mechanic's Avatar
Celestial Mechanic Celestial Mechanic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 3,891
Default

I wonder when the constellation Mustela, the Weasel was added to the zodiac?
__________________
Microsoft is over if you want it.

The bar has been lowered for the promotion of ATM ideas; the bar for the acceptance of ATM ideas must remain high.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0