|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Ian, are you still getting that problem? I don't see it on my browser, and it may have been a temp thing while I fiddled with the code.
__________________
Phil Plait The Bad Astronomer http://www.badastronomy.com badastro@badastronomy.com |
|
||||
|
It seems to be down. Possibly for server maintenance or the mentioned move to an own server... ?
I cannot access it since 7:00h CET this morning. Now its 18:38h CET and still the site is inaccessible.
__________________
"Who does not know anything, must believe everything." Baroness Marie von Ebner-Eschenbach 1830-1916 |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Bad Astronomy BAUT Forum Were all just down for a couple more hours. Now back. BA Blog: BA Hostiness Issues Quote:
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... |
|
||||
|
(Repeated from another related thread)
Today at work, when I was looking at Phil's blog, on my works PC, which being a civil service PC is supposed to be running top notch security, supported by a professional company, this pop up occured again. This time I looked at the name before I went through the emergency kill procedures, and it is call Error Safe Info from Symantec Info from Yahoo Answers The Symantec site has given me details of what to look for in terms of folders, which I plan to look at tonight when I get home. Incidentally when I replied to a comment about not clicking on ads, that reply went to waiting for moderation - what happened here
__________________
Fame, glory adventure, a cyber warrior craves not these things. |
|
||||
|
Someone else has had this problem on Phil's blog
BTW I have now checked using the instructions on the Symantec site and there is still no evidence that Error Safe has planted itself.
__________________
Fame, glory adventure, a cyber warrior craves not these things. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
So, what's your claim? That the ad was offered up by the BA Blog and it should not have been? Is there evidence for that? Did it come certainly from the BA site? Is the BA site policy never to offer up such an ad? In the meantime, I'm having trouble bringing my concern up to your level. I go to the BA Blog several times a day, and I don't recall seeing the ad. I don't do much to block ads, but I do block pop-ups. I know I've never accepted the Error Safe offer. I don't click on ads.
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Plus I am not the only one this has happened to Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Fame, glory adventure, a cyber warrior craves not these things. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's not clear to me why you think the BA Blog site is "hijacked". What does hijacking mean to you? Again, did the BA Blog offer up the ad? Nothing else could have? Is it the policy of the BA Blog to never offer up such an ad? Let's get your claim clear, please. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'm sorry, but your evidence that the BA Blog is doing something wrong is very slim.
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Fame, glory adventure, a cyber warrior craves not these things. |
|
||||
|
So it didn't shut down or take over your browser. It closed some windows and opened some others. That's a lot less than the impression I first received. That's a good deal less than hijacking, in my book. You haven't lost control. You have no damages.
I wouldn't want an ad to do that, but it's certainly far from being worrisome. It would be a nuisance for sure if an advertiser did that. One would hope the BA Blog would not provide such ads. Does it? I don't know. Do you know? For sure? What do you want us to do? Anything? What do you want the BA to do? Should he accuse his ad server of providing such an ad? How would he convince them that they did? Should he just pick a different ad server? Should he stop advertising?
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... |