Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Bad Astronomy > Bad Astronomy Stories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

View Poll Results: Should Sell The Right To Post logos On the Shuttle Tank
Yea Great way To Fund Space Missions 35 74.47%
Nope It's Just cost Nasa Goverment Funding 2 4.26%
No Way SPace should Only Be for The Snob's, <like me> 5 10.64%
What Funding, 5 10.64%
Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 06-December-2006, 02:36 AM
Ronald Brak Ronald Brak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,326
Default

Quote:
0. Starting a sentence with and is very poor grammar. And, don't end a sentence with a preposition (with).
So standard spoken English is wrong? Or does this only apply to written English? Or is a spoken sentence starting with and not actually a sentence and actually something else making it okay?
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 06-December-2006, 08:44 AM
JonClarke JonClarke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,087
Default

So this is a situation we should not up with put?
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 06-December-2006, 12:23 PM
Ronald Brak Ronald Brak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,326
Default

Quote:
So this is a situation we should not up with put?
There are many people in this world who find it hard to communicate clearly at all. If they manage to convey their meaning clearly, then I think, "Hooray! Give them a lolipop!" These people need to be helped with making sense of their ideas in English and informing them of the finer points of grammer can result in their language centers ceasing up entirely. I suggest a computer program be applied to this forum that will grade people's posts and roughly determine their communication ability and provide a convenient graphical reference so people will know who should be congratualted for managing to make sense at all and who should know better than to make grammatical errors and deserves a good drubbing from grammar gurus.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 06-December-2006, 01:32 PM
MrClean's Avatar
MrClean MrClean is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 558
Default

I used to use that function of WordPerfect years ago. After the third time it said I was communicating at a 4th grade level, I turned the smartypants off.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 06-December-2006, 03:24 PM
Spock Jenkins Spock Jenkins is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 909
Default

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say hiring Masters level or higher serves two purposes.

It gives the hiring party something tangible to validate the knowledge and/or experience claimed in a resume. It's a lot more costly and time consuming to verify claimed real world experience than it is to verify a post graduate degree. This, in turn, makes the claimed real world experience that much more believable and less important to spend a lot of time or money validating.

It gives the hiring party something tangible to defend the hire with in case that employee makes a huge costly mistake. "I know they didn't pursue formal education beyond high school - but their resume said..."
__________________
Spock Jenkins of the Vulcan Jenkins'.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 06-December-2006, 03:38 PM
R.A.F.'s Avatar
R.A.F. R.A.F. is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,081
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spock Jenkins View Post
...gives the hiring party something tangible to validate the knowledge and/or experience claimed in a resume.
But of course...

There is nothing "snobbish" about wanting to hire qualified people to do highly technical jobs.

I really don't know why Tuero has a problem with that.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 06-December-2006, 05:47 PM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,566
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Brak View Post
So standard spoken English is wrong? Or does this only apply to written English? Or is a spoken sentence starting with and not actually a sentence and actually something else making it okay?
First off, there are several types of written English. The kind we use here is informal, which means you will see a lot of things from me that you wouldn't see in formal English--such as my predilection for dashes, parentheses, and italics.

It also applies to starting sentences with conjunctions. I wouldn't do it in, oh, college application essays, gods know, but it is a stylistic choice. Starting every sentence (see, there I go) with a conjunction is a bad thing, but a few here and there is no big deal. Heck, I do it all the time. Strunk & White says it's okay to do now and again.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 07-December-2006, 01:56 AM
Ronald Brak Ronald Brak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,326
Default

Thanks for the explanation Gillianren.

Would it be bad for your blood pressure if I asked what a conjunction is?

Maybe I'll go look it up on the internets.
Reply With Quote
Old 07-December-2006, 02:52 PM
MrClean
This message has been deleted by MrClean.
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 11-December-2006, 01:31 AM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,566
Default

Didn't you see Schoolhouse Rock! in the 70s? "Conjunction Junction" and all that?

No. Well. A conjuction is a part of speech that is used to hold clauses together when each clause is a complete sentence. The mnemonic I currently use to remember all of them is "FAN BOYS"--for and nor but or yet so. That's it. That's all the conjunctions in the English language.

Of course, conjunctions also string lists of words together, or at least, some of them do, but mostly clauses. (As in right there, though "mostly clauses" isn't actually a complete sentence.) I can go more into detail, of course, but it's up to you.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 11-December-2006, 02:08 AM
Ronald Brak Ronald Brak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,326
Default

Quote:
Didn't you see Schoolhouse Rock! in the 70s?
Sorry, Queensland was still in the dark ages back in the 70's.

So in the sentence, "Put the cane toad in the pot but don't cook it too long," the word "but" would be a conjunction?
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 11-December-2006, 02:32 AM
Lonewulf's Avatar
Lonewulf Lonewulf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Eppelheim, Germany
Posts: 4,124
Send a message via AIM to Lonewulf
Default

Personally, I fully support space tourism; the person going up is fully aware of the consequences, money gets pumped into the industry, and we set precedents of "non-skilled passengers" being put into space, giving the far-reaching implication that everyday people -- such as you and I, viewer of my post -- can go into space in future time periods.

I personally see it as no different than having a civilian passenger on a military boat, or a civilian inside of a submarine; they know the risks, and as long as they have some sort of a benefit (such as pumping funds into the project), I think that it's a risk worth taking; or at the least, unless the risks are shown to outweigh the benefits, which I don't currently see at the moment. I think that the benefits are pretty... er... benefitty. But I'm just a layman, so what do I know?
__________________
"A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong gives it a superficial appearance of being right." -- Thomas Paine

Being intelligent is not a felony. But most societies evaluate it as at least a misdemeanor. -- Heinlein

Creationists make it sound as though a "theory" is something you dreamt up after being drunk all night. -- Isaac Asimov
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 11-December-2006, 07:22 AM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,566
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Brak View Post
Sorry, Queensland was still in the dark ages back in the 70's.
I keep forgetting; you don't put a location in your information.

Quote:
So in the sentence, "Put the cane toad in the pot but don't cook it too long," the word "but" would be a conjunction?
Yes. However, there should be a comma before "but."
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 11-December-2006, 07:44 AM
Ronald Brak Ronald Brak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,326
Default

Quote:
I keep forgetting; you don't put a location in your information.
I'll have to work out how to do that one of these days. (We're celebrating 30 glorious years of electricity next week.)

Quote:
Yes. However, there should be a comma before "but."
Thanks - Put the cane toad in the pot, but don't cook it too long.

We tanned his hid when he died Clyde AND that's it hanging on the shed. - "And" being the conjunction.

Dig the hole with your hands, boys, SO they'll think a wombat did it.

Crikey, that's a big one, BUT mine's bigger.

That's not a knife, BUT this is a knife.

Hopefully I have the hang of it now.

FAN BOYS - For, And, Nor, But, Or, Yet, SO.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 11-December-2006, 10:25 AM
TriangleMan's Avatar
TriangleMan TriangleMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Qatar
Posts: 3,528
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gillianren View Post
Didn't you see Schoolhouse Rock! in the 70s? "Conjunction Junction"
hooking up words and phrases and clauses
__________________
Now while I might be amused by Cthulhians, I don't necessarily distrust them to carry out the functions of government. -- JayUtah

What's it like being a skeptic in the Middle East? Check out my blog.
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 11-December-2006, 12:40 PM
MrClean's Avatar
MrClean MrClean is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 558
Default

I had more of a Classical education, we had to watch Schoolhouse Bachs.
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 11-December-2006, 08:05 PM
Doodler's Avatar
Doodler Doodler is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 9,403
Send a message via AIM to Doodler Send a message via MSN to Doodler
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuero View Post
My reply to that is. There has yet to be a shuttle mission. That carried the max number of people the shuttle is able to lift.

Que? If memory serves, the shuttle lofts a max crew of seven, and if memory continues to serve, we've lost 14 people in two shuttle accidents.

I'm not the math major of this here forum, but 14/2=7 last I checked....
__________________
I'm not completely heartless, the doctor who removed it told me he'd never be able to get it all.
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 11-December-2006, 10:10 PM
Ilya's Avatar
Ilya Ilya is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 2,995
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doodler View Post
Que? If memory serves, the shuttle lofts a max crew of seven...
No, the most ever flew on Shuttle is seven. IIRC, it is possible to fit eight seats in the crew compartment; it was never done. And of course, you could carry several more if some kind of habitable module were placed in the cargo compartment.
__________________
Fiction has to be plausible. Reality is under no such constraint.
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2006, 03:42 AM
Tuero Tuero is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9
Default

Since I started this Thread let me make a few points here.
Anyone going into space has to know it's a risk, anyone wanting to die of old age should not bother. Personally I would go into space with less than 5% chance of making it back. With out even having to think about it.
As for letting unskilled people into jobs they can't do. I never ever said that. What I did say was that Limiting jobs in space to members of the egg head club was Snobbish. I can not believe there are not any jobs in space for anyone not a member of the egg head club.
I also never said to look down on anyone with a list of degrees to their names. What I did say is that it is not the end all . When looking at who should go into space. An yes NASA turns their nose up at anyone not a member of the egg head club.
NASA Should also Remember that all most all it's funding comes from the US government. Which reacts to Public Opinion. AN How many people have PH D's or even a master Degree.
Also where did all these grammar cops come from.
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2006, 11:07 AM
Lonewulf's Avatar
Lonewulf Lonewulf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Eppelheim, Germany
Posts: 4,124
Send a message via AIM to Lonewulf
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuero View Post
Since I started this Thread let me make a few points here.
Anyone going into space has to know it's a risk, anyone wanting to die of old age should not bother. Personally I would go into space with less than 5% chance of making it back. With out even having to think about it.
Agreed, though I'd hold out for a 20% chance at the least...

Quote:
As for letting unskilled people into jobs they can't do. I never ever said that. What I did say was that Limiting jobs in space to members of the egg head club was Snobbish. I can not believe there are not any jobs in space for anyone not a member of the egg head club.
I also never said to look down on anyone with a list of degrees to their names. What I did say is that it is not the end all . When looking at who should go into space. An yes NASA turns their nose up at anyone not a member of the egg head club.
They look for some of the best mental and physical attributes, and the astronauts have quite a bit of training in everything from aeronautical mechanics to calculus to everything else necessary to survive. There's a logical reason for sending up the best of the best...

Quote:
NASA Should also Remember that all most all it's funding comes from the US government. Which reacts to Public Opinion. AN How many people have PH D's or even a master Degree.
As a member of the general public, I would consider them achievin