Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Bad Astronomy > Bad Astronomy Stories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-June-2007, 12:36 AM
Crimson Crimson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 328
Default Bad Astronomy in Sky & Telescope: Supernovae

The sidebar "The Creative Side of Supernovae" on page 29 of the March 2007 issue of Sky and Telescope contains erroneous claims about nucleosynthesis.

Quote:
supernovae synthesized and dispersed many of the heavy elements (such as oxygen, calcium, phosphorus, and silicon) that built the planets and made life possible on Earth.
No, supernovae did not synthesize most of these elements. For example, oxygen arose when the pre-supernova star burned helium. Then the supernova explosion dispersed the oxygen into space. But the explosion did not create most of the oxygen.

Quote:
Supernovae also created the elements heavier than iron (such as nickel, lead, and uranium) that human society exploits for machines and energy.
Supernovae did create most of the elements heavier than iron, but not all of them--and not most lead.

There are two main ways that elements heavier than iron arose. The first is the r-process, in which a rapid flux of neutrons transforms iron-peak nuclei into heavier ones. The r-process is thought to occur in supernova explosions and created most gold, platinum, silver, and most other elements heavier than iron, including all uranium.

But there is another process, the s-process, that also created some of the elements heavier than iron. The s-process occurs when a slow flux of neutrons transforms iron-peak nuclei into heavier ones. It operates in red giants and supergiants, not supernovae. According to Table 5 of Burris et al. in The Astrophysical Journal, volume 544, page 302, the following elements--all heavier than iron--are made mostly by the s-process: gallium, krypton, strontium, yttrium, zirconium, niobium, molybdenum, tin, barium, lanthanum, cerium, tungsten, mercury, thallium, and lead. Recent research suggests that we can add copper to this list.

Meanwhile, the July 2007 issue of Sky and Telescope contains an error the magazine has made before. Page 33 has a picture of a supernova and the caption: "In March 1994 a Type Ia supernova erupted on the outskirts of NGC 4526, an edge-on disk galaxy in Virgo."

But that supernova probably did not occur in the galaxy's outskirts. The June 2004 issue of the magazine ran the same picture with a similar caption, prompting a letter from Vera Rubin that appeared on page 12 of the September 2004 issue: "[C]ontrary to the caption, the supernova is probably not in the outskirts of the galaxy. The beautiful gas and dust disk, which looks so dim and mysterious in the photo, is a small, rapidly rotating nuclear disk with a radius only about 7 percent of the optical radius of the galaxy. If the supernova is located in or near the principal plane of NGC 4526, then its distance from the center is less than 15 percent of the galaxy's visible radius."
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Clueless - Need Help with 1st Telescope borg_minion Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories 13 11-January-2006 07:36 AM
Will astronomy come under attack in the classroom? Wolverine Off-Topic Babbling 131 09-March-2005 08:36 PM
Bad astronomy in 16-Apr-2004 Sky & Telescope tracer Small Media at Large 2 21-April-2004 01:49 AM
Chances for a career in astronomy? reptile Astronomy 12 13-January-2004 11:24 PM
Of telescopes and astronomy clubs Comixx Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories 3 04-April-2003 05:39 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today