Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Bad Astronomy > Bad Astronomy Stories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-March-2008, 06:02 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default What on earth is a "galaxy hoax"?

While scanning the sidebar on BA's blog, I noticed this:

I don't recall ever having seen BA talk about any Galaxy Hoax. Is this some new conspiracy theory out there that just started up?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-March-2008, 09:13 PM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,463
Default

ABC (Australia) News in Science: Galaxy hoax claims we're aliens

Quote:
It says that our sun and all its planets do not belong to the Milky Way but rather to a stream of stars being stripped from a dwarf galaxy known as Sagittarius Dwarf.
See BA Blog:
Is the Sun from another galaxy?
Alien Sun followup
Alien Sun, final (?) comment
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-March-2008, 05:55 PM
Trebuchet's Avatar
Trebuchet Trebuchet is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The great NorthWet
Posts: 2,056
Default

Note that those "popular searches" are placed by Google and not related to the BA's content. I figured that out the other day when when I followed a "moon hoax" one and got a Hoagland page saying we did go to the moon and discovered crystal palaces!

Edit: or maybe not. I just tried that again and did seem to be getting BA content. I'm not sure what I followed!
__________________
Cum catapultae proscribeantur tum soli proscripti catapultas habeant.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-March-2008, 06:31 PM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trebuchet View Post
Edit: or maybe not. I just tried that again and did seem to be getting BA content. I'm not sure what I followed!
I'm pretty sure the searches asked about are the popular ones entered into that lijit.com searchbox just above them, right side of the Bad Astronomy main page (and maybe other pages).
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-July-2008, 12:38 AM
publiusr publiusr is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,181
Default

That's actually a little disappoining. For it would have meant we would pass 'over' the milky way. What a view that would have been....
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-July-2008, 07:21 AM
Drbuzz0's Avatar
Drbuzz0 Drbuzz0 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 333
Send a message via ICQ to Drbuzz0 Send a message via AIM to Drbuzz0 Send a message via MSN to Drbuzz0 Send a message via Yahoo to Drbuzz0 Send a message via Skype™ to Drbuzz0
Default

That's a hoax? Wow what a crappy hoax. It's not even cool if it were true.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-July-2008, 06:51 PM
redshifter's Avatar
redshifter redshifter is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wa state - Seattle area
Posts: 1,011
Default

If it were the case that our own star was part of a stream of stars being stripped from another galaxy, it would be easily visible I would think. Heck, the night sky would be that much cooler!

I have heard that the Sagittarius Dwarf is being 'eaten' by our galaxy, but it is very diffiucult to tell, since it is happening on the other side of our galaxies core in relation to us. Not sure if that has been verified or not though.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 17-July-2008, 07:53 AM
Urbane Guerrilla Urbane Guerrilla is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ventura County, California
Posts: 48
Default

That this is going on in our own personal Galaxy, right when we're looking, suggests that this kind of amoeboid accretion by engulfment is a routine phenomenon.

Do we know if this occurs with ellipticals? Stellar population suggests maybe not -- but okay, why not?
__________________
"The Minstrel Boy to the War is gone..."
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 17-July-2008, 07:58 PM
ngc3314's Avatar
ngc3314 ngc3314 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 87.5W 33.2N
Posts: 1,718
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla View Post
That this is going on in our own personal Galaxy, right when we're looking, suggests that this kind of amoeboid accretion by engulfment is a routine phenomenon.

Do we know if this occurs with ellipticals? Stellar population suggests maybe not -- but okay, why not?
Certainly, we can see examples. It doesn't cause the fireworks we see with spirals, with no cool gas to trigger new star formation, and the almost-randomly directed internal motions of stars mean that ellipticals don't make the kinds of narrow, obvious tails that disk galaxies do - more like broad, dim fans of starlight. Ellipticals pretty much merge to make bigger ellipticals, which may be important in working out where the very biggest and brightest "ordinary" galaxies come from. (The jargon for the process is "dry merging").
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 17-July-2008, 08:04 PM
agingjb's Avatar
agingjb agingjb is online now
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 683
Default

Why is this theory, which seems to be unsubstantiated but isn't on the face of it entirely ridiculous, a hoax?
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 17-July-2008, 11:11 PM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by agingjb View Post
Why is this theory, which seems to be unsubstantiated but isn't on the face of it entirely ridiculous, a hoax?
Perhaps ask the popular-science writer, Marilyn Head, who appears to have playfully invented the phrase: ABC (Australia) Science Online -- Galaxy hoax claims we're aliens

Quote:
First it was the moon hoax, then the Mars hoax and now astronomers warn there's a galaxy hoax.
The way it's written, I doubt astronomers actually used the phrase "galaxy hoax" to describe the claim -- at least before this story emerged.
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cosmogeology Margiani Against the Mainstream 146 17-February-2007 01:19 PM
Earth's axes shifted, what does this mean? EX Astronomy 50 11-January-2005 09:40 PM
Link(s) About Why We Are Alone Bill Thmpson Against the Mainstream 244 11-July-2004 01:03 AM
Discussion: Gravity Probe B's First Month In ... Fraser Universe Today Story Comments 2 26-May-2004 06:26 AM
idle moon math Geo3gh Astronomy 550 06-September-2002 06:19 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today