DaveC,

Over at Apollohoax you reported that Aulis told you:

"we have broadcast quality Beta SP dubs of virtually all the Apollo material including some of the dailies, the rushes recorded by the Apollo Station, Goldstone for 'making up' the Apollo record"

It seems they have more material than they can cope with, if they've managed to overlook at least 2 glaring examples of something they claim does not exist. If I ask nicely, I wonder if they'll let me lighten their load by taking this stuff off their hands and viewing it all for them. I'll give it a very good home.

Of course, it won't be easy having to sit through hours and hours of high quality original Apollo footage, but if I must suffer for science, then suffer I shall.

NasaStooge, Ill have to fight you for it. I want to suffer for science too!

Well, they say they have all that stuff, but we have yet to see the evidence, either through their "research" on it or their sharing it with others. It seems to me that if I had all that high quality stuff, I'd be making DVDs and selling it to dedicated people like you who would force themselves to look at it.

Oh, you dirty capitalist!

I, like Aulis(probably), am doing this in the interests of truth, not financial gain!

In that spirit, i would of course make available DVD copies of the material to johnno and other martyrs for free (+ expenses, postage & miscellaneous taxes)


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: NasaStooge on 2002-05-01 19:15 ]</font>

Self-consistency is one of Aulis' biggest problems. It gives the impression that their case is just a hodge-podge of ad hoc theories, one each for the various "anomalies". Unfortunately it's exactly Aulis' m.o. to try to get mileage out of both sides of a question: "It's suspicious that there is no record of the gymnastics that should have been possible" and "Why would the astronauts risk embarrassment and damage by attempting gymnastics."

That's exactly what I meant. It's the "plus expenses" part that I was talking about.

I just got my latest reply from Aulis. Despite my efforts to avoid being too aggressive, I seem to have ticked them off when I made the comment that they were skating around my question (whether Percy could actually reproduce the Armstrong leap sequence, rather than just say it's easy to do). The response was curt - "we stand by our previous emails to you". They did say a news release would be posted at Aulis Online in the next few days. Let's watch for it.

Don't you hate it when someone who says their evidence is unassailable won't answer even a simple question about it?

Jay's post captures the idiocy of Aulis's position perfectly - they are sucking and blowing at the same time.