Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > The Proving Grounds > Conspiracy Theories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2004, 03:05 AM
BigJim BigJim is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Jersey, Earth
Posts: 957
Default We didn't land on the Moon

I have 25 indisputable reasons why we did not land on the Moon:

1. It would have been impossible for the astroNOTS to get from the Command Module to the Conical Space Capsule, as the heat shield would obtruct them.

2. 35 years ago, I read in a textbook from 1959 that the Van Allen Belts contained deadly radiation that would kill anything in them.

3. There isn't any gravity on the Moon, so time would stop flowing and create an oxbow lake.

4. Oxygen turns into a different kind of oxygen when it leaves the Earth's atmosphere, so you couldn't breathe it.

5. It's 250 degrees on the Moon, so the astronauts would melt. This is also why NASA is covering up liquid water on the Moon, since its wicked witch-like astronauts would obviously melt from the water.

6. If I take a thumbnail image from an Apollo mission and blow it up to 5000% in Photoshop I can see alien cities.

7. There are no stars in the photographs.

8. Apollo 24 was supposed to have a color TV camera, but the studio lost power, so there was no TV. NASA's "excuse" was that the camera was "accidentally pointed at the Sun", but everyone knows there is no Sun on the Moon, otherwise the sky wouldn't appear to be black.

9. Israel is always on the top of Apollo pictures of the Earth, proving the whole thing was faked not by NASA, but by the Mossad.

10. Israel is always missing or barely visible from Apollo pictures of the Earth, proving that the whole thing was faked not by the Mossad, but by NASA.

11. There's nothing for rockets to push against in space. I tried jumping in midair but I couldn't, proving that rockets couldn't move in space.

12. The Apollo Conical Space Capsule(tm) couldn't have carried enough fuel to continuosly fire the engine for all two weeks of the mission. Bill Kaysing realized this in 1910, but he was fired from his highly technical NASA job by evil agents of Richard L. Nixon.

13. The Saturn V booster was almost 800 feet high. Since the Moon has 9 less gravities than Earth, than we should multiply the booster's height by the reciprocal of the 9 gravities, or 1/9. So why wasn't the lunar module 88.888 feet high?

14. All the Apollo pictures were faked in Photoshop. Anyone who thinks otherwise has been brainwashed with mind-expanding drugs.

15. The Moon is so bright that it can blind you in a telescope if you don't project it onto a piece of paper. The astronauts would have been blinded orbiting the Moon. In fact, I took an image of the Moon into Photoshop and turned up the contrast, and the Moon turned pure white while the rest of the sky was pure black. This proves that the Moon is a perfect reflector that reflects 100% of the light it receives from the Sun.

16. I took a picture from the Apollo 11 "landing" movie and processed it for 12 hours, and eventually I found an alien civilization there.

17. The Soviets were going to tip the world off to the fake, but they got wheat at reduced prices, so they decided not to.

18. When Nixon proposed the lunar landing program, he didn't know that Bill Kaysing had already decided it was impossible. So he decided in 1965 behind closed doors in Washington to fake the program.

19. The Saturn V actually fell apart as it launched into space. Amateur videos concealed from NASA clearly show huge parts of the Saturn V falling off of the rest of it, proving that the Saturn V was not a real rocket, but rather a hastily constructed, flimsy one.

20. Top-secret video from the Department of Top-Secret Coverups, from a camera in one of the six engines of the Saturn V that, amazingly could survive the heat of the engine with alien technology, also shows pieces of the Saturn V falling off.

21. Tom Hanks was able to fake it. I couldn't tell the difference.

22. If Apollo 13 really exploded, the astronauts would have died.

23. Someone told me once that the lunar module should have created a crater underneath it. But someone else told me it didn't. So it couldn't have landed.

24. There's no air in space to hold the dust grains on the lunar surface apart, so it should have compacted into a hard, rough, hard material.

So those are my 25 unbeatable reasons. I know you "nutters" are going to try to "debunk" my reasons, but it's not possible. I've been researching this since last Tuesday night, and I heard that a self-taught physicist found out that the astroNOTS couldn't fit through the lunar module's hatch. So there. Ha.
__________________
"Too low they build, who build beneath the stars". - Edward Young, 1745
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2004, 03:09 AM
Master258 Master258 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 513
Default

You're right. i can't debunk it. I am now a HBer.
__________________
The question isn't "what are we gonna do", the question is "what aren't we going to do."

I AM A GOLDEN GOD- Robert Plant, Led Zeppelin
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2004, 03:10 AM
AGN Fuel's Avatar
AGN Fuel AGN Fuel is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The beautiful Central Coast, NSW
Posts: 2,437
Default

To be so cynical at such a tender age....... :wink:


(I do like 19 & 20 - have to remember those. )
__________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day." - Douglas Adams

"Certainly, in the topsy-turvy world of heavy rock, having a good solid piece of wood in your hand is often useful." - Ian Faith
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2004, 04:45 AM
Wingnut Ninja Wingnut Ninja is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Middlebury, VT
Posts: 497
Send a message via AIM to Wingnut Ninja
Default Re: We didn't land on the Moon

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJim
19. The Saturn V actually fell apart as it launched into space. Amateur videos concealed from NASA clearly show huge parts of the Saturn V falling off of the rest of it, proving that the Saturn V was not a real rocket, but rather a hastily constructed, flimsy one.
I always thought that was the coolest part of a rocket launch, watching the ice- er, I mean, chunks of the spaceship falling off. Very dramatic. (which clearly means that rocket launches are faked, as nothing in real life can be dramatic)
__________________
Neither love nor money makes the world go round.
Unfortunately, we're down to about 17 ounces of the highly unstable stuff that does.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2004, 10:16 AM
AstroSmurf's Avatar
AstroSmurf AstroSmurf is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,038
Send a message via ICQ to AstroSmurf
Default Re: We didn't land on the Moon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wingnut Ninja
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJim
19. The Saturn V actually fell apart as it launched into space. Amateur videos concealed from NASA clearly show huge parts of the Saturn V falling off of the rest of it, proving that the Saturn V was not a real rocket, but rather a hastily constructed, flimsy one.
I always thought that was the coolest part of a rocket launch, watching the ice- er, I mean, chunks of the spaceship falling off. Very dramatic. (which clearly means that rocket launches are faked, as nothing in real life can be dramatic)
There's no water in space, so how can there be ice?????

Anyway, he's obviously talking about that the whole rocket came apart in space - I saw it myself on the Apollo 13 documentary, big honking chunks just breaking off and falling back to the Earth, rockets, fins the whole shebang.

Oh, and make that the "Van Halen" belts
__________________
"We do not require reality to conform to the expectations of the ignorant"
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2004, 10:23 AM
kucharek's Avatar
kucharek kucharek is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany, Old Europe
Posts: 4,148
Default Re: We didn't land on the Moon

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJim
23. Someone told me once that the lunar module should have created a crater underneath it. But someone else told me it didn't. So it couldn't have landed.
All lunar modules except Snoopy created craters. On their second "landing" attempt... ;-)

ABTN gives their estimated diameters as some 30 feet.

And we all know that Aquarius didn't produce a crater. Just a big hole in the water. ;-)

Harald
__________________
"Flying in space is risky business, but just staying on this planet is risky business too." - John Young, astronaut
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2004, 10:50 AM
JMV's Avatar
JMV JMV is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 454
Default

I loved #19! =D> Best one I've heard.
And like AstroSmurf suggested #2 should have said "Van Halen Belts".
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2004, 11:02 AM
Glom's Avatar
Glom Glom is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: West London, England
Posts: 8,425
Send a message via MSN to Glom
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjim
21. Tom Hanks was able to fake it. I couldn't tell the difference.
Sums up conspiracist mentality. If they don't know about it, it doesn't exist. If they don't understand it, it's inexplicable.

Marcus Allen made a similar comment about people not knowing the difference between training footage and real footage. Maybe he couldn't tell the difference, but we can.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2004, 06:45 PM
die Nullte die Nullte is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Temecula, California, USA
Posts: 338
Default

So he decided in 1965 behind closed doors in Washington to fake the program.

Nixon wasn't president in 1965.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2004, 08:01 PM
TaeKwonDan TaeKwonDan is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by die Nullte
So he decided in 1965 behind closed doors in Washington to fake the program.

Nixon wasn't president in 1965.
That's just what they want you to think.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2004, 08:10 PM
Parrothead's Avatar
Parrothead Parrothead is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Margaritaville
Posts: 1,935
Default

I didn't realize there were so many Apollo missions 24??? and I had no idea Kaysing was so old (see #12). :wink:
__________________
" The universe is running away
I heard it on the news just the other day
There's this new stuff called dark energy
We can't measure and we can't see..." - from Jimmy Buffett's What if the hokey pokey is all it really is about?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2004, 08:12 PM
BigJim BigJim is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Jersey, Earth
Posts: 957
Default

I Googled "apollo" and looked through the results for five minutes, disproving lifetimes of research on Apollo. Here are some more amazing FACTS that I have uncovered. All 16 of them.

1. It would have been impossible for the astronauts to get from the Command Module to the Conical Space Capsule, as the heat shield would obstruct them.

2. My Uncle Betty says that his aunt's cousin's wife's roomate's former acquiantance said that he didn't think we landed on the Moon.

4. On the Moon, there's no air to support combustion. Therefore, the lunar rover couldn't go.

3. There's no gas on the Moon, so the astronauts would have had no way to refuel the rover.

5. It would have been impossible for the astronauts to get from the Command Module to the Conical Space Capsule, as the heat shield would obstruct them.

6. Once I weighted a feather and dropped it and it dropped just as fast as a hammer, proving that the experiment from Apollo 22 was faked.

7. They could do it in Capricorn One.

8. Nixon had Kennedy shot by Castro because he knew that we couldn't land on the Moon. Nixon was elected president the next day.

9. On Apollo 9 the rocket was hit by lightning 8 times. But everyone knows that thunder is faster than lightning, so the astronauts would have heard thunder before the lightning hit.

10. It would have been impossible for the astroNOTS to get from the Command Module to the Conical Space Capsule, as the heat shield would obstruct them.

11. On Apollo 10, the booster "POGO"ed. But the pogo stick was invented in 1919, so they should have been able to solve this problem.

12. Neil Armstrong didn't fly all the missions.

13. I heard on a TV show that rendezvous in orbit is hard. So they couldn't have done it, unless they climbed up to the command module from the rope that was hanging out of it.

14. It would have been impossible for the astroNOTS to get from the Command Module to the Conical Space Capsule, as the heat shield would obstruct them.

15. Brad Guth said something about Venus.

As for your attempts to "debunk" me:

Quote:
Nixon wasn't president in 1965.
Yes he was. Nixon was a freemason.

Quote:
Marcus Allen made a similar comment about people not knowing the difference between training footage and real footage. Maybe he couldn't tell the difference, but we can.
But I can't. You nutters don't have open minds. How long will it take you to understand?

Oh, by the way, I have a great deal for you. I'm selling convecton ovens. Not only that, but I'm selling boxes of convection. That way, in case your convection oven runs out of convection, you can just pour in some more and it will keep convecting for you. I also carry a convection guage to tell you how much convection is left in your oven. Buy two convection ovens, get one antigrav free.
__________________
"Too low they build, who build beneath the stars". - Edward Young, 1745
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2004, 08:21 PM
die Nullte die Nullte is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Temecula, California, USA
Posts: 338
Default

Quote:
Quote:
Nixon wasn't president in 1965.
Yes he was. Nixon was a freemason.
Huh? Even Guth or Min might hesitate before offering this one.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2004, 08:54 PM
Glom's Avatar
Glom Glom is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: West London, England
Posts: 8,425
Send a message via MSN to Glom
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by die Nullte
Huh? Even Guth or Min might hesitate before offering this one.
You do know he's joking, right?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 17-May-2004, 09:35 PM
die Nullte die Nullte is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Temecula, California, USA
Posts: 338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glom
You do know he's joking, right?
Yes!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 18-May-2004, 04:18 PM
Rue's Avatar
Rue Rue is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bargain Bin
Posts: 817
Default

Quote:
17. The Soviets were going to tip the world off to the fake, but they got wheat at reduced prices, so they decided not to.
And the Australians were paid off in shrimp?
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 18-May-2004, 04:24 PM
kucharek's Avatar
kucharek kucharek is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany, Old Europe
Posts: 4,148
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rue
Quote:
17. The Soviets were going to tip the world off to the fake, but they got wheat at reduced prices, so they decided not to.
And the Australians were paid off in shrimp?
No, as latter they did with Skylab wreckage, they asked for a higher beef quota... ;-)

Harald
__________________
"Flying in space is risky business, but just staying on this planet is risky business too." - John Young, astronaut
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 18-May-2004, 05:32 PM
Master258 Master258 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 513
Default

Quote:
17. The Soviets were going to tip the world off to the fake, but they got wheat at reduced prices, so they decided not to.
Who doesn't want low priced wheat?
__________________
The question isn't "what are we gonna do", the question is "what aren't we going to do."

I AM A GOLDEN GOD- Robert Plant, Led Zeppelin
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 18-May-2004, 06:11 PM
BigJim BigJim is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Jersey, Earth
Posts: 957
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kucharek
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rue
Quote:
17. The Soviets were going to tip the world off to the fake, but they got wheat at reduced prices, so they decided not to.
And the Australians were paid off in shrimp?
No, as latter they did with Skylab wreckage, they asked for a higher beef quota... ;-)

Harald
We made a deal with the Australians in which we offered to stop killing Canadian kangaroos by the thousands in order for them to help us fake the moon landings. They agreed.
__________________
"Too low they build, who build beneath the stars". - Edward Young, 1745
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 18-May-2004, 08:59 PM
Lurker Lurker is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Cupertino CA
Posts: 2,561
Send a message via AIM to Lurker Send a message via MSN to Lurker Send a message via Yahoo to Lurker
Default

Quote:
1. It would have been impossible for the astroNOTS to get from the Command Module to the Conical Space Capsule, as the heat shield would obtruct them.
This one has always confused me... what are they talking about??
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 18-May-2004, 09:17 PM
JayUtah's Avatar
JayUtah JayUtah is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,318
Default

This is one of the charges made by the author of the NASAScam web site. He's obviously unaware of even the most basic facts about Apollo, confusing the various modules. Apparently he believes the astronauts were meant to pass between the conical command module and the cylindrical (unmanned) service module.
__________________
"Facts are stubborn things." --John Adams
Clavius Moon Base
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 18-May-2004, 10:15 PM
Lurker Lurker is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Cupertino CA
Posts: 2,561
Send a message via AIM to Lurker Send a message via MSN to Lurker Send a message via Yahoo to Lurker
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayUtah
This is one of the charges made by the author of the NASAScam web site. He's obviously unaware of even the most basic facts about Apollo, confusing the various modules. Apparently he believes the astronauts were meant to pass between the conical command module and the cylindrical (unmanned) service module.
Oh... well in that case... I guess we didn't go to the moon after all... 8)
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 18-May-2004, 10:26 PM
calliarcale calliarcale is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 475
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lurker
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayUtah
This is one of the charges made by the author of the NASAScam web site. He's obviously unaware of even the most basic facts about Apollo, confusing the various modules. Apparently he believes the astronauts were meant to pass between the conical command module and the cylindrical (unmanned) service module.
Oh... well in that case... I guess we didn't go to the moon after all... 8)
I've seen it elsewhere too, in a few variants, sometimes by the same HBer.

I've seen it claimed that they had to pass through the heatshield because the HBer thinks that the Service Module was habitable. Perhaps this arises from confusion with Soyuz, though frankly, I wouldn't give them that much credit. Somebody that ignorant of Apollo is unlikely to even know what a Soyuz looks like from the outside.

I've also seen it claimed that they must've had to climb back into the LM because that's the way they were stacked in the Saturn V. This ignores the flip-around maneuver, of course.

And I think it was on the NASAscam site where they claimed that they had to have gone through the heat shield (which they also said was impossible) because they couldn't possibly have gone through the top of the CM, because the parachutes were in the way. (This would also apply to Soyuz.)

Sidenote: a Soviet mission successfully tested the concept of a hatch in a heatshield. The hatch held up fine, with the heat of reentry simply fusing it shut as expected. The intention was to use this in the proposed Almaz-VA (Almaz being an orbiting lab and VA being a crew return vehicle; they'd be launched together, a la the USAF MOL concept, with the crew already on board. Unlike MOL, the crew would open a hatch in the VA spacecraft's heatshield to enter the orbiting lab. With MOL, either an inflatable passageway or a spacewalk was required to pass from the Gemini spacecraft to the lab.)
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 18-May-2004, 10:30 PM
Bob B.'s Avatar
Bob B. Bob B. is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 2,171
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glom
Marcus Allen made a similar comment about people not knowing the difference between training footage and real footage.
The football player?
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 18-May-2004, 10:52 PM
kucharek's Avatar
kucharek kucharek is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany, Old Europe
Posts: 4,148
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calliarcale
Sidenote: a Soviet mission successfully tested the concept of a hatch in a heatshield. The hatch held up fine, with the heat of reentry simply fusing it shut as expected. The intention was to use this in the proposed Almaz-VA (Almaz being an orbiting lab and VA being a crew return vehicle; they'd be launched together, a la the USAF MOL concept, with the crew already on board. Unlike MOL, the crew would open a hatch in the VA spacecraft's heatshield to enter the orbiting lab. With MOL, either an inflatable passageway or a spacewalk was required to pass from the Gemini spacecraft to the lab.)
AFAIK, the US also tested this. IIRC, it was the unmanned Gemini 2 capsule that just had made a suborbital test flight, that was modified with a heatshield with a hatch and flown again, making it the first reused spacecraft in history. I'll look for some link about this.

Harald

PS: http://whizzospace.com/museum/museum3.htm (with photo of hatch in heatshield)
__________________
"Flying in space is risky business, but just staying on this planet is risky business too." - John Young, astronaut
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 19-May-2004, 09:46 AM
Glom's Avatar
Glom Glom is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: West London, England
Posts: 8,425
Send a message via MSN to Glom
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob B.
The football player?
Editor of Nexus magazine and friend of David Percy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by calliarcale
Somebody that ignorant of Apollo is unlikely to even know what a Soyuz looks like from the outside.
If Nasascam weren't so amusing, it would be very angering to be criticised in such an arrogant and insulting manner when his knowledge of Apollo sucks so badly. If you can't tell the difference between the CM and the SM, you have no business coming to judgements about anything related to Apollo.

Of course, on the other hand, he is a disgrace to HBers and so discredits them. (as if they needed any help)
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 19-May-2004, 11:17 PM
Paul Beardsley's Avatar
Paul Beardsley Paul Beardsley is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Havant, England
Posts: 4,924
Default

The fliparound manouver is also proof that the moon landings were faked.

If I'm driving down the road in my car, and I suddenly do a u-turn, I'm heading back the way I came! It's simple physics, Bob.

Not that I drive much these days. I foolishly welded my car doors shut, so I can't get into my car without passing through the windshield.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 20-May-2004, 05:41 AM
TaeKwonDan TaeKwonDan is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 199
Default

You need to add the step where you tell anybody that logically and scientifically dissects your evidence that they're "not opening their eyes" or "engaging their brain." [-(
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 20-May-2004, 09:12 AM
genebujold's Avatar
genebujold genebujold is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,271
Default

I also did a Google search for critically super-scientific information on the Apollo program, and uncovered the following utterly indisputable facts. Only I used two windows so my search took only 2.5 minutes as opposed to BigJim's 5:

1. We never landed on the moon because Tony's mom said "there's an [adjective omitted] man down there at the water cooler who says NASA never landed on the Moon. Everyone was talking about it ... I just didn't know what to say!"

2. The stars did show up in the original "lunar" photographs taken right here on Earth, but were later removed by the NSA using Adobe Photoshop's original beta so no one could use celestial navigation to tell they weren't where they said they were.

3. The rocket couldn't have flown because as everyone knows, tall things tend to tip over, and the moment the tower released it the rocket would have fallen on it's side. That's why the space shuttle is so big and fat - it's more stable.

4. The space race was actully a plot hatched by accountants to funnel massive amounts of dollars away from the U.S. government. It worked, too. Everyone fell for it, including the engineers, mission support specialists, etc. The astronauts were bought off, as they'd be the only eyewitnesses.

5. If Saturn IV could have made it to the moon and back, the space shuttle, with it's vastly newer technology, would be able to make to Mars and back. It can't, so Saturn IV didn't.

6. The technology was so bad back then they couldn't even figure out how to put microphones in the helmets. That's why they used gold foil to cover the face, as the pics and movies are of stunt doubles. The real astronauts were off to the side recording their voices into microphones. Big ones.

7. As you can see here, there's a cat in the photo. http://www.geocities.com/nasascam/APOLLOSCAM/

Cats can't live on the moon. If they faked the photo, they would have had to fake the cat, too, as cats hate cameras.

8. NASA and the NSA are really the same organization, and the A really stands for American.

9. The NSA is a global organization, not just an American one.

10. Four years before they were supposed to land on the moon, the price of wheat in China went through the roof, which is why we agreed to sell wheat to Russia, because they couldn't afford to buy it from their neighbors anymore. The Russians lied, and re-sold the wheat to China, using the money to pay for their own space race.

11. Russian rockets don't fall over because they're wider at the bottom.

12. Since you can fake a picture of a cat on the moon, you can fake a picture of a man on the moon, and faking pictures is a lot cheaper, so it stands to reason the cheapest way to win the space race is just to fake it.

Ok, BigJim - you win. Yours had me in stiches! =D>
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 20-May-2004, 12:18 PM
PhantomWolf's Avatar
PhantomWolf PhantomWolf is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lost Deimos Moon Base
Posts: 5,663
Send a message via ICQ to PhantomWolf Send a message via AIM to PhantomWolf Send a message via MSN to PhantomWolf Send a message via Yahoo to PhantomWolf
Default

I have to ask, is the nasascam site serious? It seemed to be, well until they started going on about dogs and then posting a cat on the moon and the obviously faked double astronaut photo.
__________________
Howling from the Shadows

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. --- JayUtah

You can't reason an irrational person out of an irrational belief. --- Noclevername

Apollo: The History and the Hoax
Enter the World of Athran
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 12:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today