|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
"1) The LRV can't fit into the LM"
That's one of my favourites too. Ive made posts like this before as well [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img] Another good one is "it takes the shuttle 90 minutes to orbit the earth, so it should have taken the apollo spacecraft 25 minutes to orbit the moon, not 2 hours". Ive also had a few good laughs with people who cant figure out what's in the pictures. Jack White had a few jewels, like the 'inward opening in the LM descent stage opened with a zipper' (healium tank outward bulge, he figured why would the compartment be open if there were no footprints around it). Anyway gotta get ready for school, Ill see if I remember any more really good ones for later. Johnno |
|
|||
|
Also a lot of claims regarding 'if armstrong was the first man on the moon, who took the film of him descending the ladder?', and 'how did they film the ascent stages leaving the moon, if there were only two astronauts on the moon, and both returned in the LM?'
|
|
|||
|
It was always "the shadows" for me. The absolutely simplest thing for people to do is observe the behaviour of shadows here on earth and see if they can duplicate what they see in the lunar photographic record. Of course they could, but none of the HBs seem willing to try. Tells me something!
Oh - and of course Piper's long range photo anomalies. If he hadn't been such an obnoxious toad, it would have been even funnier than it was. <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: DaveC on 2002-05-03 10:21 ]</font> |
|
||||
|
I made this list of "stupid claims" a while back:
- The flag waves in a vacuum: it's obvious this only happens when an astronaut is holding it - No bad photos: five minutes at the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal will turn up plenty of bad photos - The astronauts wouldn't fit through the hatch: there are photos of the astronauts doing so, plus there are no actual measurements to indicate the contrary - The lunar rover wouldn't fit in the LM: Duh! It folded up! - There were no unmanned missions to the moon before Apollo: there were plenty
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling. |
|
|||
|
The most offensive claim was that the Apollo 1 fire was deliberate murder...
But the *funniest* I've ever heard was: "There's no gravity in space, so why didn't the astronauts just float away from the moon's surface?" (Answer: "They had weighted boots!") Silas |
|
||||
|
The funniest: The Saturn V was well over 300 feet tall. Since the moon's gravity is only one-sixth that of the earth, the lunar module would need to be at least 50 feet tall in order to reach lunar orbit.
What makes it particularly funny was that it appeared in the official Mensa journal. You know, club for super-geniuses. |
|
|||
|
Thanks for reminding us of that, Jay. I remember it was discussed at Apollohoax (in one of the now-deleted threads.
Weren't there some other stupid questions that were part of that same series? |
|
|||
|
The Lunar Rover's tires being filled with air. On the website it states, 'early photos clearly showing the air valves sticking out, ..anyone who didn't notice this needs to get their eyes checked'. (no LRV photos were displayed)
It goes on to say.. 'NASA was made aware of the oversight and quietly retouched ALL the public LRV photos'. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img] -Matt |
|
||||
|
The funniest claim I ever heard was the one about "Capricorn 1". Yeah, a movie made in 1978 proves the 1969 moon landing was faked.
One HB also claimed that a James Bond movie (Diamonds Are Forever, I think) has proof that Apollo was a hoax because in the movie Bond finds a movie set where they are faking a moon mission.
__________________
" We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard..." - John F. Kennedy TheSpaceRace.com |
|
|||
|
One of the most ridiculous I've heard is:
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...12-49-7278.jpg "Shadows visible in Al Bean's visor go off in various directions, not in straight parallel lines, as expected, suggesting that there is more than one light source." Have these people ever look into a fish-eye lens before? I guess not.
__________________
~AstroMike |
|
||||
|
My personal favorite is the one about blowing up the photographs in Photoshop, then looking at them on your screen with a magnifying glass. Look! You can see the buildings and stuff. See, they took aerial photographs and doctored them to look like lunar shots. But with my advanced use of Photoshop, their ruse crumbles like a house of cards!
This one still cracks me up.
__________________
Jeff Schwarz __________________________________________________ Argh!! They booby-trapped their sun!!****--Invader ZIM |
|
||||
|
People who think NASA could not have gone to the moon, but do believe that aliens are either there, or helped NASA get there. Or - they doubt the Apollo missions really happened, but do believe that a World War II Boeing B-29 somehow crash landed on the moon years ago (through a space vortex - sounds scientific doesn't it?) and NASA is hiding the pictures. (Saw that in National Enquirer several years ago) - the picture was actually of a rare Douglas B 19, all of which were accounted for. It was a big plane, but in the tabloid photo the wingspan covered the crater Tyco. Pretty big wings eh?)
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Chip on 2002-05-03 14:42 ]</font> |
|
|||
|
Quote:
But I think if I have to pick a specific claim as the funniest to me, it would be the Van Allen radiation belts are fatal to cross. The reason this one is so funny (to me, anyway, but we all know I'm warped [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif[/img] ) is that it is so very much a repeat, in form if not in detail, of the 19th-century arguments against the possibility of heavier-than-air flight or ground vehicles that go faster than about 30 mph (you won't be able to breathe, the speed of your movement will suck all the air away from you, you know). And yet, the Wright Brothers, Henry Ford and NASA seem to have done the impossible. "You can't do that" doesn't seem to have a great track record as an anti-technological argument. The (and you can't send messages from here to China in less than a second, either) Curtmudgeon |
|
|||
|
Here's the Mensa question thread we had here. Quite funny.
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/vi...ic=179&forum=3 I think I like all the claims about the LM the most. The rover that didn't fit, the door that was too small for the astronauts, the crater it should have left, the dust that should be on the landing pads, ad nauseum. I'm particularly fond of the claim that NASA crashed one of them during training while flying it in the Earth's atmosphere and gravity. How they managed that, we'll never know. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif[/img] [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_razz.gif[/img] [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]
__________________
...And that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be banana-shaped. --Sir Bedevere |
|
|||
|
Oh, and don't forget the coke bottle that lady in Australia saw on TV! That's gotta be right up there with the best.
__________________
...And that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be banana-shaped. --Sir Bedevere |