Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Conspiracy Theories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-August-2004, 03:32 PM
Kiwi Kiwi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 501
Default Charlie Duke's Flying Time, June 1969

The Apollo 11 Press Kit
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/A11_PressKit.pdf
says in the biography for Charlie Duke, "Has more than 24 (sic) hours flying time, most of which is jet time." Modern biographies say he has a total of 4,147 hours flying time, so the correct figure for June 1969 was possibly 2,400 hours. Can any BABBers please give the correct figure from another early biography?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-August-2004, 06:34 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,311
Default

The Apollo 16 Press Kit says 3,000 hours, so you're probably right about the 2,400 hours.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-August-2004, 09:30 AM
Kiwi Kiwi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 501
Default

Many thanks, ToSeek. I was hoping to avoid downloading the Apollo 16 Press Kit with my old Win95 system and 56k modem.

The reason I asked is that I found the Apollo 11 Press Kit such a brilliant resource, even without the diagrams, that I thought it could be useful to do a typescript in Word of just the text. Did some Googling to check whether I wouldn't just be reinventing the wheel, and couldn't find any, though I suspect that you may be able to show up my searching abilities.

Anyway, it's about three-quarters completed and could be perhaps useful for the BA to have available as a download for the few HBs that are actually interested in doing some research.

There are quite a few mistakes in the searchable text in the pdf file (see below **), and a few inconsistencies in layout, probably due to different typists working on the text. I hope to correct most of them.

It occurred to me today that the "24 hours" could have been the result of a keen typist changing it due to being told, "If it's for the general public, change 2400 hours to 24 hours," etc.

** E.g.: To search for every instance of "LM" you have to search for LM, I&l, IM, LFI, and LPI. In other cases Guidance = midance, Moon = Dioon, MSC = i4SC, and PGNS = ENS.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-August-2004, 10:54 AM
kucharek's Avatar
kucharek kucharek is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany, Old Europe
Posts: 4,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiwi
Many thanks, ToSeek. I was hoping to avoid downloading the Apollo 16 Press Kit with my old Win95 system and 56k modem.

The reason I asked is that I found the Apollo 11 Press Kit such a brilliant resource, even without the diagrams, that I thought it could be useful to do a typescript in Word of just the text. Did some Googling to check whether I wouldn't just be reinventing the wheel, and couldn't find any, though I suspect that you may be able to show up my searching abilities.

Anyway, it's about three-quarters completed and could be perhaps useful for the BA to have available as a download for the few HBs that are actually interested in doing some research.

There are quite a few mistakes in the searchable text in the pdf file (see below **), and a few inconsistencies in layout, probably due to different typists working on the text. I hope to correct most of them.

It occurred to me today that the "24 hours" could have been the result of a keen typist changing it due to being told, "If it's for the general public, change 2400 hours to 24 hours," etc.

** E.g.: To search for every instance of "LM" you have to search for LM, I&l, IM, LFI, and LPI. In other cases Guidance = midance, Moon = Dioon, MSC = i4SC, and PGNS = ENS.
That's what you get from OCR of a poor scan.

If you make the final thing into a PDF, I'm sure Eric, the editor of the ALSJ would be more than happy to put into the ALSJ. Please contact him when you're finished.

Harald
__________________
"Flying in space is risky business, but just staying on this planet is risky business too." - John Young, astronaut
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-August-2004, 02:15 PM
Mellow Mellow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,183
Default

Good call Harald, you can then use all those Acrobat search facilities from the PDF file.
__________________
There we were in the park when suddenly some old lady says I stole her purse..... I chucked the professor at her but she kept coming..... So I had to hit her with this purse I found.
-- Bender
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 13-August-2004, 06:02 AM
Kiwi Kiwi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 501
Default

If you make the final thing into a PDF...

No, the typescript of the Apollo 11 Press Kit will be a rich text file of the text only. Fairly small and useable with any word-processor. I'll certainly see if Eric Jones is interested in it.

Would anyone care to do a final check of my work?

Does anyone know whether there are any parts of the Apollo 11 Press Kit that didn't actually apply to the mission? One I noticed was that it has the wrong lens for the lunar surface Hasselblad.

On pages 154 - 157 is the ALRH (Apollo Lunar Radioisotopic Heater), which I know nothing about. Was this actually part of the mission?

Another thing I'd like if anyone can put me onto it, is a list of geologists etc. who investigated the Apollo 11 rocks in the first year or so. It would be good to relate it to the big list of investigators on pages 220-241. Also, putting names, locations, qualifications etc. to the scientists might help defeat the "faked rock" HBs.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 13-August-2004, 06:10 AM
kucharek's Avatar
kucharek kucharek is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany, Old Europe
Posts: 4,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiwi
If you make the final thing into a PDF...

No, the typescript of the Apollo 11 Press Kit will be a rich text file of the text only. Fairly small and useable with any word-processor. I'll certainly see if Eric Jones is interested in it.

Would anyone care to do a final check of my work?
Contact me when you're finshed.
Quote:
On pages 154 - 157 is the ALRH (Apollo Lunar Radioisotopic Heater), which I know nothing about. Was this actually part of the mission?
The passive seismic experiment used radioisotopic heaters to keep it warm during lunar night. Unfortunately, the PSE didn't made it through the night.

Harald
__________________
"Flying in space is risky business, but just staying on this planet is risky business too." - John Young, astronaut
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today