|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
You should have answered that many times... but what are the estimated levels for radiation absorption outside Van Allen belts?
I got some values from here, but they just talk about galactic cosmic rays. Are they close? Thanks. |
|
|||
|
As you've probably gathered from even a little reading, there isn't such a thing as "amount of radiation."
Much depends on the energy levels, kind of sheilding, kind of particle, time of exposure. For instance, you could stand near a pile of depleted uranium in total comfort. If you were daring, you could even EAT a handful. Most of the energy is released via Alpha particles that have too little oomph to penentrate your skin. But if you got any DU in your bloodstream, the stuff has a nasty habit of collecting in a few places so it can irradiate some of your internal organs at close range. Cosmic rays get mentioned a lot because their energies are very high; they can slam through light shielding and in metals give rise to secondary radiation (as I understand it...feel free to correct me, fellows!) The sun is better behaved, except during flares where the kinds of particles released changes and the amount increases radically.
__________________
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." |
|
||||
|
DU perhaps isn't the best example. It is very long lived. It is chemically useless to the body and so doesn't get absorbed. The result is that you'd have to eat a fair bit of DU before you suffered any ill effects. Radio-iodine, now that's a different story.
__________________
Freedom For Fission A breath of fresh Iodine-131 |
|
||||
|
That seems about right to me; most of the materials I use are graphs for certain kinds of exposures behind certain types and thicknesses of materials. That's really the kind of information we're interested in as engineers, but it doesn't mean much to someone who isn't contemplating building something. The numbers vary greatly depending on what conditions the compiler of the data has assumed. However, designing for longevity on the scale of years requires us to consider solar events, and so the average exposures according to many sources includes predicted numbers and strengths of these events.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Strontium-90 is a nasty one. Its a beta emitter that is chemically similiar to calcium, so it gets taken into your bones, and irradiates your bone marrow. Its a common component of radioactive fallout.
But anyhow - I was under the impression that the Apollo craft passed through the belts very quickly, minimising the dose received by the astronauts. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Howling from the Shadows It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. --- JayUtah You can't reason an irrational person out of an irrational belief. --- Noclevername Apollo: The History and the Hoax Enter the World of Athran |
|
||||
|
The different metals, chemically speaking, have different properties. Some, like plutonium and those other mentioned, behave like mercury and other heavy metals and stay in the body for long periods of time. Uranium, however, is eliminated and does not accumulate forever. It's still dangerous while it's in there, but the chemical effects are less pronounced. Yes, it would cause kidney failure (chemically) if ingested in sufficient quantities.
|