|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
I´m debating with a guy that went to NOAA database and found that, according to Helen Dodson Prince classification, there were a bunch of "significant", "important" and "major" flares during Apollo missions and, therefore, the astronauts should have suffered radiation sickness.
I wonder if the word "significant" means the same thing to people who were researching flares and to people who were trying to survive them. I also wonder why US government would let NOAA to calmly expose those data to public access if it were evidence of a fraud, and why no astrophysicist ever noticed or talked about that. I have an entrenched, science-illiterate HB that likes to read high-level stuff here and there, but will never ask questions or try to confirm his findings with specialists. Naturally, every misunderstanding becomes an "evidence" and it won´t accept apeals to common sense as an answer. I would like to learn more about the matter to write a direct answer. Could anyone help me? |
|
||||
|
I was listening to an archive recording of The Connection Where Phil appeared alongside Oberg and Rene
Rene mentions a book by John H Molden, "Prospects for Interstella Travel" and on page 225 says how lethal solar flares are (Not really up to transcribing it), ressurecting the radiation issue.
__________________
Fame, glory adventure, a cyber warrior craves not these things. |