Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Conspiracy Theories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-March-2005, 04:36 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,215
Default SMART-1 to the rescue

End of Conspiracy Theories? Spacecraft Snoops Apollo Moon Sites

Quote:
A European spacecraft now orbiting the Moon could turn out to be a time machine of sorts as it photographs old landing sites of Soviet robotic probes and the areas where American Apollo crews set down and explored.

New imagery of old Apollo touchdown spots, from the European Space Agency’s (ESA) SMART-1 probe, might put to rest conspiratorial thoughts that U.S. astronauts didn’t go the distance and scuff up the lunar landscape. NASA carried out six piloted landings on the Moon in the time period 1969 through 1972.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-March-2005, 05:22 PM
cyswxman's Avatar
cyswxman cyswxman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cheyenne,Wy - Like no place on Earth!
Posts: 1,566
Default

I'm sure they will claim any photographs were touched up. ](*,) ](*,)
__________________
"It's time to receive our missions from The Head."
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-March-2005, 06:10 PM
publiusr publiusr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,292
Default

I am more worried about the precident of Smart-1 myself:

http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...te_031028.html

It took forever for that probe to reach the moon. Once again, we focus too much on payloads, when we need to be building bigger rockets.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-March-2005, 06:38 PM
JayUtah's Avatar
JayUtah JayUtah is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,882
Default

It took forever, but it also used no more fuel than a mid-sized pickup truck in the transfer. The development of low-cost access to space destinations is crucial to developing it as a self-sustaining commercial enterprise. The lunar "slow boat" has commercial application, if it can be proved viable.

Obviously large boosters will also be required for other applications, but you don't criticize a tugboat or a sailboat simply because it's not a speedboat.
__________________
"Facts are stubborn things." --John Adams
Clavius Moon Base
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-March-2005, 06:45 PM
Doodler's Avatar
Doodler Doodler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 9,404
Send a message via AIM to Doodler Send a message via MSN to Doodler
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by publiusr
I am more worried about the precident of Smart-1 myself:

http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...te_031028.html

It took forever for that probe to reach the moon. Once again, we focus too much on payloads, when we need to be building bigger rockets.
Oh for crying out loud... Not every challenge in space exploration needs a bloody 30 story roman candle to solve it!! It didn't take 'forever' to reach the moon, it took precisely as long as projected within the operational requirements of the hardware. FYI, if you'd read beyond the performance specs, the ion engine used was a testbed for a maneuvering system in concept for exploring other planets. You may be able to hurl 50 plus tons of junk into orbit with your bloated boomtube, but if you're relying on that alone, you're going nowhere. Ion engine use is more than just specific impulse, its endurance and long term operational capacity as well.
__________________
I'm not completely heartless, the doctor who removed it told me he'd never be able to get it all.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-March-2005, 08:48 PM
The Bad Astronomer's Avatar
The Bad Astronomer The Bad Astronomer is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Posts: 7,175
Default

Doodler, you've been warned before about rude posts. I don't care if you disagree with publiusr, but you will do it politely, or you will be banned.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-March-2005, 08:57 PM
Doodler's Avatar
Doodler Doodler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 9,404
Send a message via AIM to Doodler Send a message via MSN to Doodler
Default

My apologies, I wasn't trying for rude, just emphatic. Just an admission now, this is one of three posts in the last 24 hours I've responded to in similar fashion. I don't completely disagree with his idea that a heavy lifter is important, just not its application as a cut and paste, solve it all solution to every possible mission. It just seemed like it was a repetitive answer handed down without consideration for the particulars of each case in which I replied. Believe me, these weren't meant as attacks on Publiusr, I tried to be absolutely careful to point my replies at the arguement.
__________________
I'm not completely heartless, the doctor who removed it told me he'd never be able to get it all.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-March-2005, 10:50 PM
Grogs1 Grogs1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 35
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyswxman
I'm sure they will claim any photographs were touched up. ](*,) ](*,)
We're having to bribe the ESA to keep quiet now too, in addition to the Russians, HAM Radio Operators, and of course everyone who allegedly worked for NASA? It's no wonder our national debt is so big. #-o

Seriously, if/when we ever return to the moon, we need to take several huge nuclear warheads and blow a big smiley face in the moon. I'd love the conspiracy theorists try and prove that away.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-March-2005, 11:08 PM
JayUtah's Avatar
JayUtah JayUtah is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,882
Default

Mass hallucinations from chemtrails. Duh.
__________________
"Facts are stubborn things." --John Adams
Clavius Moon Base
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-March-2005, 02:34 AM
jt-3d's Avatar
jt-3d jt-3d is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,759
Default

Forget the woowoos. They'll just say the images are fake and the ESA is now in on the hoax. I'd like to see some pics though.
__________________
You're a coward and a liar and a thOOF - Bart Sibrel
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-March-2005, 05:54 AM
RBG RBG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 416
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jt-3d
You're a coward and a liar and thOOF - Bart Sibrel
Sorry, sorry. Off on a tangent for a sec. Saw this signature and had my good laugh for this week. Maybe it's just late. I would have thought Sibrel would have been very honored to have been hit by a fist that had been to the moon.

RBG
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-March-2005, 01:27 PM
TriangleMan's Avatar
TriangleMan TriangleMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Qatar
Posts: 3,528
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grogs1
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyswxman
I'm sure they will claim any photographs were touched up. ](*,) ](*,)
We're having to bribe the ESA to keep quiet now too, in addition to the Russians, HAM Radio Operators, and of course everyone who allegedly worked for NASA? It's no wonder our national debt is so big. #-o
Since HBs dismiss all of the evidence from the original missions (rocks, photos, film, testimony of the people involved), a few pictures from the ESA isn't going to convince them. Heck, a lot of them still use "no stars" and "parallel shadow" arguements even though they are easily debunked by just going outside with a camera and taking a few photos.
__________________
Now while I might be amused by Cthulhians, I don't necessarily distrust them to carry out the functions of government. -- JayUtah

What's it like being a skeptic in the Middle East? Check out my blog.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-March-2005, 01:42 PM
Wolverine's Avatar
Wolverine Wolverine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 5,257
Send a message via MSN to Wolverine Send a message via Yahoo to Wolverine
Default

Bah, the conspiracists will concoct anything in order to maintain their beliefs, despite any and all evidence to the contrary. Just based on the first tidbits released from SMART-1, I can't wait to see what's in store as the mission moves forward. The probe's capabilities & instrumentation (given the relatively small size of both the craft and their budget) are quite impressive.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-March-2005, 03:15 PM
trob trob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 157
Default

Quote:
Given SMART-1’s initial high orbit, however, it may prove difficult to see artifacts, Foing explained. Using its ion engine, the probe has successfully spiraled down further to an altitude closer to the Moon.
Here we are, always talking about resolution, when all we needed to do was to talk about getting close to the object.
I come to think of an episode of Red dwarf - DNA - where Kryten the android has been changed into a human for a short time. He has some trouble sorting out the practicalities of humanity:

Kryten: Now then, uh, my optical system doesn't appear to have a zoom function.
Lister: No, human eyes don't have a zoom.
Kryten: Well then, how do you bring a small object into sharp focus?
Lister: Well, you just move your head closer to the object.

That has me laughing everytime.
Don't ask about the recharge socket...

LOL

All the best
Trob
__________________
second technician Rimmer, Arnold J., experienced what can only be described as a voyage to trip-out city
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-March-2005, 03:23 PM
TriangleMan's Avatar
TriangleMan TriangleMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Qatar
Posts: 3,528
Default

And don't go showing your mates double-polaroids! 8)
__________________
Now while I might be amused by Cthulhians, I don't necessarily distrust them to carry out the functions of government. -- JayUtah

What's it like being a skeptic in the Middle East? Check out my blog.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 05-March-2005, 03:39 PM
trob trob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 157
Default

I assumed that there was never enough thrust for those kinds of maneuvers in close lunar proximity. How much thrust does that little puppy have anyway. How far down can it actually go???
Hopefully close enough for a double polaroid of the landingsites LOL :wink:


By the way, Kryten ought to stay away from those appliance catalogues :wink:

All the best
Trob
__________________
second technician Rimmer, Arnold J., experienced what can only be described as a voyage to trip-out city
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 08-March-2005, 12:25 PM
Bozola's Avatar
Bozola Bozola is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 513
Default Re: SMART-1 to the rescue

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToSeek
End of Conspiracy Theories? Spacecraft Snoops Apollo Moon Sites

Quote:
A European spacecraft now orbiting the Moon could turn out to be a time machine...

New imagery of old Apollo touchdown spots, from the European Space Agency’s (ESA) SMART-1 probe...conspiratorial...U.S. astronauts didn’t go the distance and scuff up the lunar landscape...
What a woo-woo wil read. ESA has a time machine?

Mr. President, we cannot allow a time machine gap!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 08-March-2005, 12:39 PM
Nicolas's Avatar
Nicolas Nicolas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Belgium
Posts: 11,228
Default Re: SMART-1 to the rescue

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bozola
Mr. President, we cannot allow a time machine gap!
"I believe this nation should commit itself to building a time machine before the last decade was over!"
__________________
To the regular visitor of internet bulletin boards it is clear that it's an excellent idea your parents get to choose your real name.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 08-March-2005, 12:57 PM
R.A.F.'s Avatar
R.A.F. R.A.F. is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,081
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trob
How much thrust does that little puppy have anyway.
Not a lot. hold a piece of notebook paper in your hand and you'll get an idea of how little the actual thrust is. (That's assuming the same engine as used on Deep Space 1.)
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 08-March-2005, 02:26 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,215
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trob
How much thrust does that little puppy have anyway?

Quote:
Drawing electric power of 1350 watts from SMART-1's solar panels, the ion engine generates a thrust of 0.07 newton. That is equivalent to the weight of a postcard.
- http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/SMART-1/SEMYWBXO4HD_0.html
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 08-March-2005, 02:38 PM
R.A.F.'s Avatar
R.A.F. R.A.F. is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 7