Hi.

Any body got any infomation on the aliens on the moon?

I'm considering adding an artical to my site about it, to add to my moon hoax page.

Also could you please cite your sources please.

I dont want any porkies :^o

Note: I would prefer if i could get both sides of the story.

__________________
Conspiracy Cam

http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com
Find the truth

Which "both sides"? The dumb and the silly?

__________________
"Flying in space is risky business, but just staying on this planet is risky business too." - John Young, astronaut

That's easy.

One side says that there are aliens living on the moon, and the other says that that's a lot of dingo's kidneys.



I suppose the Hoax bit comes in with the mutterings of Hoagland, and others, who claim that NASA have systematically doctored Apollo's video and photographic records in order to hide the fact that they found aliens and alien structures when they landed on the moon.

The big question I would have with that is ... why would they do that? NASA is constantly talking about the potential for life on other planets and getting all excited when they find evidence of water anywhere.

If they found concrete (or crystal!) evidence of intelligent life on the moon, why on earth would they want to hide it?

__________________
Dave

Anyone seen my marbles? Anyone ... ?

Here's one (AS11-40-5951.jpg) before being retouched:

__________________
Home of the Illumi-Llama:
The Illuminati-R-Us Forums

Well...technically, there were aliens on the moon. Neil and Buzz for a start; any human on the moon is technically an alien there.

Excuse me, but isn't that self-contradictory. #-o

__________________
I believe that the taste of crow is not that of embarrassment, but rather that of education.

Try this site. Towards the bottom.

Amidst a universe of bizarre conspiracy claims, I find this one of the oddest. The claim is sometimes made that NASA "covers up" discoveries of alien life in order to drag out the search and thereby ensure continual funding from Congress. Rather, it seems to me that the surest way to get Congress to lose interest and cut NASA's budget is to continue to find little more than rocks and gullies carved by water 2 billion years ago.

Try this site as well:
http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/e...-directory.htm

and like the author says:"use caution and think carefully about accessing this evidence if you aren't prepared to risk experiencing a significant reality check." :-({|=

Any body got any infomation on the aliens on the moon?...

Note: I would prefer if i could get both sides of the story.

I hope you do - I'd like to hear what the aliens have to say.

Didn't Cosmic Dave have some ramblings about aliens on the Moon?

__________________
Now while I might be amused by Cthulhians, I don't necessarily distrust them to carry out the functions of government. -- JayUtah

What's it like being a skeptic in the Middle East? Check out my blog.

Sure, the standard Hoaglandish nonsense plus the alleged "code" transmissions from the moon (i.e., badly-mangled, naively-interpreted excerpts from the transcripts).

Right alongside his allegations that the Apollo astronauts found aliens on the moon is his allegations that they never went at all. He's got all his bases covered. :-)

__________________
"Facts are stubborn things." --John Adams
Clavius Moon Base

There's a saying that it's a mark of intelligence to be able to hold two diametrically opposed thoughts in your head at the same time.

But there's also a saying that there's an exception to every rule.

It's been so long since we've had a real Apollo HB here, though, I almost sorta miss ol' CosmicDave.

Basically, the story is very simple:

*The landing believes say the alien story is a woo woo story to give the cover up a reason with no evidence. They say we did land on the moon, but didn't release the pictures showing the alien structures.

*The woo woos say we did land on the moon, but didn't release the pictures showing the alien structures. More info, see Hoaglands Enterprise Mission.

Sorry, but there is really very little to say about this, as it is a completely wild claim without any evidence. The evidence used by Hoagland etc is the interpretation of mainly JPG artifacts as structures (he does this for mars pictures as well).

__________________
To the regular visitor of internet bulletin boards it is clear that it's an excellent idea your parents get to choose your real name.

__________________
Conspiracy Cam

http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com
Find the truth

These people so clutch at straws.

" [dramatic voice] Do you see the faint markings on the photo. I believe that this, is a ruin of a temple of a mighty and wealthy civalisation. [/dramatic voice]"

"Oh, it's not. I just spilled some tea there"


They just ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)

__________________
Conspiracy Cam

http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com
Find the truth

According to Hoagland, in his two volume series,



there was some document that expressed the concern as to how the evidence of extra-terrestrial life might cause problems with certain religious fundamentalist groups.

I got my copy of that video from my brother in law, who bought it thinking it was a normal video on astronomy. My sister tells how she was laughing her head off at it whilst my brother in law sat in shock as to what he had actually paid for

Edited to correct picture link

__________________
Fame, glory adventure, a cyber warrior craves not these things.

There's a document called the Brookings Report that was written when NASA was first formed. It's a very long document covering at length the implications of civilian space exploration. There are, I think, two mentions in there that the discovery of intelligent extraterrestrial life could be upsetting to certain establishments of our civilization. The woo-woos have latched onto this as evidence that NASA would cover up any such finding, even though they're the only ones who even seem to remember the Brookings Report any more.

__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

Yes he did. He says something along the lines of 'You can see evidence of the aliens on the moon in the photos taken by and the speech of Neil Armstrong, that was covered up to hide the aliens and the fact they didnt go to the moon anyway'! Well thats the general impression given by his site anyway

\/ nananana consistency \/

__________________
To the regular visitor of internet bulletin boards it is clear that it's an excellent idea your parents get to choose your real name.