Stanley Kubrick and the lunar landings - Page 3

djellison · #61 (**permalink**) 14-October-2009, 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CONSPIRACY REALIST

I do have proof the photographic record was faked, but I am not ready to present the evidence in it's entirety..

Then present your single best piece of evidence. A simple "This image is fake because...." with a link to an image. There are thousands and thousands of images, hours and hours of video and film footage. Given that you claim they are ALL fake - demonstrating must be very very easy.

I have now asked you this, directly, once in this thread, once in the Bart Sibrel's article thread and multiple times in your CONSPIRACY REALIST vs Apollo thread.

Answer it.

SolusLupus · #62 (**permalink**) 14-October-2009, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CONSPIRACY REALIST

I do have proof the photographic record was faked, but I am not ready to present the evidence in it's entirety.

Yet more sabre rattling? Who do you think you're impressing with your "eventually I'll prove you wrong, for now I'll just throw out random claims of righteousness"?

Quote:

Be patient,and in the meantime don't suffer me to ask any more questions until I am ready.

You're free to not ask any questions at all, far as I know. Answering them is a different issue.

Quote:

Take my word for it,

I haven't so far, why should I start now?

Quote:

there are plenty of similar examples to the one sited, and the another disqualification that completely discounts the possibility of any of the lunar surface photography being real. I am waiting for the results of a duplication of a scientific experiment I conducted to confirm my findings.

I await with bated breath.

CONSPIRACY REALIST · #63 (**permalink**) 14-October-2009, 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djellison

Then present your single best piece of evidence. A simple "This image is fake because...." with a link to an image. There are thousands and thousands of images, hours and hours of video and film footage. Given that you claim they are ALL fake - demonstrating must be very very easy.

I have now asked you this, directly, once in this thread, once in the Bart Sibrel's article thread and multiple times in your CONSPIRACY REALIST vs Apollo thread.

Answer it.

Is that a demand? You will find that I do not respond well to demands. Asking is one thing, saying 'answer it' has an entirely different tone.

CONSPIRACY REALIST · #64 (**permalink**) 14-October-2009, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SolusLupus

I haven't so far, why should I start now?

.

Because you have no ligitimate or logic reason to doubt my word. Have I lied to you yet?

SolusLupus · #65 (**permalink**) 14-October-2009, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CONSPIRACY REALIST

Is that a demand? You will find that I do not respond well to demands. Asking is one thing, saying 'answer it' has an entirely different tone.

If you make claims, you will deal with demands for evidence.

If you can't handle it, might I recommend you try to find a different venue for your ideas?

djellison · #66 (**permalink**) 14-October-2009, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CONSPIRACY REALIST

Is that a demand?

It's a reminder of the rules for this board.
Rules For Posting To This Board

Specifically, under rule 13

Quote:

Direct questions must be answered in a timely manner.

I do not demand you do anything. I suggest you follow the rules, which DO demand you answer questions if you wish to carry on posting on this forum.

So - again - my direct question

What evidence do YOU have that demonstrates the thousands of images, hours of video and film footage, lunar samples, radio signals from the moon and testimony of hundreds of thousands of engineers, scientists and the astronauts themselves - are ALL fake, as they must be if Apollo never happened.

By my count, this is about the 5th time I've asked the same direct question.

SolusLupus · #67 (**permalink**) 14-October-2009, 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CONSPIRACY REALIST

Because you have no ligitimate or logic reason to doubt my word. Have I lied to you yet?

You have been consistently disingenuous and evasive.

You claim superior knowledge that I do not believe you have.

You claim to credentials and expertise that you cannot demonstrate in any way.

So yes. Yes you have.

CONSPIRACY REALIST · #68 (**permalink**) 14-October-2009, 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djellison

It's a reminder of the rules for this board.
Rules For Posting To This Board

Specifically, under rule 13

I do not demand you do anything. I suggest you follow the rules, which DO demand you answer questions if you wish to carry on posting on this forum.

So - again - my direct question

What evidence do YOU have that demonstrates the thousands of images, hours of video and film footage, lunar samples, radio signals from the moon and testimony of hundreds of thousands of engineers, scientists and the astronauts themselves - are ALL fake, as they must be if Apollo never happened.

By my count, this is about the 5th time I've asked the same direct question.

"a timely manner' does not mean instantly, on demand.
I told him to be patient and he would get the evidence he requires.

CONSPIRACY REALIST · #69 (**permalink**) 14-October-2009, 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SolusLupus

You have been consistently disingenuous and evasive.

I have? When? I believe I clearly stated I was not prepared to present the evidence. How is it disingenuous or evasive that I refuse to capitulate to a demand to do so?

Quote:

Originally Posted by SolusLupus

You claim superior knowledge that I do not believe you have.

I believe it was Einstein that said that great spirits are despised by mediocre minds, or something to that effect.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SolusLupus

You claim to credentials and expertise that you cannot demonstrate in any way.

So yes. Yes you have.

In your opinion, which has thus far proved to be totally irrelevant to the issues.

tusenfem · #70 (**permalink**) 14-October-2009, 12:54 PM

CONSPIRACY REALIST, you are well advised to start answering questions that are posed to you in this thread (and others). You claim extraordinary things, but when asked to back them up with evidence you are quite lacking (in this thread and in others). This cannot be tolerated as it goes against the rules of the board.

Please, start answering the questions posed in detail, if not, you will suffer more time off.

tusenfem · #71 (**permalink**) 14-October-2009, 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CONSPIRACY REALIST

I believe it was Einstein that said that great spirits are despised by mediocre minds, or something to that effect.

Einstein also said about infinity, that the only things infinite are the universe and human stupidity, and he was not sure about the universe.

CONSPIRACY REALIST · #72 (**permalink**) 14-October-2009, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tusenfem

CONSPIRACY REALIST, you are well advised to start answering questions that are posed to you in this thread (and others). You claim extraordinary things, but when asked to back them up with evidence you are quite lacking (in this thread and in others). This cannot be tolerated as it goes against the rules of the board.

Please, start answering the questions posed in detail, if not, you will suffer more time off.

You need to read my last post to the thread titled 'conspiracy realist vs apollo", and take it seriously because I meant what I said, and can get more done than I think you realize. You've been given adequate warning, that is all I have to say at this time.

CONSPIRACY REALIST · #73 (**permalink**) 14-October-2009, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tusenfem

Einstein also said about infinity, that the only things infinite are the universe and human stupidity, and he was not sure about the universe.

That is a violation of the TOS. ban yourself.

CONSPIRACY REALIST · #74 (**permalink**) 14-October-2009, 01:02 PM

David E. Steitz
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-1730
david.steitz@nasa.gov

djellison · #75 (**permalink**) 14-October-2009, 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CONSPIRACY REALIST

David E. Steitz
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-1730
david.steitz@nasa.gov

Why are you posting the contact details for a NASA public affairs spokesman?

CONSPIRACY REALIST · #76 (**permalink**) 14-October-2009, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tusenfem

CONSPIRACY REALIST, you are well advised to start answering questions that are posed to you in this thread (and others). You claim extraordinary things, but when asked to back them up with evidence you are quite lacking (in this thread and in others). This cannot be tolerated as it goes against the rules of the board.

Please, start answering the questions posed in detail, if not, you will suffer more time off.

A hard head tempered only by an equally inflated ego can be detrimental to ones own best interests. DO NOT censor me again here based on fabricated violations of the rules. If I had said I was ready to present evidence, that would be an entirely different matter. I didn't.

CONSPIRACY REALIST · #77 (**permalink**) 14-October-2009, 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djellison

Why are you posting the contact details for a NASA public affairs spokesman?

It should be obvious, one would think.

djellison · #78 (**permalink**) 14-October-2009, 01:09 PM

Clearly it's not - or I wouldn't be asking.

Moose · #79 (**permalink**) 14-October-2009, 01:16 PM

As Conspiracy Realist has overstepped some very significant bounds in this thread and is no longer able to defend his assertions (even hypothetically speaking), I've closed this thread.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode