Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Conspiracy Theories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 27-May-2005, 02:38 AM
Peter B Peter B is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Oz, Down Under, Land of the Long Weekend
Posts: 1,431
Default Gemini to the Moon

I've been reading the article above at the Astronautix site.

It appears that there were a couple of plans to use a small open lunar module weighing only a couple of tons to land on the Moon.

Would this have been only a one-man LM?

What arrangements would have been made to get the astronaut(s) to the LM from the Gemini spacecraft? Would it have been a tethered spacewalk, with the astronaut strapping himself in, and then untethering from the Gemini?

Was the LM a one-stage or two-stage object? Any thoughts on the limits on experiments to be carried down or rocks to be carried up?

Any other technical problems people can see?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 31-May-2005, 08:43 AM
Peter B Peter B is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Oz, Down Under, Land of the Long Weekend
Posts: 1,431
Default

So, ah, no problems, then? :wink:
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 31-May-2005, 11:39 AM
DroneFour's Avatar
DroneFour DroneFour is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 50
Default

The 1968 movie "Countdown" centered around a very modified one-man Gemini lander going to the Moon. The plan was for it to land close to a previously launched shelter and the astronaut would stay there for a year until a Apollo mission would pick him up.
I want to rant about how that would be a bad idea, but it's just a movie.
__________________
If you can't convince them, confuse them.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 31-May-2005, 11:43 AM
kucharek's Avatar
kucharek kucharek is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany, Old Europe
Posts: 4,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DroneFour
The 1968 movie "Countdown" centered around a very modified one-man Gemini lander going to the Moon. The plan was for it to land close to a previously launched shelter and the astronaut would stay there for a year until a Apollo mission would pick him up.
I want to rant about how that would be a bad idea, but it's just a movie.
It's just a movie, but during the we-must-beat-the-soviets panic era, such proposals were seriously made, but luckily rejected.
__________________
"Flying in space is risky business, but just staying on this planet is risky business too." - John Young, astronaut
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 31-May-2005, 03:12 PM
scotsman scotsman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 126
Default

Lunar Surface Rendevous it was called... one of the less rational approaches to getting to the moon...


I do seem to remember that there was a semi-serious proposal to tweak the Gemini hardware to allow a Lunar mission to be atchieved before Apollo was ready. I never heard anything about a lightweight lander however

This would have been done using the Agena engine , in the manner of Gemini 10/11 and since the gemini vehicle had proven it could standd upto a 14 day mission - it seemed logical ... however Apollo as a better option in the long run
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-June-2005, 06:30 AM
DataCable DataCable is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kucharek
It's just a movie, but during the we-must-beat-the-soviets panic era, such proposals were seriously made, but luckily rejected.
"There is no way on God's Green Earth that we would ever, ever do anything like that." -FtEttM, ep. 5, "Spider"

8) Love that line.
__________________
"Earth diameter is 7,900 miles, and Moon diameter is 2,160 miles. It takes on average 90 minutes to complete one Earth orbit, so one Moon orbit should take roughly 25 minutes." - Sam "NasaScam" Colby

Bearer of the highly coveted "I found Venus in nine Apollo photos" sweatsocks.

DataCable^2008 A+
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-June-2005, 11:51 AM
Count Zero's Avatar
Count Zero Count Zero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 979
Default

Oddly enough, surface rendezvous is a centerpiece of Robert Zubrin's "Mars Direct" proposal.
__________________
"Transport of the mails, transport of the human voice, transport of flickering pictures - in this century, as in others, our highest accomplishments still have the single aim of bringing men together." St. Exupery
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-June-2005, 12:09 PM
kucharek's Avatar
kucharek kucharek is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany, Old Europe
Posts: 4,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Zero
Oddly enough, surface rendezvous is a centerpiece of Robert Zubrin's "Mars Direct" proposal.
But contrary to the moon scheme in the Sixties ("Bring him up and then we'll going to find out how we get him back"), with Mars Direct, a crew will only go on the trip when everything is already prepared and fine on Mars for the flight back.
__________________
"Flying in space is risky business, but just staying on this planet is risky business too." - John Young, astronaut
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-June-2005, 02:41 AM
Peter B Peter B is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Oz, Down Under, Land of the Long Weekend
Posts: 1,431
Default

http://www.astronautix.com/articles/bygemoon.htm

This was the source of my musings. Unfortunately, the diagrams aren't clear precisely what a Gemini LM would look like.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-June-2005, 04:26 PM
Moose's Avatar
Moose Moose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Maritimes
Posts: 7,485
Send a message via MSN to Moose
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DataCable
Quote:
Originally Posted by kucharek
It's just a movie, but during the we-must-beat-the-soviets panic era, such proposals were seriously made, but luckily rejected.
"There is no way on God's Green Earth that we would ever, ever do anything like that." -FtEttM, ep. 5, "Spider"

8) Love that line.
Yeah, that's priceless. While he's beating them over the head with that line, they're all blinking and sort of recoiling in time with the "ever EVER", almost like my cat does when she mistakingly sniffs at an orange peel.

That's first among my three favorite episodes of FtEttM, particularly for effective use of period music and lots of quotables.

"[Interrupts] John. John? Astronauts are smart. They'll figure it out."

"Bob, how much do these windows weigh?" "I dunno, couple ounces?" "Bob." "The real ones?" =D>
__________________
In Fallout 3, 'happiness' is a warm junkyard dog and a loaded gun. It's mostly the loaded gun.
- Moose's one-line review.

"your going to regret that one. You are now a colonoscope...
- Chrissy, corrupting PraedSt's wish.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-June-2005, 10:05 PM
Count Zero's Avatar
Count Zero Count Zero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 979
Default

"I hear Bolivia is really nice this time of year."
__________________
"Transport of the mails, transport of the human voice, transport of flickering pictures - in this century, as in others, our highest accomplishments still have the single aim of bringing men together." St. Exupery
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-June-2005, 10:55 PM
aurora's Avatar
aurora aurora is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,683
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kucharek
Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Zero
Oddly enough, surface rendezvous is a centerpiece of Robert Zubrin's "Mars Direct" proposal.
But contrary to the moon scheme in the Sixties ("Bring him up and then we'll going to find out how we get him back"), with Mars Direct, a crew will only go on the trip when everything is already prepared and fine on Mars for the flight back.
But landing in an exact spot is a difficult (and energy expensive) thing to do. I presume such plans count on being able to travel long distances, maybe in rovers, to reach cached resources.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-June-2005, 05:32 AM
kucharek's Avatar
kucharek kucharek is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany, Old Europe
Posts: 4,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aurora
Quote:
Originally Posted by kucharek
Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Zero
Oddly enough, surface rendezvous is a centerpiece of Robert Zubrin's "Mars Direct" proposal.
But contrary to the moon scheme in the Sixties ("Bring him up and then we'll going to find out how we get him back"), with Mars Direct, a crew will only go on the trip when everything is already prepared and fine on Mars for the flight back.
But landing in an exact spot is a difficult (and energy expensive) thing to do. I presume such plans count on being able to travel long distances, maybe in rovers, to reach cached resources.
Don't know which exactness is needed, but I think we are pretty good at landing where we want to land. When was the last landing that was waaay off the target? And this time the landing craft would be manned, has the biggest computer and most important, there surely would be radio beacons at the landing site.
And why would it be energy expensive? When you come in on the right trajectory and tweak your course early, there shouldn't be extra penalties in terms of fuel.

Harald
__________________
"Flying in space is risky business, but just staying on this planet is risky business too." - John Young, astronaut
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-June-2005, 05:35 AM
Kaptain K's Avatar
Kaptain K Kaptain K is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elgin, Tx
Posts: 7,581
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aurora
Quote:
Originally Posted by kucharek
Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Zero
Oddly enough, surface rendezvous is a centerpiece of Robert Zubrin's "Mars Direct" proposal.
But contrary to the moon scheme in the Sixties ("Bring him up and then we'll going to find out how we get him back"), with Mars Direct, a crew will only go on the trip when everything is already prepared and fine on Mars for the flight back.
But landing in an exact spot is a difficult (and energy expensive) thing to do. I presume such plans count on being able to travel long distances, maybe in rovers, to reach cached resources.
????????
Both rovers hit almost dead center of their predicted landing ellipses. A manned landing within walking distance of the shelter shoudn't be difficult!
__________________
Any day you wake up on "the right side of the dirt" is a good day.

T. Anderson
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-June-2005, 02:21 AM
DataCable DataCable is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moose
That's first among my three favorite episodes of FtEttM, particularly for effective use of period music and lots of quotables.
Yeah, lotsa deadpan banter on par with SG-1. The exchange I feel an almost overwhelming urge to quote any time discussion of the LM's appearance crops up:

"She's a beautiful machine, Tom!"
"You really think that thing's beautiful?"
"God no, it looks like a toaster oven with legs, but I'm not gonna tell him that."

(feeling the topic slowly slipping away...)
__________________
"Earth diameter is 7,900 miles, and Moon diameter is 2,160 miles. It takes on average 90 minutes to complete one Earth orbit, so one Moon orbit should take roughly 25 minutes." - Sam "NasaScam" Colby

Bearer of the highly coveted "I found Venus in nine Apollo photos" sweatsocks.

DataCable^2008 A+
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 05-June-2005, 04:20 PM
aurora's Avatar
aurora aurora is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,683
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaptain K
????????
Both rovers hit almost dead center of their predicted landing ellipses. A manned landing within walking distance of the shelter shoudn't be difficult!
I don't think a manned mission will use the Rover landing method, so it probably isn't directly comparable.

Also, the ellipses were many kilometers across.

They will have to have a solution in case they come down tens of kilometers from the target.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 08-June-2005, 10:34 PM
publiusr publiusr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,292
Default

The EELV approach is about as bad as Lunar Gemini.

No--worse.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today