|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
The thin line between success and explosion
Quote:
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling. |
|
|||
|
Publiusr, I'm not sure I understand your point. Are you referring to the Soviet test of the R-16 rocket that exploded on the pad killing around a hundred people, including Marshal Mitrofan Nedelin? If not, what were you referring to? If so, what has this to do with the topic?
The DVD being discussed is purely of US rocket launches, and not one of the failures on the DVD involved any loss of life or even, as far as I know, injury of a single person. It is quite acceptable to view huge explosions that destroy only hardware as 'fun'. They really are quite spectacular. I have the DVD in my collection. Its most revealing section shows that even 1960s US military organisations were producing terrible corporate films! Just watch some of them trying to deliver lines convincingly, or add dramatic visual styles to the delivery of dull information about range and types of missile!
__________________
"The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common: They don't alter their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views." The Doctor, Doctor Who: The Face of Evil. |
|
||||
|
Ah, the X-17, one of my favorites vehicles from the 1950s.
It was fun watching multi-stage solid rocketry develop through its growing pains. Plus it was a cool-looking rocket. When Estes components became available for custom models, the X-17 (along with the first generation Viking) was among my first attempts. The main problem was getting the upper stages to ignite, due to the distance between the motors. This was partially solved by using "spark tubes" to capture and direct the booster motor burn-out retro exhaust. The other problem was the strap-on spin-stabilization rockets. This was solved by eliminating the rockets and using fin warping to achieve the required roll. Of course, with the model, all the motor firings were during the climb phase. Plus no nuclear components were ever carried or detonated, unlike the real X-17. 8) Another X-17 link And another
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Transport of the mails, transport of the human voice, transport of flickering pictures - in this century, as in others, our highest accomplishments still have the single aim of bringing men together." St. Exupery |
|
|||
|
The Mike Oldfield "Space Movie" was put together to mark the 20th annivsery of Apollo 11, its basiclly a series of clips , some from apollo, some exploding rocket porn(!), all cut to Incantations Part 3 - if you get the new (ish) Mike Oldfield compliation DVD "Elements", the whole movie is there as an extra - really its pretty good, with some nice editing oif the images to the music
It became something of a holy grail for Oldfied fans ovber the years , since it appeared only once on UK TV . |