Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Conspiracy Theories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-July-2005, 05:01 AM
Superluminal's Avatar
Superluminal Superluminal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,411
Default A Closer Look, in 2008

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...htm?list144273
__________________
I'm not a scientist, but I play one on the internet.
http://www.rrac.org
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-July-2005, 10:54 AM
mathyou9's Avatar
mathyou9 mathyou9 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 228
Default

Quote:
The spacecraft's high-resolution camera, called "LROC," short for Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera, has a resolution of about half a meter. That means that a half-meter square on the Moon's surface would fill a single pixel in its digital images.

Apollo moon buggies are about 2 meters wide and 3 meters long. So in the LROC images, those abandoned vehicles will fill about 4 by 6 pixels.

What does a half-meter resolution picture look like? This image of an airport on Earth has the same resolution as an LROC image. Moon buggy-sized objects (automobiles and luggage carts) are clear:

Of course when these images come out, the HBs will claim that they are fake. I personally couldn't care less; I look forward to seeing half-meter-resolution pictures of the Apollo landing sites.
__________________
If only closed minds came with closed mouths!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-July-2005, 01:07 PM
Yorkshireman's Avatar
Yorkshireman Yorkshireman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 503
Default

I thought of a possible trap for some HB's here. Release the images, but without any amplifying comment. Just the raw images. Let woo-woos who habitually scour such images for 'artificial-looking' objects, find them first and claim they've found alien artifacts on the Moon. Then reveal where and what the images are of. If the Alien Artifact woo-woos are also Hoax Believers, they're checkmated.

(OK - there are so many ways this tactic could go wrong, it's probably not worth it! It was a thought though.)
__________________
"We need rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!"
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-July-2005, 10:58 PM
Donnie B.'s Avatar
Donnie B. Donnie B. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 5,278
Default

I like the way your mind works... sneaky :wink:

I wonder how much overlap there is between HBs and Aliens-on-the-Moon folks, though...
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 13-July-2005, 12:02 AM
JayUtah's Avatar
JayUtah JayUtah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,981
Default

But never underestimate the ability of someone to accuse or deny his way out of any such trap. They'll just doubt the real origin of the photos, or argue that the "anomalies" were inserted by you on purpose to fool them and discredit them, showing that you're an evil disinformationist. Nothing is impossible to the person whose mind is not burdened by having to cope with the real world.
__________________
"Facts are stubborn things." --John Adams
Clavius Moon Base
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 13-July-2005, 12:43 AM
Superluminal's Avatar
Superluminal Superluminal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,411
Default

I think that most of the woo woos believe we went to the moon, but NASA is hiding the fact they found: UFO bases, ancient ruins ect. :roll:
__________________
I'm not a scientist, but I play one on the internet.
http://www.rrac.org
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 13-July-2005, 09:33 AM
Yorkshireman's Avatar
Yorkshireman Yorkshireman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 503
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Superluminal
I think that most of the woo woos believe we went to the moon, but NASA is hiding the fact they found: UFO bases, ancient ruins ect. :roll:
Regrettably (for my cunning plan, that is,) I think you're right. The woo-woos seem to split into the Alien Ruins types, and the We Never Went types - which leads to the bizarre situation of Hoagland putting up a pair of (in many places quite well argued) Hoax debunking pages.
__________________
"We need rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!"
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 13-July-2005, 11:12 AM
PhantomWolf's Avatar
PhantomWolf PhantomWolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lost Deimos Moon Base
Posts: 5,663
Send a message via ICQ to PhantomWolf Send a message via AIM to PhantomWolf Send a message via MSN to PhantomWolf Send a message via Yahoo to PhantomWolf
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Superluminal
I think that most of the woo woos believe we went to the moon, but NASA is hiding the fact they found: UFO bases, ancient ruins ect. :roll:
I don't know, at least one way out there woo woo *cough*CosmicDave*cough* believes that Apollo was a hoax so we didn't actually go to the moon, but that the Apollo astronauts found alien bases when they got there. #-o :roll:
__________________
Howling from the Shadows

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. --- JayUtah

You can't reason an irrational person out of an irrational belief. --- Noclevername

Apollo: The History and the Hoax
Enter the World of Athran
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 14-July-2005, 03:40 AM
Superluminal's Avatar
Superluminal Superluminal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,411
Default

Ok, we found ancient ruins and UFO bases in the studio where the landings were faked? That makes sense.
__________________
I'm not a scientist, but I play one on the internet.
http://www.rrac.org
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 14-July-2005, 03:54 AM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,749
Default

. . . at least as much as any of these theories do.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 14-July-2005, 04:34 AM
PhantomWolf's Avatar
PhantomWolf PhantomWolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lost Deimos Moon Base
Posts: 5,663
Send a message via ICQ to PhantomWolf Send a message via AIM to PhantomWolf Send a message via MSN to PhantomWolf Send a message via Yahoo to PhantomWolf
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Superluminal
Ok, we found ancient ruins and UFO bases in the studio where the landings were faked? That makes sense.
See. Absolute proof that the studios were in Area 51, where else could have have Alien artifacts in them? Hmm, hmmm.

QED.

Of course they had to then fake the fake studio pictures because they had to remove the tell tale artifacts from them.
__________________
Howling from the Shadows

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. --- JayUtah

You can't reason an irrational person out of an irrational belief. --- Noclevername

Apollo: The History and the Hoax
Enter the World of Athran
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 14-July-2005, 05:40 PM
Graham2001's Avatar
Graham2001 Graham2001 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sailing cross the sun....
Posts: 461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yorkshireman
Quote:
Originally Posted by Superluminal
I think that most of the woo woos believe we went to the moon, but NASA is hiding the fact they found: UFO bases, ancient ruins ect. :roll:
Regrettably (for my cunning plan, that is,) I think you're right. The woo-woos seem to split into the Alien Ruins types, and the We Never Went types - which leads to the bizarre situation of Hoagland putting up a pair of (in many places quite well argued) Hoax debunking pages.
I have to agree there, the 'C' Rock Analysis, which, while not by Hoagland, is part of that collection is up to anything written by Phil or Jay. That is except for the last bit about NASA still hiding something.

I find that the whole set is a perfect example of how woo-woos can hold contradictory views. In the example page its clear that NASA was very helpful but are still seen as not having admitted 'the Truth'.
__________________
We all know those Venusians: Doing their hair in shock waves, smoking electrical coronas, wearing Van Allen belts and resting their tiny elbows on a Geiger counter...

John Sladek, The New Apocrypha, pg 34.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 14-July-2005, 08:08 PM
Eirik's Avatar
Eirik Eirik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lake Stevens, WA
Posts: 215
Default

The alien ruins tpyes annoy me, because the argument makes no sense.

If NASA thought for a moment that they had found alien ruins on the moon (or Mars), what better way to become the best funded agency in the US? Even if they kept it all a secret from all but the President and a handful of others, there is no way that they would be fighting for money at this point, and no way they'd be working on earth orbit craft when the real prize was on the moon.

Even if they did their darndest to keep it a secret, NASA would have built larger moon craft, bases, rovers, etc, just to get more men and machines to the moon to look over the alien ruins. They might have used the cover of scientific research, but they'd be going.

And that would negate all of the reasons that are used against manned exploration. If we really couldn't send men to the moon because of the danger, we'd have sent about 1000 automated cameras and rovers just to look at the alien craft/buildings/ruins/etc.

Or am I just off base here? :-?
__________________
"Kittens give Morbo gas." -- Morbo the Newscaster, Futurama
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 14-July-2005, 08:19 PM
jfribrg jfribrg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: 40N 75W mag 4.1 sky at best
Posts: 1,229
Default

You're not off base, but in general these "what if" and "for the sake of argument" types of arguments are not very persuasive, because they assume that people always make rational decisions. Sometimes intelligent well intentioned people make bad decisions, and you would in effect need to prove that this was not the case. In any case, the woo-woos can selectively claim that NASA is collectively too stupid to fake the landings without leaving tell-tale traces, or so smart that they were able to eliminate the "smoking gun" type evidence.
__________________
Yo Adrian. The Phillies won the Series.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 15-July-2005, 02:05 AM
Donnie B.'s Avatar
Donnie B. Donnie B. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 5,278
Default

I believe that some of the Aliens-on-the-Moon folks say that we are back on the Moon, in secret, using alien technology.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 15-July-2005, 03:05 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donnie B.
I believe that some of the Aliens-on-the-Moon folks say that we are back on the Moon, in secret, using alien technology.
Back? We never left! There's been a human presence there ever since the Nazis used alien technology to establish a military base there during World War II!!!

[/woo-woo mode]
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 21-July-2005, 04:13 PM
Grey's Avatar
Grey Grey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yorkshireman
...which leads to the bizarre situation of Hoagland putting up a pair of (in many places quite well argued) Hoax debunking pages.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Hoagland
In fact, most of the charges made, not just by Collier and Percy, but by others who have picked up the mantle of their assertions, are so absurd, so easily discredited, so lacking in any kind of scientific analysis and just plain common sense that they give legitimate conspiracy theories -- like ours -- a bad name.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 21-July-2005, 09:57 PM
Samara's Avatar
Samara Samara is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In a well
Posts: 330
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yorkshireman
...which leads to the bizarre situation of Hoagland putting up a pair of (in many places quite well argued) Hoax debunking pages.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Hoagland
In fact, most of the charges made, not just by Collier and Percy, but by others who have picked up the mantle of their assertions, are so absurd, so easily discredited, so lacking in any kind of scientific analysis and just plain common sense that they give legitimate conspiracy theories -- like ours -- a bad name.
I could take the HB turning NASA into a conniving monster, but making conspiracy theorists seem absurd, easily discredited, and lacking in any kind of common sense? That is just low :roll:
__________________
here we go, the world is spinning
when it stops, it's just beginning

sun comes up, we laugh and we cry
sun goes down, and then we all die

Touched by his noodly appendage
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today