1 Synodic . . 29.530588 New2New + getting longer? more slowly?
2 Anomalistic 27.554550 perigee to perigee
3 Sidereal . .27.321662 with respect to the fixed stars. probably SAME
<a name="2-11-05.LCP"> page 2-11-05.LCP aka Lunar Cyclic periods
when I watched the redshift tour of the moon
{um 1 day + 1hr increamintal} that in the
distant past history of the lunar orbit
there existed a time frame such that one lunar orbit
{?28 days} phase locked with ONE EARTH spin
{link to that Emperhsis?}{{unlikly}}

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-11-05 11:39 ]</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-11-05 18:35 ]</font>

In Redshift? No way.

<a name="2-11-05.123"> page 2-11-05.123 aka 1,2,3-
On 2002-11-05 10:41, GrapesOfWrath wrote: To? 8:50 A.M.
In Redshift? No way.
I mean the CD "RedShift" from Meris?
I have no idea why this simple stuff
proves so difficult for me to find
TRY this?
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/vi...=25#2-10-20.MM

http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/vi...25#2-10-23.4LC

Is it this Redshift? O yeah I see a version by Maris Multimedia.

<a name="JD2452582.4RS"> page JD2452582. aka 4REDSHIFT
On 2002-11-05 12:36, GrapesOfWrath wrote: To? HUb's 386
Is it this Redshift? O yeah I see a version by Maris Multimedia.
[/quote]most likely? November 3, 2002 actually todays the FIFTH but my 386 also has suffered see next post?

<a name="20021105.TC"> page 20021105.TC aka Time Check
On 2002-11-05 18:02, HUb' wrote: To? HUb'
.1 the "redshift" CD i have says Ver 1.2 ? 1993-94
anyway at 3 I turned on the 386 and saw a
report that the date was not set?
---hmm? I seldom ever have any trouble with the 386
it humms along and behaves well ? not the same story as the 486
SO I reset the date and the Time
which throws off my long term
dT_c (computer time drift) as compared to uct
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/vi...&0#20021105.TD

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-11-07 11:09 ]</font>