BTW I have posted a link to the first part of your movie, here on Apollo Hoax

__________________
Moderations in purple

Fame, glory, adventure, a cyber warrior craves not these things.

To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post:
─────────────────────────────────────────────
◄ Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄ Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice ►

Yeah I know what you mean. My narrator is synthetic, but at least he works cheap. :-)

I don't have much of a voice for narration or I'd have done it myself. Hey maybe for the next one I'll hire that British chick from Sibrel's videos. The authoritative nature of her voice seems to lull the NaNa's into some kind of blind allegiance mode, where facts and empirical data mean nothing.

She's good!

__________________
Apollo unbelievers go here for immediate salvation:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khDI2MsWSYc

"I had a hand in Tom Morrow's kiester."
-JayUtah

"The only physical proof nasa has that they landed men on the moon is 840 lbs. of rocks"
-straydog02

Hey, cool! Thanks sticks.

__________________
Apollo unbelievers go here for immediate salvation:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khDI2MsWSYc

"I had a hand in Tom Morrow's kiester."
-JayUtah

"The only physical proof nasa has that they landed men on the moon is 840 lbs. of rocks"
-straydog02

So from a furniture mover's POV who would win in a fight between the BA and Bart? Wait! Didn't Bart get beat up by an 70 year old astronaut? Never mind...

__________________
In your rush to call everyone "entrenched" or closed-minded or "limited" you fail to note that the "limit" here has a very natural boundary: that point at which the evidence stops. - JayUtah

Science fiction was never meant to be an educational tool. - Editor Amazing Tales