|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Bluecoat is a service that categorizes websites. You can get software that will read their categorizations and block browsers on your computer (or network) from accessing inappropriate sites. For example, from this office I can't get to pornographic, hacker-related, or political websites because they're blocked (or, more precisely, sites that have been categorized as such, correctly or not).
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling. |
|
||||
|
Okay, I use Roadrunner, and this is slightly peeving me off. I use it here in Corpus Christi, TX, and so far I've loved how fast and effective it is, and how low my problems have been.
To hear that they would censor anything irks me. An entire ISP deciding what to censor and what not to censor makes me irritated, especially when I'm 20, nearing the age of 21, and I should be able to view practically anything I wish to (limited at Rights to Privacy, of course). If I want to look at anything pornographic, I should be able to. If I want to look at guns, whether to buy (legally), sell (legally), or look over histories of (I doubt I could do this illegally), I should be able to. This is incredibly disheartening news, and seems slightly fascist (though instead of the government telling you what you can and can't look at or do, it's a corporation). Bah, sorry for the minor rant here, I'm not really adding anything besides an editorial, but I had to pipe up.
__________________
"A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong gives it a superficial appearance of being right." -- Thomas Paine Being intelligent is not a felony. But most societies evaluate it as at least a misdemeanor. -- Heinlein Creationists make it sound as though a "theory" is something you dreamt up after being drunk all night. -- Isaac Asimov |
|
||||
|
It is about time someone started policing the web
Pornography degrades all who touch it, funds terrorism and may bring the final apocolypse What we need now is some decent software that will block those obscene news items that criticise the government. Criticising the government is running the country down and a blow to morale. We have seen what these so called free thinkers do, drugs, rock and roll, free love. It is time to put an end to this pernicious cancer once and for all. Censorship is your friend, you will love and adore it It was good to here that Yahoo has been helping catch serious offenders in China (see here) Wow I just managed to keep a straight face there spouting that lot off ![]()
__________________
Van Rijn's original Invisible Elf was running for the North Carolina Senate, but dropped out of the contest after the paparazzi snapped him with a cute pixie just outside Disney World in Florida. Now he has settled down with her as they await their first child, writing his biography of life in Van Rijn's backyard, - Now you prove me wrong |
|
||||
|
Are you sure that this isn't fall-out from the Level3-Cogent dispute? I've see Roadrunner customers complaining about large pieces of the Net being unreachable.
Cogent Network Status Date: 10/06/2005 Quote:
Quote:
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... |
|
||||
|
I personally think it is the cogent/level 3 thing, but since Alex loves to rant und rave, I could not resist putting this up....
Alex has a so called camp listed in Arab Alabama, I live near that town, so I did some checking.....Wal Mart Area Distribution Center...passed off as a camp in a Sat.Pix... So I have no faith in his rants anymore, btw: Later he claimed that Wal Mart is in on it, and part of the grand plot.... Dale
__________________
"Ad astra per aspera" |
|
|||
|
For what it's worth...
I implemented the web filtering solution at the rather large corporation where I work, so I've got quite a bit of experience with them. You can generally get around any category-based web filter by using a web proxy. Since web proxies include translation sites (like babelfish) it is unlikely that RoadRunner has blocked these. On the other hand, if they're using some sort of active content-based filter that wouldn't work--but since it's rather difficult to imagine what sort of keywords would indicate "controversy", I doubt they're doing that. This seems very odd to me. What would make an ISP decide to block its users from wide swaths of the web? It seems like that would serve only to give advantage to their competitors.
__________________
That's not an astronaut, it's a TV comedian! And he was just using space travel as a metaphor for beating his wife. |
|
|||
|
I noticed some on GLP talking about this. Some people replied that they were on Roadrunner and weren't having problems. It seems like it might just be a regional thing. This could have been one person's decision to block these sites. Most likely it will be reversed soon as people complain about it.
Frankly, I don't see it as a big loss.
__________________
"Eternal vigilance is the price of supremacy" ------------Mark Twain "Women are like Voltron. The more you can hook up, the better it gets." |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Transport of the mails, transport of the human voice, transport of flickering pictures - in this century, as in others, our highest accomplishments still have the single aim of bringing men together." St. Exupery |
|
||||
|
Roadrunner is my ISP, and I cannot access the site(s) in question. Hopefully this is simply a result of the aforementioned dispute. I loathe Jones and his tiresome, nonsensical PCT claims, and generally have no desire to visit his website (unless I'm interested in viewing something specific for debunking purposes). If RR attempted to arbitrarily decide what I can or cannot view, I'd drop them in a heartbeat even if it meant going back to dial-up.
|
|
||||
|
i would tend to agree that it is more likely the level 3/cogent issue. the ISP is not liable for content you choose to view at home, so they have no reason to limit your access. i had roadrunner when in florida (via cable modem) and never had any issues.
taks
__________________
goodbye richard pryor :(... |
|
|||
|
I thought AOL was the worst offender by far in this respect...can someone tell me about what AOL does? I heard it's not actually the web, but their own little world, with only approved sites and so on...Is that true? Personally , I don't care for AOL's advertising methods and would never use them as an ISP
Pete
__________________
PJE There's so much I don't know about astrophysics. I wish I had read that book by that wheelchair guy. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
It started back in the 1980s, when home-accessible networks were being developed outside of ARPANet. Others of this ilk were Prodigy and CompuServe. When the net was opened up in 1995, these providers managed to hang on by claiming special content and services. An aggressive and often deceptive advertising campaign by AOL, banking on the general ignorance of the American public about the WWW in particular and computers in general, paid off. What was really hilarious about these three was during 1995, before they became de facto ISPs, they claimed to provide a user with "net access", but only to their own proprietary domains, which were inaccessible to non-AOL, etc., net surfers. Why AOL is still is business was best described by H.L. Mencken many years ago, Quote:
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document. |