Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Conspiracy Theories
Reload this Page I Will Prove The Moon Landings Were Hoaxed
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Closed Thread
Page 4 of 58 < 123 4 5671454 > Last »
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #91 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2005, 04:00 PM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 7,982
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moon Man
Hello again and thanks for the welcome Kiwi. I haven't even began to give my original proof. I expected to be trolled so I thought it best to let the trolls get there kicks in before I start. I'm one person and getting responses from 10 or more. I encorage that but it's nearly impossible to keep up.
10? I think it's closer to 6 billion

But it's page five, and you started the thread. Let's hear it! I've got 70 8th graders wanting to know.
  #92 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2005, 04:01 PM
Moon Man's Avatar
Moon Man Moon Man is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 307
Default
What kind and how many batteries were used on the Apollo rovers..?

What kind of batteries were used in the back packs on the astro-nots..?

Did they have heaters built in them or just air conditioning..?

How much pressure was inside the spacesuits and how were they pressurized in the lunar lander prior to walking on the moon..?
  #93 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2005, 04:02 PM
kucharek's Avatar
kucharek kucharek is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany, Old Europe
Posts: 4,052
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMV
I can recommend some websites where you can start:
Apollo Flight Journal
Apollo Lunar Surface Journal
Apollo Saturn Reference Page
And some others at NASA History Division
NASA History Publications On-Line
NASA History Topical Index
I guess, Apollo by the Numbers should help him, too, as he hasn't even the simplest figures at hand (except for 10000lbs and 3000lbs).

Just a troll's suggestion.
__________________
"Flying in space is risky business, but just staying on this planet is risky business too." - John Young, astronaut
  #94 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2005, 04:03 PM
Draconis's Avatar
Draconis Draconis is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 90
Default
Why are you listing nomenclature? While the Devil is in the details, those details really don't support your case. It's just a part's list.
__________________
Rest enough for the individual man -- too much, and too soon -- and we call it death. But for Man, no rest and no ending. He must go on, conquest beyond conquest. First this little planet with its winds and ways, and then all the laws of mind and matter that restrain him. Then the planets about him and at last out across immensity to the stars. And when he has conquered all the deeps of space and all the mysteries of time, still he will be beginning.
  #95 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2005, 04:04 PM
kucharek's Avatar
kucharek kucharek is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany, Old Europe
Posts: 4,052
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moon Man
What kind and how many batteries were used on the Apollo rovers..?

What kind of batteries were used in the back packs on the astro-nots..?

Did they have heaters built in them or just air conditioning..?

How much pressure was inside the spacesuits and how were they pressurized in the lunar lander prior to walking on the moon..?
[Harald, shaking head in disbelief]
__________________
"Flying in space is risky business, but just staying on this planet is risky business too." - John Young, astronaut
  #96 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2005, 04:05 PM
jrkeller's Avatar
jrkeller jrkeller is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Houston near the Johnson Space Center
Posts: 2,655
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moon Man
They allegedly only used 3000 lbs thrust on Apollo 11 and had a 10,000 lb thuster on the lander. This was the first mission so how did they know they could get away with only using 3000 lbs of thrust when NASA designed the lander to use 10,000 lbs..?
You are correct in stating that only 3000 lbs of thrust was needed for landing. The larger engine thrust is needed to de-orbit the LM and since the LM burns fuel, it need more thrust when it is full of fuel then when it lands and has burned most of it fuel.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moon Man
How must tempature/heat does 3000 lbs of thrust create..?
What I think you are trying to say is how hot do the LM descent exhaust gasses get. The reason I say this is because every rocket engine type is different. Different designs produce maximum temperatures, different fuels produce different temperatures, etc. Furthermore, the temperature of the exhaust gasses is variable, depending on the location you choose within the nozzle.

If you mean, what is the temperature of the gasses exitting the rocket engine, it was around 2600 F (IIRC).

BTW temperature and heat are not the same thing.
  #97 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2005, 04:07 PM
jrkeller's Avatar
jrkeller jrkeller is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Houston near the Johnson Space Center
Posts: 2,655
Default
Oops,

I forgot this. I was 7 1/2 when Apollo 11 landed on the moon. Watched most of the EVA.

I followed all of the Apollo launches from 7 through 17.
  #98 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2005, 04:12 PM
Jakenorrish's Avatar
Jakenorrish Jakenorrish is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cardiff UK
Posts: 1,098
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moon Man
Hello everyone. My name is Moon Man. Feel free to welcome me to this site.

I am here to prove that NASA did not land on the moon nor did any man ever orbit it. In the coming days, weeks and months I will post the evidence that once and for all exposes the Great Lunar Lie.

Ok Moon Man, you got me, I was wrong about one thing. I will once more post in this thread. I will rewrite your first message by showing you how it should read...

Hello everyone. My name is Moon Man. Feel free to welcome me to this site. Not that I deserve it as I have never taken an interest in astronomy prior to stumbling across your site today.

I watched the Fox programme on the Apollo moon landings hoax therefore I am here to prove that NASA did not land on the moon nor did any man ever orbit it. In the coming days, weeks and months (it'll take that long I'm afraid as I posess no grasp of the laws of Physics or any knowledge at all of the basic facts of the Apollo missions) I will post absolutely no evidence that once and for all exposes the Great Lunar Lie as I imagine it.
__________________
Of all the things I've ever lost, I miss my mind the most!
  #99 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2005, 04:15 PM
Moon Man's Avatar
Moon Man Moon Man is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 307
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrkeller
You are correct in stating that only 3000 lbs of thrust was needed for landing. The larger engine thrust is needed to de-orbit the LM and since the LM burns fuel, it need more thrust when it is full of fuel then when it lands and has burned most of it fuel.



What I think you are trying to say is how hot do the LM descent exhaust gasses get. The reason I say this is because every rocket engine type is different. Different designs produce maximum temperatures, different fuels produce different temperatures, etc. Furthermore, the temperature of the exhaust gasses is variable, depending on the location you choose within the nozzle.

If you mean, what is the temperature of the gasses exitting the rocket engine, it was around 2600 F (IIRC).

BTW temperature and heat are not the same thing.
Thanks for the links and facts everyone. I will take it that the facts cited are indeed correct.

How did Houston know on earth how much fuel was remaining in the lander..?

Please don't say because they were monitoring it, I want to know how they were monitoring it.

Also, even without a flame coming from the lander upon landing it was still producing a tempature of 2600 F, which would melt rock, therefore, why is there no crater or melted rock under the lander but just loose dust..?
  #100 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2005, 04:17 PM
Maksutov's Avatar
Maksutov Maksutov is offline
Honored Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fifth corner of the Earth
Posts: 16,731
Default Re: I Will Prove The Moon Landing Were Hoaxed
As I wrote earlier, another dead-end CT thread.

It's become readily apparent this HB/CTer has nothing new to offer and isn't worth the time or effort.

Meanwhile, got to put together the first post for an "Apollo Memories" thread.
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.
  #101 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2005, 04:17 PM
captain swoop's Avatar
captain swoop captain swoop is online now
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,045
Default
What temp do you think the exhaust of a Harrier is? why is there no melted rock underneat hone when it lands?
__________________
'The eye can only see what the mind is prepared to accept'
  #102 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2005, 04:22 PM
kucharek's Avatar
kucharek kucharek is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany, Old Europe
Posts: 4,052
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by captain swoop
What temp do you think the exhaust of a Harrier is? why is there no melted rock underneat hone when it lands?
Because it lands on the lawn?


SCNR
__________________
"Flying in space is risky business, but just staying on this planet is risky business too." - John Young, astronaut
  #103 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2005, 04:22 PM
Draconis's Avatar
Draconis Draconis is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 90
Default
Ok, folks. Nothing here to see. Move along, move along...

[covering up tired old carcass of Moon Hoax accident victim]
__________________
Rest enough for the individual man -- too much, and too soon -- and we call it death. But for Man, no rest and no ending. He must go on, conquest beyond conquest. First this little planet with its winds and ways, and then all the laws of mind and matter that restrain him. Then the planets about him and at last out across immensity to the stars. And when he has conquered all the deeps of space and all the mysteries of time, still he will be beginning.
  #104 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2005, 04:23 PM
Moon Man's Avatar
Moon Man Moon Man is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 307
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jakenorrish
Ok Moon Man, you got me, I was wrong about one thing. I will once more post in this thread. I will rewrite your first message by showing you how it should read...

Hello everyone. My name is Moon Man. Feel free to welcome me to this site. Not that I deserve it as I have never taken an interest in astronomy prior to stumbling across your site today.

I watched the Fox programme on the Apollo moon landings hoax therefore I am here to prove that NASA did not land on the moon nor did any man ever orbit it. In the coming days, weeks and months (it'll take that long I'm afraid as I posess no grasp of the laws of Physics or any knowledge at all of the basic facts of the Apollo missions) I will post absolutely no evidence that once and for all exposes the Great Lunar Lie as I imagine it.
See, I was right, you're back.

I never saw the FOX show.

No one anywhere has ever argued what I will argue when I'm ready. A good lawyer, like me, always gets the hostil expert witnesses to commit to there position before he tears them apart, hence, my comment that I will post the evidence in the coming days, weeks and months. I didn't know how active this site was when I joined. Given that it's rather busy the experts should be able to post facts to my questions today or tomorrow, hopefully.

Where are all these experts..?

Try answering some of my previously cited questions, please.
  #105 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2005, 04:23 PM
R.A.F.'s Avatar
R.A.F. R.A.F. is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,081
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moon Man
What kind and how many batteries were used on the Apollo rovers..?

What kind of batteries were used in the back packs on the astro-nots..?

Did they have heaters built in them or just air conditioning..?

How much pressure was inside the spacesuits and how were they pressurized in the lunar lander prior to walking on the moon..?
While questions are always welcome here, I don't see the point of you asking them in such a "scatter-gun" fashion. Are the "batteries" a/the reason that you think the Moon landings were faked? Do you think that the spacesuit systems were not sufficient to provide life support, power, etc.?

It's not really a discussion if I have to "guess" what you are thinking...
  #106 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2005, 04:27 PM
AstroSmurf's Avatar
AstroSmurf AstroSmurf is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,031
Send a message via ICQ to AstroSmurf
Default
Read up on the difference between heat and temperature.
__________________
"We do not require reality to conform to the expectations of the ignorant"
  #107 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2005, 04:30 PM
Moon Man's Avatar
Moon Man Moon Man is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 307
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by R.A.F.
While questions are always welcome here, I don't see the point of you asking them in such a "scatter-gun" fashion. Are the "batteries" a/the reason that you think the Moon landings were faked? Do you think that the spacesuit systems were not sufficient to provide life support, power, etc.?

It's not really a discussion if I have to "guess" what you are thinking...
The amazing NASA batteries are not the only issue I will be addressing but it is a give away that this was all a hoax.
  #108 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2005, 04:32 PM
Alan G. Archer's Avatar
Alan G. Archer Alan G. Archer is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tualatin, OR
Posts: 276
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhantomWolf
Well given that it's nearly 5am I'm ging to bed, even though this thread is a little like watching a train wreak. I'm sure it'll provide plenty of screams and frustrated head banging for me tomorrow as I read through the wreakage.
Or the original proof...
  #109 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2005, 04:32 PM
Draconis's Avatar
Draconis Draconis is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 90
Default
Look, MoonMan, you're not posting anything useful to support your claim.

You state you're a Juris Doctor. Does one begin to ramble about the color of the sky or the number of flowers present, when leading into a Capital Murder case?

Start posting some relevant questions and/or facts, please.

__________________
Rest enough for the individual man -- too much, and too soon -- and we call it death. But for Man, no rest and no ending. He must go on, conquest beyond conquest. First this little planet with its winds and ways, and then all the laws of mind and matter that restrain him. Then the planets about him and at last out across immensity to the stars. And when he has conquered all the deeps of space and all the mysteries of time, still he will be beginning.
  #110 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2005, 04:34 PM
Extravoice's Avatar
Extravoice Extravoice is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Democratic People's Republic of New Jersey
Posts: 724
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Draconis
Ok, folks. Nothing here to see. Move along, move along...

[covering up tired old carcass of Moon Hoax accident victim]
Extravoice sighs and slowly shakes his head from side to side. Then he turns and shuffles away in disappointment.

[/Bob_Dole_mode]
  #