Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > The Proving Grounds > Conspiracy Theories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 14-November-2005, 01:25 AM
Alberto Alberto is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 16
Default Aldrin Said That a UFO Accompanied The Apollo 11 Mission?

I've come across this. It looks phony to me, but do you have more information about it?

http://frankwarren.blogspot.com/2005...companied.html

" Thirty-six years after the event, astronaut Buzz Aldrin the second man who stepped on Earth’s natural satellite confessed that he saw a UFO next to the Apollo 11 space ship.

Aldrin presented/displayed a video segment 3.5 minutes long while on approach to the moon on the Science television channel. In the tape a very strange object appears, and accompanies the Apollo ship.

Agencia IN / Science Channel – 15/10/05"

http://www.agenciain.com.ar/note.php?n=1604

It is an argentinian news agency... any clue?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 14-November-2005, 01:54 AM
peter eldergill peter eldergill is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,754
Default

A UFO only means unidentified. Doesn't mean it's an alien ship

Pete
__________________
PJE

There's so much I don't know about astrophysics. I wish I had read that book by that wheelchair guy.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 14-November-2005, 02:14 AM
Alberto Alberto is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 16
Default

Hi Pete! Yeah, I think it is the old story of the S-IVB. (Was it the S-IVB?)
But I wonder if Aldrin really said that in october and if he "presented/displayed a video segment 3.5 minutes".
I mean, why now? I've searched in the Science Channel and found nothing about it. The news says: "his claims made a great impact in the scientific circle"
Come on! It seems like the Otto Binder-Chatelain UFO stuff, debunked long ago:
"A certain professor, who wished to remain anonymous, was engaged in a discussion with Neil Armstrong during a NASA symposium...
Professor: What REALLY happened out there with Apollo 11?
Armstrong: It was incredible...
"
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 14-November-2005, 03:26 AM
TheBlackCat's Avatar
TheBlackCat TheBlackCat is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,431
Default

UFO stands for "Unidentified Flying Object". Could something really be considered a UFO in space, where there is no air to fly through? Flying is something done in an atmosphere.
__________________
I met this wonderful girl at Macy's. She was buying clothes and I was putting Slinkies on the escalator.
-Steven Wright



My Website: The Black Cat's Web Page
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 14-November-2005, 10:55 AM
Count Zero's Avatar
Count Zero Count Zero is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,022
Default

If you ask any of the astronauts, they will tell you that they "flew in space." I accept their authority on that particular point of grammar.
__________________
"Transport of the mails, transport of the human voice, transport of flickering pictures - in this century, as in others, our highest accomplishments still have the single aim of bringing men together." St. Exupery
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 14-November-2005, 11:07 AM
Damburger Damburger is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leicester
Posts: 1,245
Default

Funny thing about your eyeball, is that you can actually see cosmic radiation, after a fashion.

Not sure of the exact mechanism, but from what I recall your vitrious humour acts as a sort of cloud chamber and you see a bright point of light for each interaction.

This has been offered as an explaination for strange phenomena witnessed by the Apollo astronauts. Personally I'm inclined to consider that stress may have been a factor - nobody before these men had to go through what they went through, so we've no idea what kind of psychological effects there would be.
__________________
"I worry that, especially as the Millennium edges nearer, pseudo-science and superstition will seem year by year more tempting, the siren song of unreason more sonorous and attractive." - Carl Sagan, 1995
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 14-November-2005, 12:26 PM
N C More's Avatar
N C More N C More is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Plymouth, MA
Posts: 2,287
Default

Anyone know where we could get a look at the video that shows this object? Also, if there is indeed video of the UFO, then that tends to support something other than psychological problems. Frankly, I'm not convinced that Mr. Aldrin actually even made these claims...any corroboration of this anywhere else?
__________________
An open mind is like an open window...without a good screen you'll get all sorts of weird bugs!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 14-November-2005, 12:50 PM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,138
Default

Yes, I'm not taking anything for granted at this point. Assuming he did say something, I'd like to know exactly what he said. There are often "things" visible around a spacecraft - bits of junk and waste, for example. I could easily imagine an interview like this:

Interviewer: Sir, this bit in the video. What is it?

Aldrin: I'm not sure.

Interviewer: So you can't identify it?

Aldrin: No.

... turn into "Aldrin says he saw a UFO!"
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 14-November-2005, 01:37 PM
Alberto Alberto is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N C More
Anyone know where we could get a look at the video that shows this object? (...) Frankly, I'm not convinced that Mr. Aldrin actually even made these claims...any corroboration of this anywhere else?
I found nothing, that is what makes me think it's a fabrication, but it is creating a snowball in many ufo sites. So a clarification will be appreciated.
The fact is that more or less 500.000 Spaniards saw yesterday on primetime TV something similar to the 2001 Fox TV "Conspiracy Theory" (I have to start a thread about it, I'm writing a rebuttal and need help...), and they mentioned all this about Aldrin (without showing any photo or video).

This is the only thing I found, apart from the cable news agency I posted earlier:

http://www.cohenufo.org/unsolved.html#aldrinapollo11

Aldrin's 2005 "First on the Moon" Documentary
Testimony regarding Apollo 11 UFO
(Hype for the documentary, or legit?)

9/26/05: NASA expert Jim Oberg may be interested in this as well. Verified as fact by "Buzz" Aldrin, an unsolved UFO seen by astronauts Neil Armstrong and "Buzz" Aldrin on their Apollo 11 flight to the moon.

Aldrin stated their booster rocket was 6000 miles away from them. They felt very certain that what they saw following their space craft was much closer than that. It was not part of the urine dump and they didn't really believe it was from their own spacecraft. Aldrin stated they did not talk about it directly over the air because of fear of ridicule* and because they thought it possible someone might call them back and stop the mission. Video or photos of a similar UFO taken on a succeeding mission were shown on the documentary several times. It was stated the UFO has not been solved to this day.

This information was acquired from the science channel. It was reported in the original debriefing. Their broadcast program "First on the Moon" contains the following liner note:

"With the help of the 'lost moon tape' and previously unreleased documents, scientists reveal how close Edward "Buzz" Aldrin and Neil Armstrong came to death during their Apollo 11 flight to the moon." (jc: The "death" part having nothing to do with UFOs)

The film contains short video clips from mission control, videos from the space craft itself and the trip in general, narrations by a number of people involved including Gene Kranz, Andrew Chaiken, Harold Loden, Dr. David Baker, quite a few by "Buzz" Aldrin himself, and film of President Nixon dealing with the dangers of the flight to the moon.

N.B. This is one more case not fitting Devereaux's and Persinger's theories.

* jc: once again refuting those skeptics who refuse to admit to the existence of a "ridicule factor."

More on this case can be presently found on UFO Updates in a note by Dave Stone to the mail list. Dave's letter contains more information than I included in my first post and a bit more accurate (including some direct quotes and dialog) and also mentions that the picture(s) shown was taken on a subsequent flight.

Excellent researcher Brad Sparks is presently disagreeing with me on this because he never found anything in a huge number of documents he looked through many years ago, so I will be extremely careful before I say this is 100% legit.

NB: NASA usually knows most pieces of hardware, etc. up there. The astronauts did not feel this was just some particles floating off the rocket. If the object film shown _was_ taken on a subsequent flight and the object is truly similar to what the astronauts say they saw, we need to find out how similar and on what flight the film was taken. This should definitely be clarified by the producer(s) of the documentary and requires further questioning. Updates will appear here as they become available.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 14-November-2005, 01:40 PM
Alberto Alberto is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 16
Default

Also this: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/.../m28-027.shtml

(I found nothing on the Science Channel website...)
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 14-November-2005, 03:15 PM
Kiwi Kiwi is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 559
Default

Alberto: Here's a brief debunking of the Fox programme. Scroll down to posts 10 and 11. Use that if it helps:
Fox Special rescreening in NZ -- 24 June 2003
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 14-November-2005, 04:07 PM
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Posts: 5,294
Send a message via MSN to Sticks
Default

Assuming he did say it, how about this as an explanation?
__________________
Moderations in purple

Fame, glory, adventure, a cyber warrior craves not these things.

To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post: http://www.bautforum.com/signaturepics/sigpic14611_1.gif
─────────────────────────────────────────────
Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄ Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 14-November-2005, 05:04 PM
Kiwi Kiwi is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks
Assuming he did say it, how about this as an explanation?
That link dropped me into the middle of the Apollo 11 report, so no explanation there. Are you referring to Luna 15? If so, best I can recall, they didn't see any of that from Apollo 11.

More about Luna 15 here:
http://apollohoax.proboards21.com/in...ead=1128653606
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 14-November-2005, 05:30 PM
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Posts: 5,294
Send a message via MSN to Sticks
Default

Yes Luna 15 was what I was thinking of
__________________
Moderations in purple

Fame, glory, adventure, a cyber warrior craves not these things.

To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post: http://www.bautforum.com/signaturepics/sigpic14611_1.gif
─────────────────────────────────────────────
Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄ Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 20-November-2005, 09:48 PM
genebujold's Avatar
genebujold genebujold is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,271
Default

Tongue in cheek, folks:

Must have been the Chinese. Everyone knows that had spacecraft back then and had actually established a sizeable Lunar base. It's now abandoned (they've gone on to Mars).

What I can't figure out is why now, 43 years after their first Lunar landing, the Chinese are recommitting to a space program, and claiming they never landed there in the first place, especially since they say it'll be another decade before they can reattempt?

What are they hiding??? (pulls out hair with CT fury...)
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 21-November-2005, 03:33 AM
wayneee's Avatar
wayneee wayneee is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 264
Default

In the Movie 'The Right Stuff' John Glenn reported something strange swirling around his Mercury craft. The movie made refrence of sparks coming from Aboriginal Australian Medicine man. Did that actualy happen?
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 21-November-2005, 03:53 AM
aurora's Avatar
aurora aurora is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,064
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wayneee
In the Movie 'The Right Stuff' John Glenn reported something strange swirling around his Mercury craft. The movie made refrence of sparks coming from Aboriginal Australian Medicine man. Did that actualy happen?
Ice broke off the side of the ship and went past his viewing window.
__________________
"I'm as accurate as any psychic. And I'm a cartoon!" -- Squidward

"Arrrgh, the laws of physics be a harsh mistress!" -- Bender
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 22-November-2005, 11:48 AM
ZappBrannigan's Avatar
ZappBrannigan ZappBrannigan is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 234
Default

I think I caught this show a couple of weeks ago, while channel surfing. Here's a link to the Science Channel website:

http://science.discovery.com/tvlisti...=0&channel=SCI

The show seemed fairly accurate, based on what I've learned here (I'm looking at you, JayUtah, and thanks!) But it had a sort of breathless "seconds from disaster!" kind of angle to it. Almost every paragraph of narration ended with an ominous synthesizer sting.

There was a brief section where Buzz talked about some object they saw that seemed to be... he said either 16 or 64 miles away... I forget which. But closer than the booster was, according to mission control. This was followed by more ominous stings and Buzz with a wry smile. Never underestimate the power of editing.

There were also interview bits with Gene Krantz and the guy (I forgot his name) who spoke up and said they were still go with the 1202 alarm.

For people who read this board on a regular basis, I'd say the show was beginner to advanced beginner level.
__________________
See? Because of me, now there's a warning. -Homer Simpson
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 22-November-2005, 12:22 PM
Alberto Alberto is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 16
Default

Yes, I found it some days ago. They are reairing it in december, that was why I didn't find anything when I first searched. It is the story of the S-IVB or chunks from the booster... I wrote to Jim Oberg, and he said to me that the conjectures some people made about how far the objects would be were based in very uncertain estimates about the velocity of separation from the booster.
Here is the astronauts' quote about it from Robert Godwin's 'Apollo 11 The NASA Mission Reports':
http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/.../m13-008.shtml

And some pics from the program I found today:
http://usuarios.lycos.es/ttd/aldrin1.JPG
http://usuarios.lycos.es/ttd/aldrin2.JPG
http://usuarios.lycos.es/ttd/aldrin3.JPG
__________________
"If you want to save your child from polio, you can pray or you can inoculate." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 22-November-2005, 03:22 PM
AstroSmurf's Avatar
AstroSmurf AstroSmurf is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,038
Send a message via ICQ to AstroSmurf
Default

Glenn's "fireflies" were in fact tiny ice crystals created by the evaporators on the spacecraft, which were used as part of the cooling system for the flight avionics. The mystery was solved by Scott Carpenter, who accidentally bumped the inside of the craft and dislodged a shower of them from the rear end where the evaporators were located.
__________________
"We do not require reality to conform to the expectations of the ignorant"
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 22-November-2005, 04:24 PM
Eric Vaxxine's Avatar
Eric Vaxxine Eric Vaxxine is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London, England
Posts: 8,422
Default

I thought everyone knew the Russians own the moon....which is why the Americans were so harassed trying to get there....and then never went back. The Russians have a healthy interest in Phobos too... that wierd potatoe like moon. I have never seen any flag waving from the Russians about Mars.

It was this site which alerted me to Lunakhod ... Russian rovers on the moon.
The USSR have been way ahead of America since Kennedy days.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 22-November-2005, 04:43 PM
R.A.F.'s Avatar
R.A.F. R.A.F. is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Vaxxine
I thought everyone knew the Russians own the moon....which is why the Americans were so harassed trying to get there....and then never went back.
Harassed???

Quote:
The Russians have a healthy interest in Phobos too... that wierd potatoe like moon. I have never seen any flag waving from the Russians about Mars.
HUH?? These 2 sentences' don't make a "lick" of sense.

Quote:
It was this site which alerted me to Lunakhod ... Russian rovers on the moon.
Alerted?? I'm glad this site could be so "helpful" in "alerting" you to such a closely guarded secret.

Quote:
The USSR have been way ahead of America since Kennedy days.
...and this is just flat out wrong!

Fact is, Eric, that there is nothing in your post that has anything to do with what is being discussed here. There is no need to hijack this thread. If you want to discuss the Russian space program then start a new thread about it.
__________________
"The facts gentlemen, and nothing but the facts, for careful eyes are narrowly watching." Isaac Asimov

Last edited by R.A.F.; 22-November-2005 at 05:05 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 22-November-2005, 08:18 PM
Eric Vaxxine's Avatar
Eric Vaxxine Eric Vaxxine is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London, England
Posts: 8,422
Default

My apologies. I was being light hearted about the Russians.

Sputnik did add haste to the American space race, in my humble opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 23-November-2005, 11:58 AM
PhantomWolf's Avatar
PhantomWolf PhantomWolf is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lost Deimos Moon Base
Posts: 5,663
Send a message via ICQ to PhantomWolf Send a message via AIM to PhantomWolf Send a message via MSN to PhantomWolf Send a message via Yahoo to PhantomWolf
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Vaxxine
My apologies. I was being light hearted about the Russians.

Sputnik did add haste to the American space race, in my humble opinion.
Well yes and no. The US were already planning their first satellite launch, TV-3 onboard Vangaurd 1. What it did do however was bring von Braun's ABMA team back into the game so they could be a backup to Vangaurd, and then after their threatened resigntins, that they could launch their own satellites, which of course was Explorer 1. ABMA didn't act with any greater haste than normal though, they had already set up everything so that they could launch in 4 months and they were preparing 1 month before they were formally given permission, so it wasn't really a surprise that they were able to launch 3 months after that.
__________________
Howling from the Shadows

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. --- JayUtah

You can't reason an irrational person out of an irrational belief. --- Noclevername

Apollo: The History and the Hoax
Enter the World of Athran
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 23-November-2005, 03:32 PM
captain swoop's Avatar
captain swoop captain swoop is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 8,668
Default

Over on talk.origins I think we would say R.A.F. had been got by a 'Loki troll'
__________________
All Moderation in Purple
To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post:
─────────────────────────────────────────────
Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 26-November-2005, 04:35 AM
Grand_Lunar's Avatar
Grand_Lunar Grand_Lunar is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Earth-Moon system
Posts: 2,282
Default

Meanwhile, back on the ranch...

I have Volume 2 of "Apollo 11: The NASA Mission Reports".

In it, Aldrin, Armstrong and Collins discussed seeing an object, but were unsure as to what it was.

I would not be surprised if it was indeed the S-IVB, as our common sense judgment of distance probably fails us in space. I know it fails us on the moon.
__________________
This is no fantasy. No careless product of wild imagination. - Jor-El

Godspeed, John Glenn. - Scott Carpenter

And these atomic bombs that science burst upon the world that night were strange even to the men that used them.
- H.G Wells, The World Set Free

To the conspiracy crowd, radiation is a big Boogey Man that inspires terror and death in all who encounter it. - JayUtah
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 27-November-2005, 06:17 PM
goodastronomy goodastronomy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 119
Default

When our astronauts see any UFO in outerspace it deserves honest discussion. That's what bugs me about all of these claims - they are with very little and in some cases NO evidence.

Even if there is evidence, it's in NASA's best interest to dismiss or debunk it as something mundane because it would be rather difficult to leave it unsolved.

So, DOES ANYONE HAVE A PICTURE OF THIS ALDREN UFO?
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 28-November-2005, 02:13 AM
aurora's Avatar
aurora aurora is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,064
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by goodastronomy
Even if there is evidence, it's in NASA's best interest to dismiss or debunk it as something mundane because it would be rather difficult to leave it unsolved.
Here's one from Apollo 16 that we have discussed previously.

http://www.nasa.gov/vision/space/tra...ce/no_ufo.html
__________________
"I'm as accurate as any psychic. And I'm a cartoon!" -- Squidward

"Arrrgh, the laws of physics be a harsh mistress!" -- Bender
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 28-November-2005, 06:33 AM
goodastronomy goodastronomy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 119
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aurora
Here's one from Apollo 16 that we have discussed previously.

http://www.nasa.gov/vision/space/tra...ce/no_ufo.html
Yeah I remember that one and fully accepted it. I was glad they solved it and wish all these other rumors could be COMPLETELY solved and put to rest.

There are so many rumors of "astronauts seeing craft and filiming it" and then having that film conviscated and threatened to have their retirement money denied to them if they told anyone about it. Too many rumors and not enough facts riddle the UFO sites.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 08:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today