Over the weekend I found a manual detailing every aspect of how it was done. Its amazing. I am still too speechless right now to really go into detail. How the twinkies found out is also amazing as NONE of thier supposed proof actually works. Just the chapter on how to set up for the rover floored me.
Anyway, until I can regain my composure and go into more detail I offer this poem that expresses (poorly for I am no poet) the state of affairs.

Armstrong and Aldrin never trod
'Pon the Moon, devoid of sod
Robots alone did make the way.
Is said by Sibrel, Percy and Bill K.
Losers all Did we Pay the Bill
For no one went, and no one will.
O shame on NASA for the lie
O shame on us for we did buy
Liars and thieves that sold the hoax
So let us hope this story croaks.

There is a message here for all of us.

See if you can get over that speechlessness long enough to share that "manual" with us. And don't give up your day job for a carreer in poetry! I suppose there's some significance to the date of your post, Waarthog? :wink:

See if you can get over that speechlessness long enough to share that "manual" with us.
Can't. I am too speechless.

I suppose there's some significance to the date of your post, Waarthog?
Shocked. Shocked I am that you would insinuate such things.

Actually I thought it was obvious as a coal pile in a ballroom. Just no one has yet commented on it.

well I sort of mentioned it in my "nasa admits to moon hoax" thread, but I avoided mentioning names or any details whatsoever because I didn't want to ruin your fun.

I, too, have seen the light, and will be leaving right after supper to begin work on my bunker out in the backyard, from which I will observe the destruction of the world by Planet X.

Sorry there isn't room for the rest of you guys.

In accordance with my newly reformed opinion on the moon hoax, Planet x, and the correct science in The Core, i have started my own anonymous club.

Apollo Anonymous.

So in our inaugrual meating of AA, i will do the first introduction.

My name is Dan, and i used to believe in NASA....

(standing ovation)

I have always believed that we went to the moon, and i have debated with others that we have. But now the demigods of the apollo hoax: JayUtah, the Bad Astronomer, and Colt will not fool me anymore. I have now seen the truth and cannot return. The evidence is out there, you just have to open your eyes.

After a good grilled cheese and easymac snack i have compiled a list of the proof against Apollo and NASA:

1. The nuclear reactor of the Saturn V rocket could not of withstood the massive G forces of re-enetry and would of blasted Cape Canaveral off the map in a disaster much larger than Chernobyl.

2. The Apollo astronauts could not of walked on the moon. Why? after careful zooming in and examination using photoshop of the apollo pictures i have found that the tred on the soles of the boots would not of carried enougth traction to keep them on their feet at all. They would have to have significant figure skaiting training to stay on their feet, and we all know that Buzz was never a figure skater.

3. There is no way they could of used a computer to navigate all of the way to the moon without getting the "blue screen of death" at least once.

4. We all know that the Natzi's on the moon would of spoken up and sent their ambassador to Washington to protest the Americans building a giant solar ray projector on the dark side of the moon to use as a weapon against the russians.

The evidence has spoken. Does any other believer want to repent now?

;-)

__________________
GIYUL :-)
"It takes Thousands to fight a battle for a mile, Millions to hold an election for a nation, but it only takes One to change the world." - Dan Sandler 2002

At first i too doubted the hoax. But upon the reading of the blue screen of death comment i too am now convinced we never went to the moon.

If i cant eevn open outlook how could they have navigated the moon?

I'm reading this poem, and I'm wondering if you meant it this way (note the quotation marks):

"Armstrong and Aldrin never trod
'Pon the Moon, devoid of sod
Robots alone did make the way."
Is said by Sibrel, Percy and Bill K.
"Losers all Did we Pay the Bill
For no one went, and no one will.
O shame on NASA for the lie
O shame on us for we did buy
Liars and thieves that sold the hoax"
So let us hope this story croaks.

Is that correct?

__________________
"As I lay beneath the Southern Cross, the stars tell more than I could" . . . David Meece

Easy, they went when Bill Gates was in elementary school. And long before my accursed ISP existed to foist it's alleged services on the naive consumer.
I've lost my internet connection five times in less than an hour.

__________________
If you can't dazzle 'em with dexterity, baffle 'em with BS.

Trought some dazling internet searching i have found further "proof" that NASA did fake the moon landings. I still can't believe that many of you still believe we went to the moon. Well for those of you who did not believe the first pieces of evidence, here are some more. I have to be quick, only 30 min. till the end of the day. At that time all of my reaserch skills trun to pumpkins.

5. Space is devoid of all mater. No sound in space right? Remember the add for Alien? "In space, nobody can hear you scream..." (paraphrasing). Well how could we hear the astronauts? The radio waves have no medium to propgate throught. They had to of done it on the earth.

6. There is no way they could of powered their spacecraft for several days at a time. My gameboy won't go a full day without chargin and that is 2002 technology. How can a 1960's battery last longer? A fake it must be.

7. 5 years ago i built a 1:1000 scale model of the Lunar lander out of lego's. After some scientific examinations and measuring. I used this equation to theorize the aerodynamics of the craft. Remember this is the craft that could not even flyu unaided in the earths gravty. How could it fly in the gravity of the moon which also has to deal with the gravity of the earth and the sun pulling on it? Impossible.

Here is the equation:
(X^4*3>4)/(ky*(sigma)-(Delta)+(pseudonym))* 4.5678943*Pi=43xyz. [Note: Pi=3.0 version, not the incorrect 3.14... version]

After imputting that calculation i came out with an aerodynamic figure of 4. now we all know that a aircraft must have a airodynamic number of at least 12. How could a caraft 1/3 less aerodynamic than the minimum fly? Another substancial proof against apollo.

8. On my campus at the University of Florida we have a moon tree. This tree is at least 100, possibly 150 feet tall. How can a 150 foot tall 30 year old tree fit inside a space capsule? The common sense mishaps by NASA is astuounding.

Be careful and don't be fooled by those willing to delieve. They are out there. Buy my book and 13 episode t.v. series and you will see the real story.

__________________
GIYUL :-)
"It takes Thousands to fight a battle for a mile, Millions to hold an election for a nation, but it only takes One to change the world." - Dan Sandler 2002

Nebularian,

Sure, why not? So long as the first letter of each line is unchanged.

Ha! i get it now! :-) that is good. Well hidden.

WHY, IM ASHAMED!!! are you people serious? i cant really tell if ur joking. if not, then im ashamed of all of you... especially g99... although, your posts are absolutely hilarious... oh, what the heck, i cant stay angry!!

__________________
Begone, braggage!
My bible!

If any of you guys lived in Australia you would have watched SBS televison and seen Donald Rumsfeld ADMIT that the photos were faked on the program entitled "Dark side of the Moon". The Hasselblad cameras had no protection from the extreme temperature changes on the moon and the film would never have survived, so they faked the pictures. Stanley kubrick did the photo shoot.

mavic71au, just in case you meant your post serious:

http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=2460

Harald

are you people serious? i cant really tell if ur joking.

Reacher,

In my case, the smoking gun can be found by reading the first letters of each line on the initial post poem vertically. G99 caught it but I am unsure if you did.

Reacher, if you really were serious. Just look at the date most of us posted. :-)

And welocome to AA everyone. Next week is the second meeting.

Reacher, if you really were serious. Just look at the date most of us posted.

That's not much help. The times and dates that some people see won't be the same for others -- the first post (for me) is 02 Apr 2003 03:59, the second 02 Apr 2003 04:29 and so on. At the moment it is 8:32pm, Friday 4 April.

I also thought around 1 April that it would be nice, if the posting header would also contain the local time of the poster, not only the time it was in my timezone. When some Kiwi makes an early joke, the rest gets 31 March as date of the posting and when some guy from Hawaii puts in a late one, the rest of us is already in 2 April.

Harald, hoping he got the astronomy right...

O..K. well i posted on April 1st. Aprol fools. :-)