Quote:
Originally Posted by R.A.F.
|
Noted. I got sidetracked here from the pole reversal discussion and I thank you again for the efficiency of your web linkage. Dogon was raised as an
example of the kind of topic I find interesting. I do though value the extra interpretation and clarification that is often added by the astronomers on this forum, so to some extent I'm trying to find out what 'BAUT' would cite as state-of-the-art in terms of debunking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by R.A.F.
Hmmm....first you stated that the Dogon myth "hangs together reasonably well". I then provided a link debunking that "hang togetherness", and you now say that is exactly what you were looking for?
Forgive me, but that doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
|
It all depends on how you want to interpret my sentences (witness several posts above too.) I was
exactly looking for a one page 'debunk' treatise to peruse for my own edification, at no time did I state though that I have (yet) accepted the debunker's explanation of the Dogon myth, and so accordingly it might still 'hang together'. This does not detract in any way from my satisfaction at finding a well put together debunk type explanation; especially if the author can remain detached from the adoption of any kind of entrenched standpoint. I tend to find that extreme viewpoints (on either side) can arise all too frequently in these kind of discussions.
For sure, I have no problem whatsoever if a good clarification or debunk (on here or elsewhere) invalidates any of these type of claims because I do not have a fixed or firm footing in either camp. For me it is possible to enjoy working these things through to some kind of logical outcome.
I thank all on here for their patience and the courtesy of the web links.